URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 100030--------------------------------------------------
       Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: NTIAEP
       Date: November 27, 2025, 6:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Salutations to all from me.
       and "When it rains...it pours!!!" springs to mind.
       Have received another PCN, this time for the above-mentioned
       alleged contravention.  Details are:
       PCN
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/nx65qfyf5kwxdcqkt4u20/20251118_MF17VHY_PCN-AF21017637_Uphall-Lane_20251021.pdf?rlkey=908sl06695uuyio82xrw1f0u8&st=kkpes0ia&dl=0
       CCTV footage
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/b55i44v2mbmhoroskwzyn/AF21017637_video.mp4?rlkey=j4tjswt31luimojovti8fjbwd&st=b7aqd0c7&dl=0
       GSV
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/iPuKGbk77d7BDzHDA
       Will be submitting initial reps along the following lines:
       1) using [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] argument of missing
       mandatory language pertaining to "...Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of...."
       2) tree foliage on the nearside along with height of the signs
       did not give a clear and unrestricted view of the said signs;
       3) no advance warning signs with the enforced times, just the
       following (see pic)
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/173o3am82az9cinxq0eb2/AF21017637_current-advance-warning-signs.jpg?rlkey=k0ln9lmm8hphcjok2z4w6pmw5&st=06qmsusm&dl=0.<br
       /> Is this a valid [regulatory] argument?
       Can't use the "Term-time only" get-out clause anymore as most
       (not all!!) have been taped over.
       Thoughts/opinions please before I shoot it off to Redbridge
       council.
       Regards - NTIAEP
       #Post#: 100078--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 27, 2025, 10:06 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I like it.
       #Post#: 104348--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: NTIAEP
       Date: January 2, 2026, 2:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       As expected, Redbridge rejected my reps.....so London Tribunals
       hearing in the pipeline.
       #Post#: 104355--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: January 2, 2026, 3:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What did they say?
       #Post#: 121713--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: June 13, 2026, 3:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       On it.
       #Post#: 123733--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 4, 2026, 5:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       2260001818  ;D Seemples: no lessor signature on hire agreement
       (plus no letter of acceptance to the lessor before the new PCN
       was issued).
       #Post#: 123840--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: NTIAEP
       Date: July 5, 2026, 3:17 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=24]Hippocrates[/member] - afgaristo!!
       #Post#: 123847--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: July 5, 2026, 4:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If Garry's toe met Sally's mouth......
       Efkaristo e parakalo file mou.
       Thanks you and please my friend.
       #Post#: 123850--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: July 5, 2026, 5:39 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Outcome
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nBHzi_uniq1sU7aj-d00nkCRcGmAJ4WA/view.
       #Post#: 123851--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge /
       53j-FailingToComplyWithRestrictionsOnVehiclesEnteringAPedestrianZone
       / Uphall Rd IG1
   DIR By: roythebus
       Date: July 5, 2026, 7:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I like it.:)
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page