URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 108166--------------------------------------------------
       PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: Ray236 Date: January 31, 2026, 1:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/QpKAyko
       Hi everyone, I’d really appreciate some advice on how best to
       challenge this PCN.
       This PCN was issued for Contravention Code 52m at Rye Lane
       Junction / Hanover Park. At the time of the alleged
       contravention, I was carrying out a legitimate private hire job
       as a Bolt driver. I have full proof of the job, including pickup
       details and timestamps.
       There was no alternative way to pick up the customer other than
       going through this junction. The job itself clearly states this,
       and the pickup point could not be accessed from another route.
       I did see the restriction sign and initially attempted to turn
       around, but there was a vehicle directly behind me, also a
       private hire driver, who advised that access was allowed for
       pickups. Given the road layout and traffic situation, reversing
       or turning was not possible or safe.
       I also contacted the customer to ask if they could walk around
       to an alternative pickup point. They explained that they were
       not well enough to do so and felt it was not safe for them to
       walk around the back, particularly given the area and time.
       In short:
       I was on a live private hire booking
       I have evidence of the job
       There was no reasonable alternative route
       I attempted to avoid the restriction
       The customer could not safely relocate
       Accessing the junction was necessary to complete the booking
       I would be grateful for advice on:
       Whether this falls under necessity / mitigation
       How best to structure the initial representations
       Whether to focus on procedural grounds, discretion, or
       evidence-based mitigation
       Thanks in advance — any guidance would be massively appreciated.
       #Post#: 108175--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: fraser.mitchell Date: January 31, 2026, 2:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Please post a GSV link to the exact location. The photo on the
       PCN shows the sign, which also has a qualifier sign below it. We
       need to know what that says.
       #Post#: 108181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: ILoveCats123 Date: January 31, 2026, 4:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just thought I could help out.
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/37ge6wLikyvkcdPb8
       Good old pedestrianised (almost) rye lane
       #Post#: 108192--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: fraser.mitchell Date: January 31, 2026, 6:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=ILoveCats123 link=topic=9759.msg108181#msg108181
       date=1769897781]
       Just thought I could help out.
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/37ge6wLikyvkcdPb8
       Good old pedestrianised (almost) rye lane
       [/quote]
       Thanks, this view is 2022, (the latest) and shows buses and
       taxis are allowed. So the OP needs to submit representations on
       the basis he is a private hire vehicle and was picking up a
       customer. A PCN will be issued if the vehicle has no
       identification that it is a private hire vehicle, or the
       identification cannot be seen.
       #Post#: 108200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: MrChips Date: January 31, 2026, 6:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Do you own the vehicle (i.e. is it leased or hired)?
       The PCN seems to have been served out of time. It has to reach
       you within 28 days starting with the date if contravention, i.e.
       by 28 January, but they only sent it on 30 January.
       #Post#: 108316--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: Ray236 Date: February 1, 2026, 4:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The vehicle is hired. The PCN was initially sent to the hire
       company as the registered keeper, and they then passed liability
       to me, which is why I have only received it now.
       Also, you mentioned earlier that the restriction applies to
       “buses and taxis only”. Can someone please confirm whether this
       includes private hire vehicles, or whether it applies only to
       licensed hackney carriages (taxis)?
       #Post#: 108548--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: Ray236 Date: February 3, 2026, 9:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       hi any update on this please?
       #Post#: 108557--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: fraser.mitchell Date: February 3, 2026, 11:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry, but I don't know if private hire comes within the meaning
       of "taxi" for the sign. Thge Traffic Order should tell you, or
       you can submit reps on the basis that are a private hire car,
       picking up a passenger. They are obliged to tell you if PH
       vehicles are exempt or not when they reply.
       #Post#: 108560--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: RichardW Date: February 3, 2026, 11:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TRO says:  “bus”, “pedal cycle”, and “taxi” have the meanings
       given in the Traffic Signs Regulations and
       General Directions 2016b
       , as amended;
       And the TSRGD says:
       “taxi”
       (a)
       in England and Wales, a vehicle licensed under—
       (i)
       section 37 of the Town Police Clauses Act 1847(43); or
       (ii)
       section 6 of the Metropolitan Public Carriage Act 1869(44);
       or under any similar enactment;
       It would appear that Private Hire are licenced under Private
       Hire Vehicles (London) Act 1998 - no idea if that would be
       consider to be 'any similar enactment'.
       #Post#: 112541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN RYE LANE JUNCTION
       By: NTIAEP Date: March 9, 2026, 8:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Shouldn't the PCN (link in first post) state that "The Penalty
       Charge must be paid before the end of the period of 28 days
       beginning with the date of service of the notice".
       Same applies to the language immediately below re: discounted
       period?
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] [member=1]cp8759[/member] - your
       thoughts?
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page