DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 122982--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: June 25, 2026, 10:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The NtK is in the original post.
It wasn’t received last week.
So now you think you might have received a Letter of Claim from
some solicitor.
If that’s what you’re missing, make sure the SAR addresses this.
The Letter of Claim is likely to be from DCB Legal, but that’s
only a guess.
#Post#: 123083--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: June 26, 2026, 1:07 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: jfollows link ---
>
> The NtK is in the original post.
> It wasn’t received last week.
> So now you think you might have received a Letter of Claim
from some solicitor.
> If that’s what you’re missing, make sure the SAR addresses
this.
> The Letter of Claim is likely to be from DCB Legal, but that’s
only a guess.
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes, I have sent a SAR addressing the possibility that the
letter may have been sent by their ssolicitors
#Post#: 125617--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: July 24, 2026, 11:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: jfollows link ---
>
> The NtK is in the original post.
> It wasn’t received last week.
> So now you think you might have received a Letter of Claim
from some solicitor.
> If that’s what you’re missing, make sure the SAR addresses
this.
> The Letter of Claim is likely to be from DCB Legal, but that’s
only a guess.
>
--- End Quote ---
June 25: Sent SAR
June 29: Acknowledgment received
July 8: DPO requested proof of ID
July 12: Proof of ID sent
July 22: Received HM Courts Claim form with issue date as 15
July.
Claimant is UK Parking Control
Address of Sending Documents given as:
Moorside Legal Services Ltd
-----------------------------
I have not yet received back my SAR and will return the
Aknowledgment of Service with 'I intend to defend all of this
claim' selected.
One more thing that I think will be very useful in proving my
statement is that I was going through some old pictures on my
wifes phone and found I had whatsapp'd her several pictures of
my daughter trying on a coat while at the store on the retail
park. I followed up with a link to another coat in store for my
wife to review for my son. We had back and forth whats app
correspondence about the coats and everything is time-stamped on
whatsapp.
#Post#: 125928--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: July 27, 2026, 1:59 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Really don't want to end up with a CCJ!
#Post#: 125933--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: July 27, 2026, 2:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
If you received a N1SDT claim form dated 15 July then you can
file AoS by 3 August followed by defence by 17 August.
#Post#: 126013--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: July 28, 2026, 7:29 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you. Yes I returned the AOS a few days ago.
I have now since received the a file from them relating to my
FOI request. It essentially contains:
1. Their original Notice to keeper
2. Copy of our original appeal
3. A copy of the letter they sent requesting the full name and
address of the driver
4. A copy of our reply to their request
5. A copy of their letter rejecting our appeal (this is the one
I found late because it had been emailed to me and was in my
junk folder)
6. 3 images taken of the front of my van timed a few seconds
apart (seemed to have been taken by a human because of the
straight on angle)
7. A screen shot of a system page showing the vehicle details
8. A screen shot of a system showing the vehicle keeper details
(name, address of the keeper)
9. A screen shot of a system showing the details and status of
the PCN (Rejected status, Received date, Name of Keeper, That it
is with the deb collector, location of contravention, rejection
reasons - left site, POPLA ref )
There are no images of a driver at all and by extension, none of
the driver 'leaving site', no notes of the incident by the
observer of what was observed or details of the driver, and no
letters that may have been sent by any solicitors or deb
collectors acting since on their behalf. So for instance, they
have not included the letter I received from QDS solicitors or
ZZPS deb collectors. I di dask them to include all related data
including those held by their acting agents (not how I worded
it). I would expect there to notes by the person who claims to
have observed the contravention.
#Post#: 126018--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: July 28, 2026, 7:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Please post relevant documents, such as the N1SDT form with the
password and personal details (but not dates) redacted. The
original NtK I know is in the first post of this thread, but it
will be important to see things like the Particulars of Claim on
the N1SDT because the NtK said it was issued because "Driver
left site designated for customer parking only", whatever that
nonsense actually means, and it's important for us not to forget
this point.
We should also remember that your original appeal was on
non-compliance with PoFA 2012. Your defence should expand on
this a little by stating which part of the legislation was not
complied with.
#Post#: 126022--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: July 28, 2026, 7:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: DontStandForNonsense link ---
>
> Thank you. Yes I returned the AOS a few days ago.
>
> I have now since received the a file from them relating to my
FOI request. It essentially contains:
>
> 1. Their original Notice to keeper
> 2. Copy of our original appeal
> 3. A copy of the letter they sent requesting the full name and
address of the driver
> 4. A copy of our reply to their request
> 5. A copy of their letter rejecting our appeal (this is the
one I found late because it had been emailed to me and was in my
junk folder)
> 6. 3 images taken of the front of my van timed a few seconds
apart (seemed to have been taken by a human because of the
straight on angle)
> 7. A screen shot of a system page showing the vehicle details
> 8. A screen shot of a system showing the vehicle keeper
details (name, address of the keeper)
> 9. A screen shot of a system showing the details and status of
the PCN (Rejected status, Received date, Name of Keeper, That it
is with the debt collector, location of contravention, rejection
reasons - left site, POPLA ref )
>
> There are no images of a driver at all and by extension, none
of the driver 'leaving site', no notes of the incident by the
observer of what was observed or details of the driver, and no
letters that may have been sent by any solicitors or deb
collectors acting since on their behalf. So for instance, they
have not included the letter I received from QDS solicitors or
ZZPS debt collectors. I di dask them to include all related data
including those held by their acting agents (not how I worded
it). I would expect there to notes by the person who claims to
have observed the contravention.
>
--- End Quote ---
Link to related docs
HTML https://photos.app.goo.gl/SFifQwLD1Kxi59A6A
#Post#: 126026--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: July 28, 2026, 8:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
The N1SDT claim form also, please, I couldn't see it there.
#Post#: 126032--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: July 28, 2026, 8:42 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: jfollows link ---
>
> The N1SDT claim form also, please, I couldn't see it there.
>
--- End Quote ---
Thought I had added it. I've now definitely done it again.
SHould be showing now.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 7
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page