URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 107262--------------------------------------------------
       Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: ReflectoR
       Date: January 24, 2026, 1:53 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi everyone.
       So I forgot to renew my permit with Islington, and I got a PCN.
       I appealed, and it got rejected, and I appealed again, and it
       got rejected again. They sent the NTO, and I sent the same
       appeal which got rejected as well.
       My appeal was that I forgot, but the reason I had forgotten was
       because when I originally went to renew the Islington permit
       portal wasn't functioning correctly, can't remember exactly what
       was wrong, so I was going to try again later. But never did.
       I know it's not the best excuse, but I'd like to take it to
       tribunal anyway. But the rejection to the formal representation
       seems to suggest I can't? I've pasted it below.
       My original submission to the NTO
       I would like to clarify the circumstances again, as my concern
       is that the mitigation I raised has not been fully considered. I
       attempted to renew my residents’ permit before the PCN was
       issued; however, the council’s online system repeatedly failed
       to process the renewal. This technical issue was outside my
       control, and I took reasonable steps to remain compliant. I urge
       the council to check its system logs, which should evidence my
       attempts to renew the permit. I have previously held a valid
       residents’ permit and had no intention of avoiding payment. I
       acted in good faith and attempted to renew on time, but was
       prevented from doing so due to system failure. In addition, I
       have ADHD, which means that despite making an initial attempt to
       resolve the issue, I am more prone to forgetting to retry
       immediately once a system error occurs. This makes it especially
       important that reasonable adjustments and fairness are applied
       where renewal was attempted but blocked by circumstances beyond
       my control. Given these facts, I believe it would be
       unreasonable and disproportionate to enforce a penalty for a
       situation caused by the council’s own system preventing renewal.
       I respectfully ask that this matter be reconsidered in light of
       fairness.
  HTML https://u.cubeupload.com/rtx/NTOrejection1.jpg
       page 2
  HTML https://u.cubeupload.com/rtx/NTOrejection2.jpg
       #Post#: 107264--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: MrChips
       Date: January 24, 2026, 2:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Who was the NTO addressed to?
       #Post#: 107306--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: ReflectoR
       Date: January 25, 2026, 9:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The NTO was addressed to my wife's name.
       I made the "appeal"/representation under my name on their online
       form.
       #Post#: 107307--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: MrChips
       Date: January 25, 2026, 10:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If the NTO is addressed to your wife, she's legally responsible
       and the council can't consider representations from another
       party (without their express authorisation).
       #Post#: 107331--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: ReflectoR
       Date: January 25, 2026, 4:47 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What should my next steps be? Wait for another letter after the
       8th?
       Or write authorisation from my wife now?
       Either way I wanted to take it to tribunal since it's 110 now
       anyway.
       #Post#: 107334--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 25, 2026, 5:00 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Your wife can take the matter to London Tribunals and nominate
       you as her representative. This needs her to write and sign a
       letter of authority. Of course a typed letter only needs her
       signature.
       #Post#: 107335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: ReflectoR
       Date: January 25, 2026, 5:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you.
       So would we do this after receiving the next letter, or do we
       have to do it now?
       Since the NTO was already served, and I was the one that
       responded?
       #Post#: 107348--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 25, 2026, 7:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I order to register an appeal at the adjudicators, one must
       first have had reps against a Notice to Owner rejected. The
       rejection must advise you of your right to adjudication and
       explain the process.
       #Post#: 107916--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: ReflectoR
       Date: January 29, 2026, 11:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So technically my reps was rejected. But Islington are saying
       that I can't take it to tribunal because I'm not the owner.
       Does this mean I wait for another NTO, and then get my wife to
       appeal that?
       Or do I write back now, and say my wife wants to take it to
       tribunal?
       #Post#: 107925--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Does this mean I cannot take it to tribunal?
   DIR By: RichardW
       Date: January 29, 2026, 12:46 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think there will be another NTO, next will be charge
       certificate which you can't appeal against. It still appears you
       can make an appeal on their website, so try sending the reps
       again, in your wife's name this time...
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page