DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 95167--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Windscreen PCN paid by Tesla 
   DIR By: NTIAEP
       Date: October 22, 2025, 9:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: zunaster link ---
       >
       > May be refrain from commenting unless you have fully read the
       question. How come you don’t know what a PCH is?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Not going to get voluntary assistance with that attitude.
       #Post#: 95186--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Windscreen PCN paid by Tesla 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 22, 2025, 10:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You have posted so much that it's difficult to sort the wheat
       from the chaff.
       What exactly is it you need help resolving?
       A far as road traffic contravention law is concerned, if a
       recipient of a NTO wishes to pay then, as they are the liable
       party under our legislation, there is no procedural impropriety
       in them doing so. However, if contractually you have a dispute
       then that's a different matter between you and them, but not the
       enforcementbauthority.
       A NTO and equivalent under any legislation within the scope of
       the forum is a legal demand upon the keeper to pay a penalty
       charge. If not paid, then the enforcing authority has the full
       might of the law with which to pursue the keeper, ultimately to
       bailiff action.
       I'll assume that, in the context of your query, PCH is personal
       contract hire. As such, it is NOT a 'hiring agreement' for the
       purposes of any road traffic legislation because these all draw
       upon the same definition, that is that the period cannot exceed
       6 months.
       This is where matters get complicated for leasing companies
       because they're prevented from making reps on the grounds that
       they are a vehicle-hire firm etc. and instead have to rely on
       the 'I was not the keeper of the vehicle' defence.
       But how any of this bears upon your issue I don't know.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page