DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 112660--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: Jackisback123 Date: March 10, 2026, 6:33 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Fixing links for OP:
Letter of Claim:
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/sdrPpZm5
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/7tPnPdYR
And the final demand letter a few weeks earlier:
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/KjkYc7DT
There were these documents that accompanied the letter of claim:
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/B5jHGHT5
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/21ssZkSw
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/DD0gcwMy
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/C3zm6F91
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/7NGK3G1H
And reply forms:
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/YTFsB5SZ
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/W43G10c0
Link
HTML https://ibb.co/jZJ2rGJH
#Post#: 112662--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 6:34 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[s]Will re-upload! seems like the link function / image upload
function is being a little glitchy[/s]
THANK YOU!
#Post#: 112669--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: Jackisback123 Date: March 10, 2026, 6:58 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Is there, or can you get, a photo of the sign on the wall?
They seem to be saying parking was prohibited, but also that you
agreed to pay a parking charge, which is contradictory.
They can't say you're liable in contract if there was no
contract because parking is prohibited.
Please can you also post a copy of the adjucator's decision?
#Post#: 112672--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 7:20 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Posting multiple images doesn't seem to work for me so will post
them individually:
Evidence pack I used of operator's photos of car and warning
signs on wall -
HTML https://ibb.co/LhpG2vBR
#Post#: 112675--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 7:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Part 2:
HTML https://ibb.co/bMQDhW5s
#Post#: 112676--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 7:25 am
---------------------------------------------------------
3:
HTML https://ibb.co/1FRW3Pd
#Post#: 112678--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 7:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Warning sign Operator uploaded to IAS appeal:
HTML https://ibb.co/zTLY9Kzf
#Post#: 112680--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 7:27 am
---------------------------------------------------------
And screenshot of adjudicator's decision:
HTML https://ibb.co/nMP72LcP
#Post#: 112683--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: owillow99 Date: March 10, 2026, 7:36 am
---------------------------------------------------------
This is the image the operator took which shows car park
entrance at back -
HTML https://ibb.co/MxGN9Gw9
*notice that there isn't any visible signs on the car park
entrance, something the Operator claimed during their Prima
Facie Case in the appeal that someone had taken them down:
HTML https://ibb.co/n86htccF
And images I took of car park after receiving the ticket:
HTML https://ibb.co/pBRjVZkM
HTML https://ibb.co/zKpDYC9
HTML https://ibb.co/xtBNvLKK
If you notice there isn't any difference - nothing was removed
or changed on car park entrance.
#Post#: 112687--------------------------------------------------
Re: PCN for parking w/o any visible signage - Appeal dismissed b
y IAS.
By: Jackisback123 Date: March 10, 2026, 8:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I have found this
HTML https://www.reddit.com/r/bristol/comments/ejxtx2/forbidding_parking_signs/<br
/>thread (archived link
HTML http://web.archive.org/web/20241202135221/https://www.reddit.com/r/bristol/comments/ejxtx2/forbidding_parking_signs/)<br
/>on Reddit, pertaining to 'Forbidding Signs'.
Guess whose signage it is?
[img width=720
height=960]
HTML https://i.ibb.co/XwpQT6N/0md-Y2oz-d.webp[/img]
[quote]In court, I claimed that as the sign was an absolute
prohibition on parking no contract for parking could be entered
into, in order to enter into a contract the sign needs to OFFER
parking for £100, it can't say "no parking, but if you park here
you pay £100 for parking". It's called a "forbidding contract"
and it's a legal nonsense ... the judge agreed with me and
[threw] the case out, [/quote]
And a starter for ten in terms of a relevant judgment from a
different case, involving a different but similar sign.
HTML https://www.parkingcowboys.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/UKPC-v-MASTERSON-Judgment.pdf
So I would say the argument here is twofold; firstly, that the
signage was not adequate but secondly, and most importantly, the
signs are not an offer, and therefore there was no acceptance,
and therefore there was no contract even if the place had been
littered with them.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page