URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 98274--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: b789
       Date: November 15, 2025, 10:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Liffey link ---
       >
       > Ok, thank you. I was a bit concerned as you said this argument
       would ultimately need to convince a Judge. Does that mean
       ParkingEye will take me to court?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Possibly.
       #Post#: 98331--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: ixxy
       Date: November 16, 2025, 3:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The bottom line is any appeal based on the defence given will be
       rejected, Parkingeye won't accept their PCN isn't POFA
       compliant. An appeal to POPLA is also unlikely to be successful.
       This is not because either body routinely reject appeals, it is
       because the defence relies on an interpretation of the
       legislation that even the experts on here disagree on.
       
       After that you will get lots of letters from debt collectors.
       Eventually you will get a letter of claim. At that point it may
       go to court. I don't think we know of a case won on this
       defence, although that's often because cases don't reach court
       or there are stronger defence arguments.
       The driver didn't follow the car park rules and unless you as
       the keeper name the driver they can  come after you for the PCN.
       Not paying the invoice is a breach of contract they can
       successfully pursue you for.
       Parkingeye are known to be more litigious tha many private
       parking companies. The real question is are you feeling lucky
       and are you prepared to engage with the court process?
       #Post#: 98332--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: b789
       Date: November 16, 2025, 3:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It will also depend on whether ParkingEye are feeling lucky. If
       not, they'll farm it out to DCB Legal to issue the claim and if
       that is the case, there definitely will be no hearing as it will
       be discontinued as long as it is defended.
       If PE decide to make claim using their in-house legal team, then
       there is more chance of it going as far as a hearing. You won't
       know until an LoC is issued which route they are going to take.
       #Post#: 98341--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: Liffey
       Date: November 16, 2025, 4:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: ixxy link ---
       >
       > The bottom line is any appeal based on the defence given will
       be rejected, Parkingeye won't accept their PCN isn't POFA
       compliant. An appeal to POPLA is also unlikely to be successful.
       This is not because either body routinely reject appeals, it is
       because the defence relies on an interpretation of the
       legislation that even the experts on here disagree on.
       >
       > After that you will get lots of letters from debt collectors.
       Eventually you will get a letter of claim. At that point it may
       go to court. I don't think we know of a case won on this
       defence, although that's often because cases don't reach court
       or there are stronger defence arguments.
       >
       > The driver didn't follow the car park rules and unless you as
       the keeper name the driver they can  come after you for the PCN.
       Not paying the invoice is a breach of contract they can
       successfully pursue you for.
       >
       > Parkingeye are known to be more litigious tha many private
       parking companies. The real question is are you feeling lucky
       and are you prepared to engage with the court process?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I didn't realise the prospects at POPLA were so bleak. I found
       some decisions that I thought were helpful, but to be clear
       you're saying they are not?
       POPLA Appeal 6060637496 (2016)
       POPLA Appeal 6061796103 (2016)
       POPLA Appeal 6160338204 (2017)
       #Post#: 98354--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: ixxy
       Date: November 16, 2025, 5:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       POPLA works for cases where there is a proper defense,
       frustration of contract, bad signage, NTKs issued outside of the
       POFA 14 window. They are unlikely to side with a motorist over
       something like interpretation of the wording of the legislation.
       They are there to provide some level of independent appeals
       service, albeit paid for by the industry. IAS on the other
       hand......
       In your case you would be relying on a technicality as in the
       spirit of the way the legal side works you owe them the PCN
       value or you will have breached the contract.
       People dont like the private parking industry, with good reason
       with some of the operators, but they do provide a necessary
       service which motorists normally benefit from even if they don't
       realise it. There is also a sound legal basis for the way they
       operate. Many people who come onto the forums just want to avoid
       paying legit parking charge. People who assume they have a good
       case for appeal often naively just appeal without seeking
       advice. Depending on the operator many of these appeals are
       granted, we just don't hear about them. Its often the land owner
       who sets the appeal crtieria, so places like supermarkets often
       insist a PCN is cancelled if a receipt can be provided as
       evidence of being a genuine customer, even if the car park rules
       weren't  adhered to.
       #Post#: 98368--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: Liffey
       Date: November 16, 2025, 7:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So it's worth appealing in case the landowner is amenable? Is
       that what you're saying?
       #Post#: 98649--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN Parking Eye Gale St Dagenham
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: November 18, 2025, 7:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've received some moderator reports about the QR code being
       visible. Unless you are concerned that someone might pay the PCN
       for you, there's little to fear. But if you do want it removed,
       if you can share a copy with the QR code redacted I'd be happy
       to remove the unredacted one.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page