URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 96141--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: October 30, 2025, 5:26 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hold fire. I will be back later with a technical argument re the
       PCN. Plus advice from [member=7]mrmustard[/member]. Give me a
       chance to look at the video.
       1. The U turn signage is not clear as there is only one sign.
       2. The alleged infraction is de minimis.
       3.
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/redbridge-53j-perrymans-farm-road-failing-to-comply-with-a-pedestrian-zone-restr/msg95970/#msg9597
       In light of the above, please cancel.
       ****************
       Screenshot all pages as they usually limit to one ground of
       representation. You have 28 days from the date of service to do
       this.
       #Post#: 96233--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: LondonTraveller84
       Date: October 30, 2025, 2:36 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Awesome! Holding fire… think we have just around 4 hours left
       #Post#: 96242--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: October 30, 2025, 3:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: LondonTraveller84 link ---
       >
       > Awesome! Holding fire… think we have just around 4 hours left
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       No no no. More. Don't get spaced out by the 14 day thingy.
       #Post#: 96253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: LondonTraveller84
       Date: October 30, 2025, 5:20 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > [quote author=LondonTraveller84
       link=topic=8473.msg96233#msg96233 date=1761853009]
       > Awesome! Holding fire… think we have just around 4 hours left
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       No no no. More. Don't get spaced out by the 14 day thingy.
       [/quote]
       Got it - Physiological to respond within 14 day discount so the
       discount is held. But I guess doesn’t matter if we’re going the
       full hog to win!
       #Post#: 96255--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: LondonTraveller84
       Date: October 30, 2025, 5:24 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Hold fire. I will be back later with a technical argument re
       the PCN. Plus advice from [member=7]mrmustard[/member]. Give me
       a chance to look at the video.
       >
       > 1. The U turn signage is not clear as there is only one sign.
       >
       > 2. The alleged infraction is de minimis.
       >
       > 3.
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/redbridge-53j-perrymans-farm-road-failing-to-comply-with-a-pedestrian-zone-restr/msg95970/#msg9597
       >
       > In light of the above, please cancel.
       >
       > ****************
       >
       > Screenshot all pages as they usually limit to one ground of
       representation. You have 28 days from the date of service to do
       this.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       So I’ll send a appeal now stating  contravention didn’t occur
       with the following 2 reason
       1. The U turn signage is not clear as there is only one sign
       (and at a location difficult to see when turning as one would be
       looking for pedestrians and potential oncoming danger?)
       2. The alleged infraction is de minimis.
       Is point 3 more for information only as an example of another
       case won? Or is it referring to also mentioning ‘missing
       mandatory information as provided at
       Para. 4 (8 ) (v)’ as an other reason? Or -‘ I to specially
       reference the ftla post in my appeal?
       P.s all pages where copied above or are you referring to
       screenshotting the reasons shown at the appeal page?
       #Post#: 96979--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: IHateUnfairPCNs
       Date: November 5, 2025, 2:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello people. Just received this same PCN in the post, same
       location same alleged contravention: 50u - u-turn. Will make my
       own thread in the coming days but just raising a few points as
       I'm fairly local to the area.
       - As seen on the GSV when comparing dates, this no U-turn
       signage is fairly new. Never was there for many years whilst the
       no-left-turn has always been there. I always did this specific
       manoeuvre as there was, up until now, nothing prohibiting it.
       Clearly this is a response to those doing what we do however,
       surely there has to be clear and adequate signage for THOSE
       coming from York Road. This is because, well people live off
       York Road, AND there exists Mill Road which is a common rat
       route into the North West Ilford/Cranbook area (IG1 3XX)   The
       start of the No-U-Turn zone is indicated with a sign adjacent to
       Paddypower (before York Rd when travelling northbound on A123 -
       Cranbook Road). There is no indication that we are in this
       no-u-turn zone if we have not driven through Cranbook Road
       before/in the journey. This leads into my next point
       - You are unable to see the sign and be aware of the U-turn
       prohibition due to almost every car's A-pillar blocking view of
       that sign when driving right underneath it letalone turning
       right. It is also placed on the off-side rather than the near
       side. There are also no advance warning signs like there are
       with school streets and no left/right turns (precisely what the
       junction with York Road and Cranbook Road is). Surely, it should
       be mandatory to have a bigger 'white' square sign like we see in
       many other high-revenue junctions detailing the specific
       prohibitions entailing to this junction.
       #Post#: 99448--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: LondonTraveller84
       Date: November 23, 2025, 2:37 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi [member=24]Hippocrates[/member],
       I've received the response to the initial appeal although only
       saw the letter now 10 days in :( leaving only 4 days for the
       discount (if we think we can't win) and not looking good (does
       it ever) but this time the councils response has specifically
       mentioned the adjudicator and the fact that they cannot allow
       appeals on mitgating circumstances, if anything that would be a
       situation they would be able to allow appeals..
  HTML https://ibb.co/4wtWfNDX
  HTML https://ibb.co/tTXwrCts
       Await your advice on if you think we still stand a chance on
       winning this? or if I bite the bullet and pay £80 @ the
       discounted rate.
       [member=2401]IHateUnfairPCNs[/member] - The council state the
       sign is there and in their eyes as you turn you should see it,
       obviously we're disputing this as there are many factors (such
       as viewing traffic from the right, then any pedestrians on the
       left, that make it difficult to the sign instantly. As for any
       pre signange that is mandatory for this to be enforce I am not
       aware about.
       #Post#: 99533--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 24, 2025, 8:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What did you write?
       #Post#: 99534--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: LondonTraveller84
       Date: November 24, 2025, 8:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > What did you write?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Short and sweet as you always advice:
       1. The U turn signage is not clear as there is only one sign.
       2. The alleged infraction is de minimis.
       In light of the above, please cancel.
       #Post#: 99563--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Redbridge - 50u Prohibited Turn
   DIR By: IHateUnfairPCNs
       Date: November 24, 2025, 9:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1495]LondonTraveller84[/member] You're right and I'm
       delaying my reps to mine as I'm sure that I want to be fighting
       this at tribunal raising the points you mentioned as per forum
       advice (delaying reps until around the 25th day where they
       should be busy sending a charge certificate)
       As for pre-signage, it makes sense for this junction. Where a
       side road enters into a main road and the main road has some
       sort of restriction on it for x amount of yards/miles/metres...
       there must be a first sign indicating it. This is the case for
       this No U-turn zone, with the first sign being at Paddypower and
       for the opposite way being near Wellesley Road traffic lights.
       Any repeater signs are to be taken as first-time signs if the
       main sign was unable to be seen, as in this case. Our case is
       that drivers are unable to clearly see those repeater signs on
       both sides due to the angle, height and A-pillar's of cars
       blocking view of it when turning left and the immediate
       attention paid to traffic coming from the right as well as the
       pedestrian crossing. Especially when you previously didn't know
       about the restriction. To be honest, since this ticket, I have
       been paying attention to the restriction and only not doing a
       U-turn due to foreknowledge. Not due to the signs, and obviously
       now, just by experience... it is easier to see because you've
       been caught out once.
       Near where I live, there is a road known as Browning Road, E12
       and there is a bridge which is a no cars/bikes zone except for
       buses, taxis and permit holders. There are 2 signs, one nearside
       and offside AND there is a pre-sign warning of the bridge
       restriction on Rectory Road. Despite that sign existing, a
       tribunal was won because the tree slightly covered the sign and
       it was unclear/slightly invisible for those coming from
       Chesterford Road (Y-junction with Rectory Road). Surely the same
       can apply here, especially when both roads are fairly busy and
       high volume of pedestrians almost at any time of the day...
       
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 4
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page