URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 122986--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Euro Car parks PCN Hire car
   DIR By: fatwheels
       Date: June 25, 2026, 11:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have been sent a final demand in my name and a letter of claim
       from DCBLegal (and a couple of pay us now letters from DCBL
       between those two that I ignored) and now the actual claim from
       the court. All uploaded to the link a couple of posts above.
       And added again here
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/3G4r6C1
       No notice to keeper, no notice to hirer, absolutely nothing. I
       did get a notification from the car hire company that they had
       received a notice to keeper but that was by email and they
       charged me 30£ as an admin fee for passing on my driving licence
       details.
       I will write a defence this evening and upload it for review.
       Thanks!
       #Post#: 123006--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Euro Car parks PCN Hire car
   DIR By: fatwheels
       Date: June 25, 2026, 3:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       How is this:-
       The defendant refutes this claim for the following reasons.
       The claimant is relying on POFA schedule 4 to establish
       liability. As the vehicle the claimant believes was parked was
       hired from Enterprise, to establish liability as per schedule 4
       the claimant needs to provide the defendant with
       1: A Notice to Hirer
       2: A copy of the original Notice to Keeper as sent to Enterprise
       3: A copy of the original hire agreement between the defendant
       and Enterprise
       4: A statement of liability signed and dated from Enterprise
       confirming that the vehicle was hired by the defendant and that
       the defendant is liable for any incurred charges
       The claimant has failed to provide ANY of the required
       documentation to the defendant or the court. This is despite
       being asked to provide this documentation on the 26th of the 1st
       2026 and confirming on the 27th of the 1st 2026 that they had
       received the request for the relevant documentation. The
       claimant has at no point in this process engaged with the
       defendant regarding the missing documentation. Presumably
       because the claimant was aware that they did not have the
       required documentation and did not want to admit that.
       The claimant is instead relying on a "Final Demand" sent to the
       defendant on the 28th of the 12th 2025 which does not in any way
       conform to the requirements of POFA schedule 4.
       The defendant asks the court to dismiss this claim as the
       claimant has failed to establish any liability on the part of
       the defendant.
       The defendant would also ask the court to take into
       consideration that if the claimant had followed the correct POFA
       procedures, the defendant would have been given a chance to
       appeal the parking charge. This appeal would almost certainly
       have been successful as the defendant did not leave the car park
       at the time in question. The defendant drove into the car park,
       parked in the first available disabled parking bay, lifted their
       wheelchair out of the car, transferred into it from the car
       seat, pushed across 3 or 4 parking bays to the payment
       information sign mounted on a supporting pillar, was unable to
       access the listed webpage for paying the parking fee, was unable
       to download and install the listed app available for paying the
       parking fee and had absolutely no wheelchair access to any other
       payment option at the site. The defendant then got back into the
       car and exited the car park. All of which happened in direct
       view of a security camera. A total of perhaps 15 minutes
       altogether.
       This information would have resulted in a successful appeal and
       the courts time would never have been wasted by this matter.
       Is there any way I can add the relevant letters ie the final
       demand and my response to it, to the defense when I do it
       online?
       Thanks.
       #Post#: 123009--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Euro Car parks PCN Hire car
   DIR By: RichardW
       Date: June 25, 2026, 4:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can't run the no keeper liability argument and then roll
       directly on to identifying yourself as the driver as that
       completely undermines the no liability argument!
       #Post#: 123011--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Euro Car parks PCN Hire car
   DIR By: fatwheels
       Date: June 25, 2026, 4:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So should I just stop at this line?
       "The defendant asks the court to dismiss this claim as the
       claimant has failed to establish any liability on the part of
       the defendant."
       Is the first part ok? I am out of my depth here.
       #Post#: 123023--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Euro Car parks PCN Hire car
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: June 26, 2026, 1:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just stop saying things like “the defendant drove into the car
       park” and instead use “the driver drove into the car park” or
       similar. Think about it.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page