DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 98804--------------------------------------------------
Redbridge. 53j Restricted pedestrian zone
DIR By: Dumbum
Date: November 19, 2025, 8:46 am
---------------------------------------------------------
My son has, once again, fallen foul of one of these and would
very much appreciate it if some wise and kind soul could give
the PCN the once over to see if there is any viable grounds for
appeal. Many thanks in advance
HTML https://i.ibb.co/6JV5ctvY/1000032594.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/3YGH5Ff1
HTML https://i.ibb.co/NnTwFbcK/1000032595.jpg
HTML https://ibb.co/cXYzyV4Q
#Post#: 98876--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge. 53j Restricted pedestrian zone
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: November 19, 2025, 1:32 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yet again, we see the restriction signs at an absurd height,
totally out of the motorists line of sight if safe driving is to
be achieved. Video shows what looks like a right turn into the
restriction, is this correct ?If so, there should be an advance
warning on that street.
GSV is too out-of-date to show the signs, so if you can, go back
with a camera, (phone camera OK), and see if there is an advance
warning sign. The other aspect is the absurd height of these
signs, so we could do with a measure of the height of the sign.
There seems to be some sort of collective madness in London
councils with these signs at the moment; either this, or its
devious way of making sure the signs are continually passed so
the council get loads of money from PCN penalty charges.
#Post#: 98911--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge. 53j Restricted pedestrian zone
DIR By: Dumbum
Date: November 20, 2025, 2:24 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
>
> Yet again, we see the restriction signs at an absurd height,
totally out of the motorists line of sight if safe driving is to
be achieved. Video shows what looks like a right turn into the
restriction, is this correct ?If so, there should be an advance
warning on that street.
>
> GSV is too out-of-date to show the signs, so if you can, go
back with a camera, (phone camera OK), and see if there is an
advance warning sign. The other aspect is the absurd height of
these signs, so we could do with a measure of the height of the
sign. There seems to be some sort of collective madness in
London councils with these signs at the moment; either this, or
its devious way of making sure the signs are continually passed
so the council get loads of money from PCN penalty charges.
>
--- End Quote ---
Thanks. He has to go back to the area soon. I’ve suggested he
takes some pictures and check for a sign
#Post#: 98915--------------------------------------------------
Re: Redbridge. 53j Restricted pedestrian zone
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: November 20, 2025, 3:23 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Why is this a Pedestrian and Cycle Zone?
'pedestrian and cycle zone”
an area—
(a)
which has been laid out to improve amenity for pedestrians [F14,
drivers of electric scooters being used in a trial] and
cyclists; and
(b)
to which the entry of vehicles, except [F15electric scooters
being used in a trial and] pedal cycles, is prohibited or
restricted
It's a road without any improvements 'laid out' that I can see.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1