URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 18656--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: slapdash
       Date: March 31, 2024, 7:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       With the written word the adjudicator has to decide its meaning
       in the event of any uncertainty. There is no opportunity for
       those areas to be clarified.
       In a personal hearing the opportunity exists to clarify these
       areas.
       #Post#: 18658--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: March 31, 2024, 9:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I see - thanks
       #Post#: 18737--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: March 31, 2024, 7:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: BH1001 link ---
       >
       > Can I ask why a personal hearing is preferable to a postal
       one?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       To avoid the sort of disaster you see in these threads:
  HTML http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=149680
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/warwickshire-cc-pcn-code-24-not-within-markings-of-bay-lakin-road-warwick/msg5240/#msg5240
       #Post#: 18771--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: April 1, 2024, 7:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Okay thanks for the heads up
       #Post#: 19261--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: April 8, 2024, 3:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Quick update:
       I've received a letter from TfL notifiying me that they are
       cancelling the 2nd PCN due to an 'administrative error'.
       I've requested a telephone hearing for the original PCN (i.e.
       the one that I've posted up) and I'm awaiting confirmation of
       the date and time
       
       #Post#: 19314--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 8, 2024, 12:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=390]BH1001[/member] can you please post up the notice of
       rejection, and the case history from evidence item D? There
       might be a flaw in the notice of rejection word that we can
       exploit.
       If you don't have the evidence in PDF form, you can call the
       tribunal and they will email it to you on request.
       #Post#: 19558--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: April 12, 2024, 7:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Okay
       I called the London Tribunal and I've been informed that they
       have not been notified by TfL that one of the PCN's was being
       cancelled.  I had to point to advisor to the paragraph in the
       Case Summary document which makes reference to this.  The
       advisor said that they will be informing their line manager of
       this development.  I had called for a copy of the letter that
       TfL sent notifying me that this PCN had been cancelled but,
       naturally, they have not been able to provide this as TfL have
       failed to inform them of this development.  Unfortunately my OH
       tossed the letter away so I do not have a copy myself.  I do
       recall that they had said that an administrative error had been
       made and that they had informed the London Tribunal of this, but
       that has turned out not to be the case.  I've requested a copy
       of that letter from TfL and they've told me that a copy has been
       generated and will be sent in the post - I'll post a copy of
       that up when it arrives.
       The advisor was also able to share that the hearing has been
       scheduled for 24th of this month and that a letter is in the
       post confirming this - it hasn't arrived yet but as soon as it
       does I will post those details here as well.
       #Post#: 19713--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: April 14, 2024, 6:12 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=390]BH1001[/member] sorry to tell you but you're taking
       a bit of an old-fashioned approach to everything, it is 2024
       after all.
       First and foremost, call the tribunal first thing and ask them
       to change the comms preference from post to email, this way
       you'll get updates from the tribunal at the same time as TFL,
       rather than a week or so later (Royal Mail isn't what it used to
       be
  HTML https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67401045).
       You can then ask
       them to email you a copy of the scheduling letter and you'll get
       it immediately, rather than some time maybe never.
       Secondly as for the cancelled PCN, you can simply look it up on
  HTML https://tfl.gov.uk/modes/driving/challenge-a-pcn
       (if it's
       cancelled, take a screenshot).
       I had also asked to see the notice of rejection because some of
       TFL's wording is flawed, see these cases:
       Nayeem Haque v Transport for London (2220767288, 15 November
       2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KavlK0nNvWS2eI9ICkqjBQRg9-L-2mHc/view
       Mike Welch v Transport for London (2230428700, 18 November 2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ijJW4O3zHz-LOkVRi4QHmdf983n1yyJ8/view
       Lubavitch Synagogue v Transport for London (2230535074, 5
       February 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1xokOkjdoJf0e5CBjBP7smnErCrMxps0m/view
       Commercial Plant Services Ltd v Transport for London
       (2240018512, 12 February 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qwj3XYfPvFZBh-ag3HYuQEUHtFXwxvHf/view
       Mathew Mathai v Transport for London (2240062219, 15 March 2024)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1QoDnU5djhqtHMDDHbPiHIhVOC7KmHxIZ/view
       However I cannot check if this applies to your case as you've
       not shown us the notice of rejection, so please upload it so
       that we can take a look.
       #Post#: 19736--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: April 15, 2024, 6:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Another thing I didn't know I could/should do - you live and
       learn  ;)
       I have found the PCN on the website and it is confirmed there
       that it has been cancelled.  I have requested a copy of the
       rejection letter and been advised that this is in the post.
       I've updated my comms preferences and received the following by
       email
       "Please be advised your hearing will now be conducted via
       telephone call as per your request. The adjudicator will call
       you on 24/04/2024 at 10:30 to proceed with the hearing".
       How do we arrange for an advocate/advisor to be on the call?
       #Post#: 19886--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: April 18, 2024, 4:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Here's the letter - interesting that it mentions my
       representations when I never actually appealed this one
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/U1KH6We
       *****************************************************
       Page 6 of 8
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page