URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 97624--------------------------------------------------
       ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to fat
       igue
       By: timewilltell Date: November 10, 2025, 4:43 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all
       I’m the registered keeper and have received a ParkingEye PCN for
       3 hours 45 minutes at South Mimms Welcome Break services. The
       driver stopped because they were extremely tired and needed to
       rest/sleep for safety. After sleeping, they had no idea how long
       they had been parked and left straight away, after refuelling at
       the BP garage.
       There were no clear signs about a 2-hour limit, and the ANPR
       photos on the PCN are very poor. I've blacked out the reg plate
       on the images themselves and below the images.
       Is it worth appealing, and if so, what’s the best way to draft
       an initial appeal?
       Thanks in advance for any guidance!
  HTML https://ibb.co/d4MZqm8F
  HTML https://ibb.co/xSMF3SVf
       #Post#: 97638--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: InterCity125 Date: November 11, 2025, 2:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Wait for the others to double check but it seems like the NtK is
       not PoFA compliant as it never invites the RK to pay the charge?
       PoFA Sch. 4 para 9(2)(e)(i)
       #Post#: 97652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: timewilltell Date: November 11, 2025, 4:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok will do, thanks for replying
       #Post#: 97740--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: b789 Date: November 11, 2025, 1:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is no legal obligation on the known keeper (the recipient
       of the Notice to Keeper (NtK)) to reveal the identity of the
       unknown driver and no inference or assumptions can be made.
       The NtK is not compliant with all the requirements of PoFA which
       means that if the unknown driver is not identified, they cannot
       transfer liability for the charge from the unknown driver to the
       known keeper.
       Use the following as your appeal. No need to embellish or remove
       anything from it:
       [quote]I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your
       'parking charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement
       and I will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to
       your client landowner.
       As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
       substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
       admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
       can be drawn. ParkingEye has relied on contract law allegations
       of breach against the driver only.
       The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
       ParkingEye have no hope at POPLA, so you are urged to save us
       both a complete waste of time and cancel the PCN.[/quote]
       Come back when you get a response.
       #Post#: 97878--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: timewilltell Date: November 12, 2025, 9:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Amazing, thank you so much [member=26]b789[/member].
       I'll submit my appeal verbatim as you suggest and will you know
       when I get a response.
       #Post#: 100181--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: timewilltell Date: November 28, 2025, 5:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I’ve received a generic response from Parking Eye. You can see
       that here:

  HTML https://ibb.co/d4Q3t0SN

  HTML https://ibb.co/S7dCcrSN

       I assume I can ignore this and see if they provide a POPLA code
       after 28 days.
       #Post#: 100186--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: InterCity125 Date: November 28, 2025, 5:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=timewilltell link=topic=8722.msg100181#msg100181
       date=1764330146]
       I’ve received a generic response from Parking Eye. You can see
       that here:

  HTML https://ibb.co/d4Q3t0SN

  HTML https://ibb.co/S7dCcrSN

       I assume I can ignore this and see if they provide a POPLA code
       after 28 days.
       [/quote]
       Neither of the images open.
       #Post#: 100190--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: timewilltell Date: November 28, 2025, 6:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apologies, not sure what happened there. These should work:
  HTML https://ibb.co/hRdLYBTK
  HTML https://ibb.co/JWmKKj0C
       #Post#: 100200--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: b789 Date: November 28, 2025, 7:05 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can respond to that phishing exercise with the following:
       [quote]Re: Parking Charge Notice [ref]
       Dear Sir or Madam,
       I refer to your letter dated 28 November 2025.
       First, your assertion that I “stated that [I was] not the driver
       of the vehicle at the date and time of the breach” is entirely
       false. I said no such thing. My appeal made it perfectly clear
       that I am the registered keeper, that I dispute the charge, and
       that there would be no admission as to the identity of the
       driver and no inferences or assumptions could be drawn.
       Your attempt to rewrite my appeal into something it never said
       is, at best, sloppily incompetent and, at worst, deliberately
       mendacious. It gives the distinct impression that nobody at
       ParkingEye has actually read my appeal and that you are simply
       spraying out boilerplate bluster in the hope that keepers will
       be bullied into naming a driver.
       For the avoidance of doubt, I will not be identifying the
       driver. There is no legal obligation on a registered keeper to
       disclose a driver’s identity and you have no entitlement to that
       personal data.
       You then recite selected snippets from Schedule 4 of the
       Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, as if parroting paragraphs
       9(2)(b) and 9(2)(f) somehow cures the other defects in your
       Notice to Keeper. It does not. Keeper liability can only arise
       where an operator has complied with ALL the mandatory
       requirements of Schedule 4, not just the ones it finds
       convenient to quote after the event. Your NtK is not fully
       compliant with all of those requirements; partial or
       “substantial” compliance is insufficient in law. Consequently,
       you cannot transfer liability for this charge from the unknown
       driver to me as keeper.
       My position is therefore unchanged:
       • I deny any liability or contractual agreement.
       • I will not be naming the driver.
       • You cannot rely on Schedule 4 PoFA to pursue me as keeper.
       You must now either cancel this charge or issue a POPLA code
       without further prevarication. Any continued attempt to
       misrepresent my appeal, to misstate the effect of PoFA, or to
       pursue me as if I were liable despite your own non-compliant
       paperwork will simply form part of a formal complaint to your
       client and the relevant regulatory and supervisory bodies.
       Yours faithfully,
       [Name]
       Registered Keeper[/quote]
       #Post#: 100207--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ParkingEye PCN - SOUTH MIMMS - overstay / safety stop due to
        fatigue
       By: timewilltell Date: November 28, 2025, 7:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Absolutely amazing! Thank you so much!  ;D
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page