URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 94265--------------------------------------------------
       Need some guidance
       By: Zbubuman Date: October 16, 2025, 2:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi All
       I need some guidance following the receipt of an NIP for
       speeding 27mph in a 20mph zone (speed camera). The situation is
       that this was due to a genuine medical emergency. I am a type 2
       diabetic and for the first time ever, I had an episode of
       Hypoglycemia (dangerous low level of blood sugar). The symptoms
       (cold sweat, mild tremors and lightheadedness) started as soon
       as I turned into this particular road. The road is a red route
       and I was at the time panicking and urgently trying to find
       somewhere where I could safely pull over and get my blood sugar
       back to normal. Managed to do this a few 100m down the road
       where I stopped and followed NHS/DVLA guidelines ( consume
       something high in sugar - wait 30 to 45 mins to ensure you are
       ok and then resumed my journey).
       Not sure if anyone has encountered similar cases and if this
       would constitute sufficient grounds to challenge the NIP. My
       concern ( apologies for having to say I read somewhere else) is
       that I saw some advice stating that this could make matters
       worse and the prosecutors could try to escalate to a case of
       dangerous driving.
       Any advice is welcome.
       Kind regards
       Zbubuman
       #Post#: 94270--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Need some guidance
       By: 666 Date: October 16, 2025, 4:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can't challenge a NIP. It's merely a notice, and you've now
       been notified.
       After you've named the driver, you should be offered a fixed
       penalty (£100 and 3 points), and possibly the alternative of a
       speed awareness course. The only way to "challenge" is to ignore
       these offers, and to plead not guilty at the subsequent trial.
       That is a high-risk strategy, as a guilty verdict will cost you
       c.£1,000, plus a day of your time.
       A question that may be asked is "Have you advised the DVLA of
       your condition? You must do so if "... you get disabling
       hypoglycaemia (low blood sugar) - or a medical professional has
       told you that you’re at risk of developing it."
  HTML https://www.gov.uk/diabetes-driving
       
       #Post#: 94278--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Need some guidance
       By: NewJudge Date: October 16, 2025, 4:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you use those circumstances to either defend he charge (by
       pleading not guilty) or to mitigate it to reduce the sentence,
       the court will ask itself whether it was a good idea not only to
       continue driving, but to exceed the speed limit.
       You could plead guilty and ask the court to consider that there
       are "Special Reasons" not to endorse your licence and impose
       points. My view is that they will ask themselves the same
       question if faced with that request.
       A course is likely to be offered if you are eligible and that or
       a fixed penalty is the best offer you will get.
       #Post#: 94302--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Need some guidance
       By: Zbubuman Date: October 16, 2025, 7:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you both for your advice. DVLA are aware that I have a
       medical condition and the advice is to inform them if i suffer 2
       or more episodes within 1 year. To give some further background,
       I have lived with the condition for 10 years and this is the
       first time I had an episode. In hindsight, I did bring my own
       misfortune that day. Took my insulin in the morning but was
       running a tad late so skipped B'fast, thinking I will grab a
       sandwich along the way. Errands got in the way and to make a
       long story short, I was running on a cup of coffee until the
       incident happened around 2pm.
       Going forward, I am now checking my blood sugar before I drive
       and make sure to also eat something, even if it is just a couple
       of biscuits.
       #Post#: 95436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Need some guidance
       By: Mayhem007 Date: October 24, 2025, 11:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A duress of circumstances are normally only considered if you
       felt your life was in danger imposed upon you by external
       circumstances.
       In your situation upon such a situation the court would simply
       take the view that you should not have continued driving given
       the circumstances of that present medical situation, as this
       would be deemed to be a danger to other road users.
       Sorry to hear of your medical health, which appears to occur
       occasionally under circumstances when you are driving.
       #Post#: 95444--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Need some guidance
       By: andy_foster Date: October 24, 2025, 12:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       To clarify, for circumstances to constitute a defence, as
       opposed to mitigation, the accused would have to believed that
       there was a real likelihood of death or serious injury to
       himself or another and that breaking the law was a reasonable
       way to reduce that likelihood.
       Other jurisdictions have a defence of necessity - where choosing
       a lesser evil can be justified, but here, it is only effectively
       where you have no choice - the risk of death or serious injury
       being beyond that which someone could be deemed to choose.
       Whether an action was reasonable, when facing some peril, should
       be assessed from the perspective of a reasonable person facing
       such peril with decisions made in the heat of the moment, but
       your choice to continue driving on the basis that you didn't
       want to get a fine for stopping on a red route (taking a mildly
       cyncial view) is not a position I would like to have to try to
       defend.
       *****************************************************