DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
*****************************************************
#Post#: 99020--------------------------------------------------
Re: Police evidence is my defence and they still insist to prose
cute. Process is the punishment?
By: Southpaw82 Date: November 20, 2025, 9:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
How many times does the letter “r” appear in the word
“strawberry”?
#Post#: 99021--------------------------------------------------
Re: Police evidence is my defence and they still insist to prose
cute. Process is the punishment?
By: Southpaw82 Date: November 20, 2025, 9:05 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=BillyH.... link=topic=8850.msg99018#msg99018
date=1763651037]
How do we delete this account as there is no way to? I do not
trust it and want it deleted
[/quote]
Ask me nicely…
You do realise you just reported my own post to me, don’t you?
::)
#Post#: 99036--------------------------------------------------
Re: Police evidence is my defence and they still insist to prose
cute. Process is the punishment?
By: The Slithy Tove Date: November 20, 2025, 10:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=BillyH.... link=topic=8850.msg99014#msg99014
date=1763650366]
→ Your counter: “The same type-approved device recorded
150 metres in 7 seconds on its own photos. That is 48 mph. The
device cannot be correct about distance and time but wrong about
speed. The evidence is internally inconsistent and unreliable —
exclude it under s.78 PACE.”
“The distance check was only at 150 m, but the device is
accurate to 1000 m.”
→ Your counter: Doesn’t matter. The device itself measured
150 m in 7 s on the day. That’s the evidence.
[/quote]
BZZZZZ. Wrong! No it isn't. Thank you for playing.
As Southpaw suggested, there appears to be a misunderstanding
around how speed cameras work. Your average speed over 150m is
irrelevant. The laser detection measures your speed (almost)
instantaneously. It would appear that at some point you were
clocked doing 58mph regardless of your speed a few seconds
before or after.
#Post#: 99041--------------------------------------------------
Re: Police evidence is my defence and they still insist to prose
cute. Process is the punishment?
By: andy_foster Date: November 20, 2025, 11:57 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Clearly this thread, and the OP have both run their course.
Many years ago, I used to work with a very wise man called Dave.
He had a number of stylised sayings and mottos, one of the few
that I can post of a public forum was "Let it happen". Absent an
applicable context, the wisdom of his advice might seem
questionable, but the applicable context was always someone who
of their own free will had decided to ignore perfectly sensible
advice by pursuing a course of action which would invariably
harm them and nobody else.
There is nothing wrong with knowing very little about a subject.
I personally never got the hang of partial differential
equations. Whether that was a failing on my part or the part of
my maths teacher is open to debate, although he generally didn't
understand the question, so my opinion on the matter is perhaps
somewhat predictable.
Many OPs don't have the knowledge reagrding speed cameras, LA
PCN appeal procedures, and double-declutching a 1949 Routemaster
bus that we collectively do. If they did, there would be no need
for sites such as this.
However, when entitled f*cknuggets start getting into
histrionics about how the police are fraudulently refusing to
accept their somewhat "challenged" interpretation of the data,
and start trying to tell us what's what, I am usually reminded
of the teachings of Dave.
As a scientist by education, I am personally offended (hasn't
gotten me anywhere yet) by well-meaning idiots hell bent on
disproving Darwin's "survival of the fittest" theory by helping
posters who clearly neither want or deserve our help.
As has been pointed out already, the cherry on the already quite
spectacular cake was the combo move of both accusing the site's
owner of being a copper, with no basis whatsoever other than not
being unconditionally supportive of the OP's flawed claims
without having sight of the evidence, and then spamming the
moderators by misusing the report button to accuse the site's
owner of being a copper.
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page