URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 111426--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: FH123
       Date: February 27, 2026, 3:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I'm also reading that 10 lines of text is considered 3-4 seconds
       of reading time and that conditions such as days or times
       restrictions apply increases the processing time as you would
       need to read, process and then check the time. Thus such a sign
       would fail the 'safely reading at a glance test'.
       Placing these directly on the corner of a junction where you
       will have cars turning in or coming out and demanding your
       attention is also not good practice, especially if the path or
       size of the vehicles can easily block direct line of sight to
       the sign.
       #Post#: 111430--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 27, 2026, 4:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So on this thread you go through a lot of text on the signs and
       their unreadability by a driver in a moving car, yet looking
       through, I see no photos of these signs nor any GSV link to the
       locations. How can we advise on something we can't see ?
       #Post#: 111432--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: FH123
       Date: February 27, 2026, 4:29 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here you go:
  HTML https://cdn.imgpile.com/f/H4fLsLS_xl.png
       #Post#: 111436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 27, 2026, 4:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       GSV link ? Or is GSV not sufficiently up-to-date to show the
       restriction ?
       #Post#: 111458--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: FH123
       Date: February 28, 2026, 3:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Unfortunately the signs don't appear to be there on GSV. This
       suggests it's a fairly recent restriction.
       Let's work with what we do have.
       The text on the sign says:
       PEDESTRIAN
       and CYCLE
       ZONE
       [red circle sign with car and motorbike inside it]
       Mon-Fri
       8.15-9.15am
       2.30-3.45pm
       [Additional lower sign]
       Except
       [Something something]
       and permit
       holders
       So 10 lines of text, including 2 sets of times, one set of day
       related restrictions.
       I'm not contesting the sign makes perfect sense if you can
       actually read it and take it in. There was apparently a warning
       sign earlier on the road. Blue background and 10 lines of white
       text. So I must have driven past 4 of these signs (2 sets) and
       missed them all. I have no other 'missed sign' related
       contraventions to my name in over 20 years of driving. I can
       read. It's not difficult to get me to comply with a road sign.
       You can also see the van encroaching out of the junction and my
       car going around it. I don't know what that van was doing like
       that, but they were turning into my road. It's the only time in
       my life I have ever driven on this road. Gloomy, rainy morning.
       Great test scenario for whether these signs are usable and
       effective really in my opinion.
       #Post#: 111466--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 28, 2026, 4:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Really we need to see the approach to the sign and how the sign
       appears and the actual sign itself.
       You have valid points on amount of text to read and absorb, but
       I expect this is a 20mph zone, so that lessens the point as
       you're going slowly enough to read the sign. The sign is the
       usual "Flying Motorbike" sign that has been around for donkey's
       years, but now in widespread use in London. You also mention an
       advance sign, so can we see that.
       Sorry about all this, but unless we can see what you saw, its
       very difficult to advise on an appeal text. I get the impression
       you are new to London, because these timed closed streets have
       been around now for several years.
       #Post#: 111469--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: FH123
       Date: February 28, 2026, 4:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       We'll...I did not see any of the signs ;D
       But yes, we want to assess them fully for what they are.
       Best I can do is send image of the map provided by Ealing
       council in their rejection notice. This is the only evidence I
       have that the warning sign exists. Note the final entry sign is
       a bit different on their map to the one it situ (it's 9 lines
       whereas the actual one has 10 lines and 2 additional words).
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://cdn.imgpile.com/f/oF5TTb3_xl.JPG[/img]
       #Post#: 111472--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: FH123
       Date: February 28, 2026, 4:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Obviously when we see both signs shown like this whilst calmly
       sipping a cup of tea in front of our computer screen, it all
       seems very clear and above board.
       #Post#: 111496--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: February 28, 2026, 6:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: FH123 link ---
       >
       > Obviously when we see both signs shown like this whilst calmly
       sipping a cup of tea in front of our computer screen, it all
       seems very clear and above board.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Well, no, even though it may seem so. Signage giving
       instructions and warnings to motorists must first of all be
       "traffic signs" as defined in The Traffic Signs Regulations and
       General Directions 2016. That is a basic requirement. Then what
       is erected must pass the "adequacy" test. This is a requirement
       in Regulation 18 of The Local Authorities’ Traffic Orders
       (Procedure) (England and Wales) Regulations 1996.
       So two tests must be passed. In your case the advance warning
       sign is not a traffic sign. If it had been a geographical
       representation of the junction ahead with the left turn marked
       as No Entry it would be part of the signage indicating the
       restriction. For the signs themselves, they may comply with the
       TSRGD 2016, but if there is only one of them, it may fail the
       'adequacy' test.  However, 'adequate' is subjective. Your
       'inadequate' is the councils 'adequate' so the only place to
       test this is at London Tribunals where the adjudicator will
       decide one way or the other.
       Here are the two sets of regulations:-
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2016/362/schedule/9/made
       and
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/2489/contents
       So if you are prepared to stand your ground and take them to
       London Tribunals based on the above, you could win, but of
       course it is not guaranteed, and you must risk the full PCN
       penalty. If you win you pay nothing, if you lose, you pay the
       PCN penalty, but there are no other costs.
       #Post#: 111519--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Ealing PCN - 53J restriction on vehicles entering a
       pedestrian zone - Allenby Rd Southall & Oldfield Ln South
       Greenf
   DIR By: FH123
       Date: February 28, 2026, 8:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes I understand. Is there a reasonable chance of winning at a
       tribunal? Are they impartial? Do they listen to sound, logical
       arguments?
       BTW I work in human factors information design. As an expert in
       that field I can say a multi line text instruction at a junction
       will never, ever pass an objective adequacy test. i.e. out of
       100 human motorists with clean licenses, how many would notice,
       read, comprehend and make the correct decision whilst driving
       down that road for the first time under the same conditions. No
       doubt some would, but I would not expect this to be the norm.
       That is why I quoted the human factors study above. It says
       signs should be visual and 2-3 lines maximum of text at 30 mph.
       Otherwise not only are they unreadable, but become a hazard for
       any motorist trying to comply.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page