URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 108077--------------------------------------------------
       UK Parking Patrol Office - "Parking In No Parking Area&quot
       ; - land at Stadium Way, Wembley
       By: blossom28 Date: January 30, 2026, 3:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Notice to keeper:
       [list]
       [li]
  HTML https://ibb.co/JWmdYmKN
       [/li]
       [li]
  HTML https://ibb.co/v4CvhWQP[/li]
       [/list]
       I have spoken to the driver of the car and have received the
       following account:
       [quote]Car was parked about 10 mins; driver has indicated that
       someone else was in the car the entire time whilst driver
       retrieved an item from a nearby shop; driver doesn’t believe
       it’s signed clearly as you enter to suggest that it's a private
       road where parking is prohibited.[/quote]
       Driver has parked in this area numerous times in the past
       without incident. Valid blue badge held at time of incident.
       Mostly interested in compliance with PoFA 2012, but any advice
       gratefully received.
       Google Maps:
  HTML https://www.google.com/maps/place/51°33'24.9"N+0°17'06.8"W/@51.5569167,-0.2858671,94m/
       Car was at:
  HTML https://ibb.co/h1CFnfhC
       (not on hatched lines)
       #Post#: 108101--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UK Parking Patrol Office - "Parking In No Parking Area&
       quot; - land at Stadium Way, Wembley
       By: jfollows Date: January 31, 2026, 3:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/9/schedule/4
       [quote]9(1)A notice which is to be relied on as a notice to
       keeper for the purposes of paragraph 6(1)(b) is given in
       accordance with this paragraph if the following requirements are
       met.
       (2)The notice must—
       (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked
       and the period of parking to which the notice relates;[/quote]
       Where is the “period of parking”?
       See also
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/pcn-from-uk-parking-patrol-office/msg105542/#msg105542
       #Post#: 108145--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UK Parking Patrol Office - "Parking In No Parking Area&
       quot; - land at Stadium Way, Wembley
       By: blossom28 Date: January 31, 2026, 9:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=jfollows link=topic=9749.msg108101#msg108101
       date=1769852543]
       Where is the “period of parking”?
       See also
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/pcn-from-uk-parking-patrol-office/msg105542/#msg105542
       [/quote]
       Cheers (and thanks for the link), you're quite right that it's
       simply an instant in time specified on the NTK, rather than a
       range.
       So, standard reply appears to be along these lines:
       [quote]
       I am the keeper of the vehicle with registration [REG] and I
       dispute your 'parking charge', received 27th January 2026. I
       deny any liability or contractual agreement and I will be making
       a complaint about your predatory conduct to your client
       landowner.
       As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with all
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge. It does not specify “the
       period of parking” as required. This omission renders the notice
       non-compliant, and as such, the operator cannot rely on PoFA to
       pursue the registered keeper.
       Partial or even substantial compliance is not sufficient. There
       will be no admission as to who was driving and no inference or
       assumptions can be drawn. UK Parking Patrol Office has relied on
       contract law allegations of breach against the driver only.
       The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency.
       [/quote]
       Presumably appealing via recorded post is the method likely to
       incur UKPPO the most handling fees. Given we're outside the 14
       day period now, there's no remedy for UKPPO - right? They're out
       of time to deliver a fixed NTK.
       I will do some digging into who the landowner is; I think a lot
       of what's near Wembley Stadium is Quintain's.
       I'll reply here once the initial appeal has been rejected,
       assume the next step then may as well be a POPLA appeal.
       #Post#: 108153--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UK Parking Patrol Office - "Parking In No Parking Area&
       quot; - land at Stadium Way, Wembley
       By: jfollows Date: January 31, 2026, 10:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Recorded post is not usually advised. The recipient can choose
       not to accept it. Email or first class post with certificate of
       posting are better. Don’t waste your money.
       #Post#: 111738--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UK Parking Patrol Office - "Parking In No Parking Area&
       quot; - land at Stadium Way, Wembley
       By: blossom28 Date: March 2, 2026, 7:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Response entirely fails to engage with the substance of the
       appeal. Actually, it cuts off mid-sentence at the end too ;D
  HTML https://ibb.co/ccxVQvT8
       I'm keen to do an IAS appeal, is there anything else worth
       stating in the appeal or is the initial appeal text enough?
       #Post#: 113066--------------------------------------------------
       Re: UK Parking Patrol Office - "Parking In No Parking Area&
       quot; - land at Stadium Way, Wembley
       By: blossom28 Date: March 12, 2026, 3:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is what I've currently got as a draft for the IAS appeal.
       For the questions in the initial part of the appeal, I have
       answered as follows:
       WERE YOU: The DRIVER at the time of the parking event? (please
       tick): Not prepared to say
       The KEEPER of the vehicle at the time of the parking event?
       (please tick): Yes
       Why do you say the parking charge is not payable?
       [quote]
       The operator is attempting to rely on keeper liability under
       Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (“POFA”).
       However, the Notice to Keeper does not comply with the mandatory
       requirements of POFA and therefore keeper liability cannot
       apply.
       Schedule 4, Paragraph 9(2)(a) of POFA states that the Notice to
       Keeper must:
       “specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked
       and the period of parking to which the notice relates.”
       The notice I received does not specify any period of parking.
       Instead, it only provides a single timestamp:
       “Incident Time/Date: 11:15 16/01/2026”
       I have enclosed the notice and highlighted this part of it in
       red.
       A single moment in time does not constitute a period. The
       combination of a date and instant in time does not constitute a
       period. Parliament deliberately required the notice to specify a
       period of parking, which necessarily implies a defined duration
       with both a start and end. The operator has failed to provide
       this.
       This omission is not a triviality. As you will be aware,
       compliance with Schedule 4 is a strict statutory requirement if
       a parking operator wishes to transfer liability from the driver
       to the registered keeper. Where the statutory conditions are not
       met, keeper liability simply does not arise.
       As the Notice to Keeper fails to specify the period of parking
       as required by Paragraph 9(2)(a), it is not compliant with
       Schedule 4 of POFA. Consequently, the operator cannot rely on
       keeper liability and is out of time to issue a corrected NTK.
       The operator is therefore limited to pursuing the driver, who
       has not been identified. As the keeper, I cannot be held liable
       for this charge. For this reason alone, the appeal must be
       allowed.
       The operator has failed to consider or respond to any of these
       points which I raised in my initial appeal and appears not to
       have even finished writing the appeal rejection notice before
       printing it and sending it to me.
       [/quote]
       Not going to hold my breath on a positive response, but keen to
       engage fully. Hopefully it will cost UKPPO a bit, too; and they
       can enjoy dealing with it all via post again.
       Any feedback/amends appreciated.
       *****************************************************