DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 110782--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: February 23, 2026, 9:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Ignore ZZPS.
Come back when you get a Letter of Claim from a solicitor.
Search the forum for
ZZPS
and
UKPC
in the meantime.
You are now too late to appeal to POPLA.
#Post#: 110788--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: February 23, 2026, 9:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Are they not obliged to send letters like this by post as well?
No wonder why they insist on using their website to appeal.
Forces you to give your email. I wonder how many people lose the
right to appeal because of missing they email while expecting it
in the post.
#Post#: 110790--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DWMB2
Date: February 23, 2026, 9:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: DontStandForNonsense link ---
>
> Are they not obliged to send letters like this by post as
well?
>
--- End Quote ---
No - if you appeal electronically, they're entitled to respond
electronically.
--- Quote from: DontStandForNonsense link ---
>
> No wonder why they insist on using their website to appeal
--- End Quote ---
They don't insist on online appeals - the notice you received
outlines that appeals can be submitted either by post or online.
Online is generally recommended because it's free, and there's
less risk of post going missing
#Post#: 110799--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: February 23, 2026, 10:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Ok,
Would a solicitors letter be sent by email or post?
#Post#: 110800--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: InterCity125
Date: February 23, 2026, 10:45 am
---------------------------------------------------------
A Letter of Claim would normally be sent by post to the same
postal address as the original PCN.
#Post#: 110813--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: February 23, 2026, 11:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: InterCity125 link ---
>
> A Letter of Claim would normally be sent by post to the same
postal address as the original PCN.
>
--- End Quote ---
Hope they don't catch us out again!
#Post#: 116981--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: April 25, 2026, 8:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: b789 link ---
>
> You can email them back with the following response:
>
> [quote]Subject: Re: PCN [insert reference] – Driver Details
Not Required
>
> Dear UKPC Appeals Department,
>
> Thank you for your template fishing attempt.
>
> Your request for the driver’s details is noted and declined.
You have already been informed that I am the keeper, and that
your Notice to Keeper fails to comply with the mandatory
requirements of Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act
2012. As such, you cannot transfer liability from the
unidentified driver to me.
>
> If your staff are unable to understand why your NtK is
non‑compliant, I suggest you review Schedule 4 more
carefully. Keeper liability is a strict statutory regime:
partial or almost compliance is not compliance. You do not get
to rely on PoFA unless you meet every requirement, which you
have not.
>
> Your continued attempts to obtain the driver’s identity are
noted. I will not be assisting you in curing your own statutory
defects.
>
> You now have two options:
>
> [indent]1. Issue a POPLA code, or
> 2. Cancel the PCN and save us both further wasted
time.[/indent]
>
> If you require guidance on my position, you may refer to the
response famously given in Arkell v Pressdram (1971).
>
> I look forward to your POPLA code or your confirmation of
cancellation.
>
> Yours faithfully,
>
> [Name]
--- End Quote ---
[/quote]
Okay so we've received a letter from their solicitors. Would
really appreciate help with next steps or how to respond.
Here is the link Solicitors Letter P1
HTML https://photos.app.goo.gl/UM4dq3pdHAUULKxG7
#Post#: 116986--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: April 25, 2026, 8:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote ---
> Come back when you get a Letter of Claim from a solicitor.
--- End Quote ---
What you have received and posted isn’t.
#Post#: 116990--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: DontStandForNonsense
Date: April 25, 2026, 9:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I don't understand?
Are you saying the letter isn't a letter of claim?
#Post#: 116991--------------------------------------------------
Re: Issued with a ticket (NTK) for being parked in a retail park
DIR By: jfollows
Date: April 25, 2026, 9:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: DontStandForNonsense link ---
>
> I don't understand?
>
> Are you saying the letter isn't a letter of claim?
>
--- End Quote ---
Yes
It would say that it was and it would give you 30 days to pay if
it were.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 7
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page