DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 113228--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: tincombe Date: March 14, 2026, 6:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Sorry to go back on this, but have you actually received a PCN
in your name from Lambeth?
#Post#: 113236--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: msym Date: March 14, 2026, 7:19 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=tincombe link=topic=9266.msg113228#msg113228
date=1773488652]
Sorry to go back on this, but have you actually received a PCN
in your name from Lambeth?
[/quote]
Hello, valid point.
The first one was from the lease company that was accompanied
with a 3rd party authorisation letter. I had assumed that this
transferred the responsibility to me. Is that not the case. If
this is indeed the issue then do I just make the same
representations?
Thank you,
Marios
#Post#: 113242--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: tincombe Date: March 14, 2026, 9:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
IMO, you may not make reps in your own name, unless you have a
PCN in your own name.
You have no liability to the council if a PCN has not been
issued to you. The most you are doing is the leg work for the
RK.
The RK cannot 'transfer' liability under the guise of them
having a hire agreement with you because there is no such
agreement which BY LAW has to be of a prescribed form AND have a
term no longer than 6 months.
#Post#: 113271--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: msym Date: March 14, 2026, 2:02 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=tincombe link=topic=9266.msg113242#msg113242
date=1773496851]
IMO, you may not make reps in your own name, unless you have a
PCN in your own name.
You have no liability to the council if a PCN has not been
issued to you. The most you are doing is the leg work for the
RK.
The RK cannot 'transfer' liability under the guise of them
having a hire agreement with you because there is no such
agreement which BY LAW has to be of a prescribed form AND have a
term no longer than 6 months.
[/quote]
thank you for the response. WHat does this mean in practive? the
second letter of this PCN is now under my name. Does this mean
the first represenation was void and as such i need to go
thorugh the process again?
Regards,
Marios
#Post#: 113275--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: tincombe Date: March 14, 2026, 3:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
the second letter of this PCN is now under my name
Sorry, but what 'letter'? Pl post.
#Post#: 113280--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: msym Date: March 14, 2026, 3:44 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=tincombe link=topic=9266.msg113275#msg113275
date=1773519783]
the second letter of this PCN is now under my name
Sorry, but what 'letter'? Pl post.
[/quote]
Hello, please see below.
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/NuhoA98#9kN7V8H
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/NuhoA98#D3ze7hI
This is the one I received under my name.
There is another one that the lease company had received which
is almost identical with the exception of the addressee and the
date of penalty charge notice.
Thank you for the support
#Post#: 113562--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: msym Date: March 17, 2026, 5:55 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
hello all
Any thoughts on the matter? I need to pause the clock as the
fees will go further up..
Many thanks
#Post#: 114147--------------------------------------------------
Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
ehicles entering a p
By: msym Date: March 23, 2026, 2:23 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=msym link=topic=9266.msg113280#msg113280
date=1773521065]
[quote author=tincombe link=topic=9266.msg113275#msg113275
date=1773519783]
the second letter of this PCN is now under my name
Sorry, but what 'letter'? Pl post.
[/quote]
Hello, please see below.
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/NuhoA98#9kN7V8H
HTML https://imgpile.com/p/NuhoA98#D3ze7hI
This is the one I received under my name.
There is another one that the lease company had received which
is almost identical with the exception of the addressee and the
date of penalty charge notice.
Thank you for the support
[/quote][quote author=Hippocrates
link=topic=9266.msg113218#msg113218 date=1773483113]
I'll take a look later as Lambeth's brains operate in mysterious
ways.
[/quote]
Hi both, Do you have any advice please? I can make the same
representations again to stop the clock for the fees going
further up. I am also consious that at another thread, a very
similar response got rejected for the same place.
thank you
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page