URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 104883--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: msym Date: January 7, 2026, 1:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=9266.msg104819#msg104819
       date=1767727431]
       Ticket ReferenceLJ35493793
       Your PCN is at discount stage. PCN process information
       Vehicle Registration NumberBC23KSE
       ColourGREY
       MakeNISSAN
       Contravention53j - Failing to comply with a restriction on
       vehicles entering a pedestrian zone (camera enforcement)
       LocationRosendale Road (H)
       First seen atFri, 5 Dec 2025 8:52
       Issued atFri, 5 Dec 2025 8:52
       Served byPost
       The amount outstanding on the Charge Notice will increase to
       £160.00 very soon. Please pay £80.00 now.
       [/quote]
       Is the challenge that the website does not contain enough
       information on when it needs to be paid by? I assumed this would
       not be an issue as it's written on the PCN. If so, is there a
       set paragraph that I could use in this circumstance?
       Thank you
       #Post#: 105022--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: msym Date: January 7, 2026, 3:34 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi Hippocrates and al,
       I would greatly appreciate some advice on the bellow
       representation response and whether you think its adequate. Its
       an amalgamation of past letters and information i could gather
       from past posts.
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member], I have tried to capture your
       point on the dates but please correct me if i misunderstood.
       thank you
       --------------
       To Whom It May Concern,
       I make representations against
       PCN number: LJ35493793
       Contravention: 53j
       VRN: BC23KSE
       Location: Rosendale Road (H)
       The first ground by way of collateral challenge: There was no
       contravention of a prescribed order.
       The signage in situ and accompanying plate a place directly
       after the turn on Rosendale Road, there is no advance signage to
       warn that this restriction is upcoming and by the time one is in
       a position to see the signs it is too late. Indeed, reading the
       exemption plate placed as it is impossible from a moving vehicle
       and to stop at the location in question would be inherently
       dangerous as would attempting to reverse back.
       For these reasons the signage fails in its requirement under
       LATOR 1996 s18 to adequately inform the motorist. No
       contravention can occur in these circumstances and the PCN
       should be cancelled
       The second ground by way of collateral challenge: Dates between
       PCN and Council’s website are misleading.
       I am making a collateral challenge on the grounds that the
       penalty charge discount amount date as published on Lambeth’s
       website does not coincide with the 14 day period on the PCN
       itself.
       The PCN states:
       “If the penalty charge is paid before the end of the period of
       14 days beginning with the date of the notice, the amount of the
       penalty charge will be reduced by 50% to £80.”
       The end of the 14 day period would thus be 30 December 2025.
       Yet on your website [extract taken today 7 January 2025] it
       states:
       “The amount outstanding on the Charge Notice will increase to
       £160.00 very soon. Please pay £80.00 now.”
       Moreover, the website gives the date of issue as 5 Dec (which is
       when the CCTV was recorded) while the PCN itself bears the date
       17 Dec. Taken together this is all clearly misleading. I refer
       you to a recent case decided at the London Tribunal [224036272
       decided 15 October 2024] on similar grounds i.e. where Lambeth’s
       website was inconsistent with the information given on the PCN.
       The adjudicator Mr Houghton said:
       “In bare summary the Appellant submits that the Council’s
       website was giving incorrect and/or confusing information
       regarding payment dates……The motorist is entitled to have clear
       and correct information from a Council as to what is required to
       be paid and when; and in my judgement these errors are serious
       enough for the Appeal to be allowed on the basis of a collateral
       challenge.”
       In light of the aforementioned collateral challenges, the PCN
       should be cancelled. It is incumbent upon an authority to have
       clear road signs and give clear and precise states re payments
       etc and these must be according to the statutory process.
       ---------------
       
       #Post#: 105028--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: Hippocrates Date: January 7, 2026, 4:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good stuff. If you don't mind, it needs slight tweaking. I'll
       gate back tomorrow. No warning signs are necessary.
       #Post#: 105038--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: msym Date: January 7, 2026, 5:19 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=9266.msg105028#msg105028
       date=1767825015]
       Good stuff. If you don't mind, it needs slight tweaking. I'll
       gate back tomorrow. No warning signs are necessary.
       [/quote]
       Many thanks
       #Post#: 105111--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: msym Date: January 8, 2026, 12:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=9266.msg105028#msg105028
       date=1767825015]
       Good stuff. If you don't mind, it needs slight tweaking. I'll
       gate back tomorrow. No warning signs are necessary.
       [/quote]
       If you can point me to the changes I can try and do them myself.
       I am worried as the discount will disappear. Its already past
       the 14days but they havent yet increased it.
       thank you
       #Post#: 105113--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: Hippocrates Date: January 8, 2026, 12:58 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I make these formal representations against PCN
       1. There was no contravention of a prescribed order because the
       signage in situ and accompanying plate a place directly after
       the turn on Rosendale Road, there is no advance signage to warn
       that this restriction is upcoming and by the time one is in a
       position to see the signs it is too late. Indeed, reading the
       exemption plate placed as it is impossible from a moving vehicle
       and to stop at the location in question would be inherently
       dangerous as would attempting to reverse back.
       For these reasons the signage fails in its requirement under
       LATOR 1996 s18 to adequately inform the motorist.
       2. A motorist must be given wholly correct information when to
       pay the reduced or full amounts sought. However, there is a
       clear disconnect between the law and what is stated on your
       website.
       In light of the above, please cancel the PCN
       #Post#: 105180--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: msym Date: January 9, 2026, 5:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=9266.msg105113#msg105113
       date=1767898695]
       I make these formal representations against PCN
       1. There was no contravention of a prescribed order because the
       signage in situ and accompanying plate a place directly after
       the turn on Rosendale Road, there is no advance signage to warn
       that this restriction is upcoming and by the time one is in a
       position to see the signs it is too late. Indeed, reading the
       exemption plate placed as it is impossible from a moving vehicle
       and to stop at the location in question would be inherently
       dangerous as would attempting to reverse back.
       For these reasons the signage fails in its requirement under
       LATOR 1996 s18 to adequately inform the motorist.
       2. A motorist must be given wholly correct information when to
       pay the reduced or full amounts sought. However, there is a
       clear disconnect between the law and what is stated on your
       website.
       In light of the above, please cancel the PCN
       [/quote]
       Thank you. I have sumbbitted the representation as you stated.
       Once i receive a response i will reply back.
       thank you for the support. (lets hope for the best).
       
       #Post#: 105262--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: Hippocrates Date: January 9, 2026, 12:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can't wait.  :o
       #Post#: 113145--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: msym Date: March 13, 2026, 10:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=9266.msg105262#msg105262
       date=1767982026]
       Can't wait.  :o
       [/quote]
       Dear Hippocrates,
       I have an odd update retgarding this case. I have not formally
       received a response on my representation but:
       - 9 Jan I sumbitted the representation
       - 18 Feb I got another letter with the same PCN
       - 24 Feb I checked the lambeth portal and the site was saying
       that representation has been received
       - 13 Mar I checked the lambeth portal again and it now says to
       pay full amount or it will increase to £240 on 29March.
       What do i do? Do i make new represenations again?
       new screens on links below.
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/NuhoA98#dhfxJ4S
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/NuhoA98#n66nGqj
       #Post#: 113218--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Lambeth, code 53j, failing to comply with a restriction on v
       ehicles entering a p
       By: Hippocrates Date: March 14, 2026, 5:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'll take a look later as Lambeth's brains operate in mysterious
       ways.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page