URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Non-motoring legal advice
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 105412--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: DWMB2 Date: January 11, 2026, 10:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Worth noting that Morrisons petrol stations were bought by MFG a
       couple of years ago, so although still branded up as Morrisons,
       Morrisons 'proper' might not be the creditor for the debt for
       any unpaid fuel.
       #Post#: 105414--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: lateman Date: January 11, 2026, 10:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       well morrisons' main store were very sympathetic and as helpful
       as they could be, but because they are separate from the fuel
       stations, i had to go speak to them.  there, the lone attendant
       let me use his phone to speak to the manager, who was not very
       helpful at all.  he first told me I'd have to pay the fine.  he
       also told me the police were involved (i doubted this, as i have
       not been contacted by the police, and the letter from Pay My
       Fuel was issued the day after the offence).  so i asked him for
       a crime number, to which he replied that i would have to see him
       in work tomorrow and he would give me the details.  (I'm unable
       to meet him due to work but he said my wife could call on my
       behalf), which she is going to do).
       morrisons' main store customer services also gave me the main
       customer services phone number, and also the head office phone
       number, and from the fuel station i got a business card for MFG,
       who run the stations apparently, so I'll be calling some of
       those tomorrow too.
       in the meantime, if anyone has any advice, what info should i be
       trying to obtain from any of these people, I'd be most grateful.
       #Post#: 105422--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: NewJudge Date: January 11, 2026, 11:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I haven’t heard of “Pay My Fuel” (PMF). However there have been
       a number of threads on another forum with similar topics
       involving a firm of solicitors called QDR. They operate on a
       similar model.
       Their letters do not mention an intended prosecution nor do they
       mention a penalty charge.
       There were different opinions in responses to those threads. The
       principal issue that I could see was that QDR make their demand
       solely on the basis that the person they demand payment from is
       the Registered Keeper. It seems “Pay My Fuel” do the same.
       That’s not surprising as they have no idea who was actually
       responsible for the alleged debt.
       QDR have no interest in pursuing anybody other than the RK. In
       one thread the RK was not in the car at the time and he offered
       to provide the driver’s details to QDR. They didn’t want to
       know. In another the debt arose because of a fault with he “Pay
       at Pump” system. The driver had inserted a card and had £100
       holding sum debited. The pump was supposed to see him charged
       with the cost of the fuel and his £100 returned. It failed to
       charge for the fuel but his deposit was returned in full and he
       didn’t notice this until after QDR had become involved. Again,
       QDR were not interested. I would imagine PMF operate similarly.
       My view is that these charges can only be levied on a
       contractual basis and to do that PMF would have to show who was
       party to the contract. I don’t see how they can do that in most
       cases. Only after they have done that would the terms of he
       contract become relevant.
       [quote]"...he first told me I'd have to pay the fine.[/quote]
       He seems as legally ignorant as PMF seem to be. In general, only
       courts can impose fines.
       I take it Morrisons now know that you were the driver at the
       time?
       #Post#: 105430--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: lateman Date: January 11, 2026, 12:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       PMF did give me the option to name the driver,  I've attached a
       photo of the form they sent with the letter.
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/xdNhzKPs/IMG_20260110_WA0026(1)(1).jpg
       but yes, morrisons (both the main store and the fuel station)
       know it was me from the conversations i had with them (a bit
       silly and short sighted of me perhaps).
       and apologies NewJudge, but i don't quite understand your last
       sentence.    do i need to speak to PMF to get to ascertain who
       was/is party to any contract?
       and when my wife visits tomorrow, if she gets a crime number, is
       it worth contacting the police?
       #Post#: 105433--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: andy_foster Date: January 11, 2026, 12:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If it were me, I would make a reasonable attempt to pay MFG for
       the fuel. If they wanted me to jump through hoops beyond what is
       reasonably necessary to conduct the transaction, I would take
       the view that they could FRO.
       Whilst some might prefer to play silly b*ggers with "prove it
       was me", the proper thing to do (if you have morals) is to at
       least make a reasonable attempt to pay what you owe. And
       document it as best you can. If they refuse to allow you to pay,
       that's their problem in my book. Also, as they happily set their
       [s]fraudulent crooks[/s] 'dubious' recovery agents on you, I
       would have very little sympathy for them.
       If they were to take you to court and found a judge sufficiently
       'motivated' to look beyond the fraudulent attempts to extort a
       penalty, the identity of the driver would be a minor
       consideration.
       #Post#: 105435--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: Southpaw82 Date: January 11, 2026, 12:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=The Slithy Tove
       link=topic=9447.msg105410#msg105410 date=1768147756]
       And you can't transfer a debt without both parties (Morrisons
       and Pay My Fuel) contacting the alleged debtor stating this
       [/quote]
       Are you sure?
       #Post#: 105441--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: lateman Date: January 11, 2026, 12:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       well i have already stated to morrisons store and the fuel
       station that I'm happy to pay the debt, but not very happy to
       pay the extortionate penalty.
       but i also don't want the hassle of it going to court,
       especially if I'm not certain that i wouldn't be made to pay the
       penalty (especially if it goes up to £150 for not paying
       promptly), and any other court costs
       #Post#: 105443--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: DWMB2 Date: January 11, 2026, 1:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote] but i also don't want the hassle of it going to court
       [/quote]
       A combination of this, and some people's lack of knowledge of
       the legal position in these cases, are probably key to the
       success of PayMyFuel's business model.
       #Post#: 105445--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: NewJudge Date: January 11, 2026, 1:51 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote]…well i have already stated to morrisons store and the
       fuel station that I'm happy to pay the debt, but not very happy
       to pay the extortionate penalty.[/quote]
       Yes, that’s probably the view most people take. I’m not
       suggesting that people who have made a mistake should simply not
       be liable to make good the debt. But all PMF has done is to
       obtain your details from the DVLA and send you a template
       letter. Fifty quid is an excessive   charge for that task and
       three times that for a “late” payment is outrageous.
       [quote]A combination of this, and some people's lack of
       knowledge of the legal position in these cases, are probably key
       to the success of PayMyFuel's business model.
       [/quote]
       And there’s the rub. QDR sate in their letter
       “You are the current registered keeper of this vehicle and we
       require you to make full payment of this debt within 7 days.”
       They know that some drivers are aware that liability for some
       decriminalised offences can be transferred to the RK and they
       rely on that to fool those they deal with that the same applies.
       PMF heads their letters “notice of intended prosecution” and
       threaten court action.
       #Post#: 105461--------------------------------------------------
       Re: not paying for fuel
       By: Dave Green Date: January 11, 2026, 9:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Southpaw82 link=topic=9447.msg105435#msg105435
       date=1768156734]
       [quote author=The Slithy Tove
       link=topic=9447.msg105410#msg105410 date=1768147756]
       And you can't transfer a debt without both parties (Morrisons
       and Pay My Fuel) contacting the alleged debtor stating this
       [/quote]
       Are you sure?
       [/quote]
       The Slithy Toad is partly correct.
       The debtor must be contacted to inform them that the person or
       company that the money is owed to has, or is going to be
       changing although there is nothing in the relevant legislation
       that states that both the original creditor and the creditor
       that the debt is being transferred to must separately inform the
       debtor.
       This is covered by fairly old legislation (section 136 of The
       Law of Property Act 1925).
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Geo5/15-16/20/section/136
       The requirement for the notification is to stop both the
       original and the new creditor continuing to attempt to recover
       the debt.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page