URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 97022--------------------------------------------------
       New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: The Slithy Tove Date: November 6, 2025, 4:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It has often been mentioned on these forums (and its
       predecessor) that when a new driver (less than 2 years on full
       licence) gets 6 points or more, that their licence is revoked
       and that they need to start all over again. It has also been
       stated that this is an administrative process by the DVLA and so
       the court doesn't really get a say in what happens.
       However, there's a new CyclingMikey video on YouTube
       (
  HTML https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oq-EzEdfeHY)
       showing that there
       seems to be another option. Starting at about the 4:00 mark, he
       reports that the errant new driver managed to plead (what he
       called exceptional circumstances) to get a 1 month ban for their
       mobile phone offence, rather than having those 6 points and
       getting their licence revoked.
       So it seems it may not necessarily be a slam-dunk revocation in
       such cases if you have an appropriate hardship case. Not going
       to discuss the rights and wrongs of whether this is appropriate,
       but there it is.
       #Post#: 97037--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: Southpaw82 Date: November 6, 2025, 6:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       None of that is new. It’s accepted that a court can impose a ban
       instead of six points to sidestep the revocation. However, it is
       contrary to the sentencing guidelines (and the will of
       Parliament) to do so. The court would need very good reasons to
       do it.
       #Post#: 97038--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: The Slithy Tove Date: November 6, 2025, 6:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Southpaw82 link=topic=8671.msg97037#msg97037
       date=1762431072]
       However, it is contrary to the sentencing guidelines (and the
       will of Parliament) to do so.
       [/quote]I think that's the real point.
       #Post#: 97257--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: NewJudge Date: November 7, 2025, 9:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       “Mikey” is a little misleading.
       He said “She has the option to plead Exceptional Hardship which
       would change the revocation of her licence potentially to a
       disqualification. The Magistrates gave her a one month
       disqualification.”
       That is incorrect.
       A formal “exceptional hardship” argument is only available to
       those facing a totting-up disqualification. Further, even if it
       was available and was successful, it does not “change the
       revocation to a disqualification.”
       As above, a defendant may well ask the court to consider a short
       disqualification instead of points. The Magistrates’ guidelines
       say this:
       “An offender liable for an endorsement which will cause the
       licence to be revoked under the new drivers’ provisions may ask
       the court to disqualify rather than impose points. This will
       avoid the requirement to take a further test. Generally, this
       would be inappropriate since it would circumvent the clear
       intention of Parliament.”
       But the "Adult Bench Book" also contains this:
       "The court should consider the impact that ordering six or more
       points will have on a new
       driver. Ordering less than six points or a disqualification will
       not lead to a DVLA revocation of
       the driving licence."
       Of course a simple way to address the disqualification option
       would be to make the New Driver’s Act applicable not only to
       drivers who gain six or more points, but also to those who are
       disqualified for any length of time. It has always struck me as
       perverse that a new driver who commits (say) two minor speeding
       offences will see his licence revoked, whereas one committing an
       alcohol or drug related driving offence which might attract a
       ban of a considerable length does not.
       It is true that the court has the power to order a
       "disqualification until test passed". But apart from the fact
       that many Magistrates seem not to be aware that they have that
       power, making it discretionary would not be such a strong
       deterrent.
       But that’s an argument for another day.
       #Post#: 97294--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: andy_foster Date: November 7, 2025, 11:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With respect, I believe that you are putting the cart before the
       horse.
       Nothing in statute says that the court cannot consider
       "exceptional" hardship when exercising their discretion in any
       sentencing - however, the term is explicitly used in the totting
       up legislation as no hardship other than exceptional hardship
       may be taken into consideration when exercising their discretion
       to deviate from the otherwise mandatory 6 month (minimum) ban
       for totting up.
       #Post#: 97321--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: NewJudge Date: November 7, 2025, 1:28 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, point taken Andy.
       I did say a formal EH argument and I was using it in its strict
       sense when referring to totting up.  That has restrictions (only
       one argument using he same reasons within three years) which an
       argument for a single offence or ND revocation would not.
       Although I may be wrong, it strikes me that Mikey was conflating
       the two procedures (totting up disqualification and New Drivers'
       revocation). I don't believe that he would otherwise have used
       the term. He also gave quite misleading information when
       explaining the six points/disqualification choice.
       #Post#: 97335--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: Southpaw82 Date: November 7, 2025, 2:01 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A cycling activist giving duff advice on motoring law? Say it
       ain’t so!
       #Post#: 97398--------------------------------------------------
       Re: New Drivers and disqualification/revocation
       By: The Slithy Tove Date: November 8, 2025, 6:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Southpaw82 link=topic=8671.msg97335#msg97335
       date=1762545711]
       A cycling activist giving duff advice on motoring law? Say it
       ain’t so!
       [/quote]
       Hence why my OP said, "what he called exceptional
       circumstances," knowing that it was likely he wasn't using the
       correct term that was applied inside the courtroom.
       *****************************************************