URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9945--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 12, 2023, 12:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > The bottom of the sign is over 10 mtrs from ground level
       --- End Quote ---
       You sure of that !
       10 metres is 32 feet; a double-decker bus is 14 feet, so more
       than double the height of a London bus. Something wrong
       somewhere !
       #Post#: 9951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: November 12, 2023, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Oh yes well spotted - sorry I meant feet not metres  :D
       That makes a bit if a difference, but would 10 feet not be too
       much either?
       #Post#: 9956--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 12, 2023, 1:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: BH1001 link ---
       >
       > Oh yes well spotted - sorry I meant feet not metres  :D
       >
       > That makes a bit if a difference, but would 10 feet not be too
       much either?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       It's too high for me, but I'm not an adjudicator. Problem is if
       the sign is too low, a lorry or bus will obscure it, if too
       high, the motorist will miss seeing it !
       #Post#: 9959--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: November 12, 2023, 1:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So is there nothing in the guidance that stipulates how high or
       low the sign needs to be?  I looked but couldn't find anything
       ...
       #Post#: 9972--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 12, 2023, 4:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Whilst there may be nothing, councils and also TfL are under a
       duty to place such signage such as to clearly convey to drivers
       the restriction. Of course, whether signs are adequate or not is
       subjective. For TfL all is perfection, so you'd have to put the
       argument on inadequacy to an adjudicator.
       #Post#: 9973--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: November 12, 2023, 4:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Okay well then wish me luck
       #Post#: 9977--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 12, 2023, 4:25 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: BH1001 link ---
       >
       > Okay well then wish me luck
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       OK then. Good Luck !
       #Post#: 10242--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: November 14, 2023, 4:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: BH1001 link ---
       >
       > I will go over and take some pictures
       >
       > Is there any defence regarding unlawful signage?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       No, but there's a defence of inadequate signage. I suggest you
       show us the photos you've taken so we can advise you on the
       strength of your case.
       #Post#: 10293--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: BH1001
       Date: November 15, 2023, 5:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi
       Thanks for the reply
       Unfortunately I have already submitted my representations as it
       was getting a bit tight for time.
       The link to the pictures is here
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/x6LoZOK
       
       #Post#: 10508--------------------------------------------------
       Re: ULEZ non payment PCN Main Road Biggin Hill
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: November 18, 2023, 6:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don't think the photos have been taken at a particularly
       helpful angle, certainly the 2nd photo showing the driver's view
       appear to have been taken from a "convenient" angle and an
       adjudicator could well make an adverse inference from that.
       If you want to take this to the tribunal, go back to the
       junction and stand next to the "Skill Hill Lane" sign here
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/PMDCuNRFqgpG4wFAA
       and get some
       wide-angled photos showing the whole width of the road.
       As far as I can work out, the offside sign that should be
       visible to the driver emerging from the junction wouldn't be
       visible because it's turned 90 degrees and is now parallel to
       the road, but you've not taken any photos to illustrate that
       point. If that particular sign is not visible to someone pulling
       out of the junction, that's your strongest point.
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 8
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page