URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 9006--------------------------------------------------
       Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard Street
   DIR By: mg82
       Date: November 2, 2023, 9:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi All, hope you can help me out with this one as it doesn't
       feel right.
       I was driving in bad weather and following satnav, not a defence
       I know, but my actions weren't deliberate.
       I was approaching the rail station along Garrard Street
       (eastbound direction), and exited across the red brick road onto
       Station Road - where the 'bus lane' / authorised vehicles
       section is.
       I just got the PCN a few days ago, and would like to build a
       defence in the representations and then if these are rejected,
       take it to the adjudicator.
       Things that feel wrong about this:
       1. Timestamp error on the photo vs the PCN. All the camera
       footage (except the weird black and white one) show 16:42, but
       the PCN states 16:43.
       2. No bus lane (just authorised traffic) although the
       contravention is for being a bus lane.
       3. The Road markings are incomplete and worn.
       4. No actual evidence of the contravention, ie no accompanying
       photos of signs, times of operation, etc - or me driving through
       them.
       5. No space for turning to avoid the bus and taxi road, and no
       warnings further up the street.
       6. Are the road signs correct? There is a lot of debate on here
       about that, but I would like to hear whether they are in your
       opinion.
       7. The PCN has a number of errors:
       a) Mentions a Tick Box for the representations (A-G), but no
       tick box provided.
       b) Mixed terminology - says ' OTHER GROUNDS', then the box you
       enter the representation into says 'Other Representations'.
       c) 'Other Grounds' refers to 'set out those reasons in full in
       the box on the following page'. There is no next page, just the
       box below.
       Would really appreciate any help in disqualifying, or refining
       these and making them into a reasonable representation. Or help
       with signs or anything that aids my case.
       Thanks!
       VIDEO EVIDENCE:
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com/display/video/a01OZk1IRXgzMWxtZFU2TkNvWGtoNEJtNE5sUVdNWjQyOTJhQ29LWSt5TFFjNGZHQnVRSXBaVmV6Y1h6VW15OFcyMWN1OCt1cFVFUzFrdUZOQkZ2aFE9PQ==
       PHOTO EVIDENCE:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eGYYRSIeo7IxhYMDSHj4rh8S_wxGLVdr/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nvuh8BeThfVqiZKQDr0FyUmoA3XzY7EU/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g2PYx74fEfb6Qqb9_boJzjoqy9GgTsgj/view
       Location:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/3JGXWJfLTH1JnmhN7
       PCN:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1gsbPvJlU-9gb4XJ3FD6V7vQ-s6aP7jX7/view
       PCN:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1n9yWuURntYvnrXWMKMGP2BWzHA4AN7VH/view
       Maps:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PQiUQDd3WGmrzlARi1PEB3L4lr6a_omm/view
       Small camera sign:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/14sKsamRSH3SUpl4tgSeHvhpglDecYKO1/view
       View of bus lane 1:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1oCl__r_Cr2PhidhzJyXbcMMmnEX2be1f/view
       View of bus lane 2:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1qJg3Zrh1oMJsKvmm6iM0tXsk33S-Vf7D/view
       Looking back down the road:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Vi73UuTbciVQuVqDmRKnzcAK1YfFpWgz/view
       #Post#: 9027--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 2, 2023, 10:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It is what is called a "Bus Gate" and years ago it was decided
       at adjudication that PCNs issued for being in a bus lane were
       lawful.
       I don't see much mileage in worn road markings as the signs are
       clear, plus there is an advance warning sign. No times on the
       signs mean they apply 24x7
       Photos are not obligatory, but the photo on your PCN is
       generated from the video recording which is the sole evidence of
       the contravention.  You should be able to view it on their
       website, and then download it and post it here.
       There is room to turn just before the two bus gate signs using
       the street for accessing the rear of Garrard House
       Lack of warnings of a bus gate as you turn into Garrard Street
       is a valid point, but there is a 'cul-de-sac sign as you
       approach on Greyfriars Road in a southbound direction, but
       nothing at all in the northbound direction.
       The signs barring your access are the correct bus gate signs.
       The PCN looks OK, except there is an error in the black text box
       referring to serving a Charge Certificate.  They say "will
       serve", but the regulations only allow them to say "may serve".
       Whether this is a fatal error, I'm not sure.
       There is a lack of advance signage, but that may not win at
       adjudication.  Others on here may see a killer argument, but at
       the moment, I don't.
       If you submit representations rather than paying, do be aware
       that there is no obligation on them to re-offer th e discounted
       amount.  Of course if their reply gets to you before t he 21 day
       discount period expires, you can pay t the discounted amount,
       or, of course, register an appeal at the Traffic Penalty
       Tribunal.
       Were you using satnav ? Sorry if the above wasn't what you
       wanted to hear, but we have to be realistic.
       #Post#: 9036--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: guest17
       Date: November 2, 2023, 12:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OP----your comments on the timing on the PCN don't appear to
       hold up.
       The Council's evidence still shows you in this street at
       16.42.58.92 with a very dark photo at 16.43.02.
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/f3rzsZUCjRrmbMAe7
       To be absolutely sure you must get hold of the video.
       Mike
       #Post#: 9040--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: mg82
       Date: November 2, 2023, 12:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MMV Redux link ---
       >
       > OP----your comments on the timing on the PCN don't appear to
       hold up.
       >
       > The Council's evidence still shows you in this street at
       16.42.58.92 with a very dark photo at 16.43.02.
       >
       >
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/f3rzsZUCjRrmbMAe7
       >
       > To be absolutely sure you must get hold of the video.
       >
       > Mike
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks Mike, here is the video and images. I dont appear to be
       on camera at 16:43.02 That looks like a post-production
       enlargement taken from the earlier video.
       VIDEO EVIDENCE:
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com/display/video/a01OZk1IRXgzMWxtZFU2TkNvWGtoNEJtNE5sUVdNWjQyOTJhQ29LWSt5TFFjNGZHQnVRSXBaVmV6Y1h6VW15OFcyMWN1OCt1cFVFUzFrdUZOQkZ2aFE9PQ==
       PHOTO EVIDENCE:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eGYYRSIeo7IxhYMDSHj4rh8S_wxGLVdr/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nvuh8BeThfVqiZKQDr0FyUmoA3XzY7EU/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g2PYx74fEfb6Qqb9_boJzjoqy9GgTsgj/view
       #Post#: 9041--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: mg82
       Date: November 2, 2023, 12:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > It is what is called a "Bus Gate" and years ago it was decided
       at adjudication that PCNs issued for being in a bus lane were
       lawful.
       >
       > I don't see much mileage in worn road markings as the signs
       are clear, plus there is an advance warning sign. No times on
       the signs mean they apply 24x7
       >
       > Photos are not obligatory, but the photo on your PCN is
       generated from the video recording which is the sole evidence of
       the contravention.  You should be able to view it on their
       website, and then download it and post it here.
       >
       > There is room to turn just before the two bus gate signs using
       the street for accessing the rear of Garrard House
       >
       > Lack of warnings of a bus gate as you turn into Garrard Street
       is a valid point, but there is a 'cul-de-sac sign as you
       approach on Greyfriars Road in a southbound direction, but
       nothing at all in the northbound direction.
       >
       > The signs barring your access are the correct bus gate signs.
       >
       > The PCN looks OK, except there is an error in the black text
       box referring to serving a Charge Certificate.  They say "will
       serve", but the regulations only allow them to say "may serve".
       Whether this is a fatal error, I'm not sure.
       >
       > There is a lack of advance signage, but that may not win at
       adjudication.  Others on here may see a killer argument, but at
       the moment, I don't.
       >
       > If you submit representations rather than paying, do be aware
       that there is no obligation on them to re-offer th e discounted
       amount.  Of course if their reply gets to you before t he 21 day
       discount period expires, you can pay t the discounted amount,
       or, of course, register an appeal at the Traffic Penalty
       Tribunal.
       >
       > Were you using satnav ? Sorry if the above wasn't what you
       wanted to hear, but we have to be realistic.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks - here are the videos and photos.
       VIDEO EVIDENCE:
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com/display/video/a01OZk1IRXgzMWxtZFU2TkNvWGtoNEJtNE5sUVdNWjQyOTJhQ29LWSt5TFFjNGZHQnVRSXBaVmV6Y1h6VW15OFcyMWN1OCt1cFVFUzFrdUZOQkZ2aFE9PQ=
       PHOTO EVIDENCE:
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1eGYYRSIeo7IxhYMDSHj4rh8S_wxGLVdr/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1nvuh8BeThfVqiZKQDr0FyUmoA3XzY7EU/view
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g2PYx74fEfb6Qqb9_boJzjoqy9GgTsgj/view
       #Post#: 9042--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: guest17
       Date: November 2, 2023, 1:14 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Video's not working for me.
       Mike
       #Post#: 9045--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 2, 2023, 1:49 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MMV Redux link ---
       >
       > Video's not working for me.
       >
       > Mike
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Nor me
       #Post#: 9049--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: mg82
       Date: November 2, 2023, 2:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > [quote author=MMV Redux link=topic=840.msg9042#msg9042
       date=1698948899]
       > Video's not working for me.
       >
       > Mike
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Nor me
       [/quote]
       does this work:
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com/display/video/a01OZk1IRXgzMWxtZFU2TkNvWGtoNEJtNE5sUVdNWjQyOTJhQ29LWSt5TGZwN3FtY2hNNGppNGozblRJendXM0V0MmJlN1J3eGRPVW1LZjloYUZJYWc9PQ==
       Otherwise, can you access the video via the council website?
       URL:
  HTML https://reading.zatappeal.com/
       Penalty Charge Notice Number : RG91813766
       Vehicle Registration Mark (VRM) : AF11SRV
       #Post#: 9050--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: mg82
       Date: November 2, 2023, 2:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: MMV Redux link ---
       >
       > Video's not working for me.
       >
       > Mike
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       does this work:
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com
  HTML https://api.zatpark.com/display/video/a01OZk1IRXgzMWxtZFU2TkNvWGtoNEJtNE5sUVdNWjQyOTJhQ29LWSt5TGZwN3FtY2hNNGppNGozblRJendXM0V0MmJlN1J3eGRPVW1LZjloYUZJYWc9PQ==
       Otherwise, can you access the video via the council website?
       URL:
  HTML https://reading.zatappeal.com/
       Penalty Charge Notice Number : RG91813766
       Vehicle Registration Mark (VRM) : AF11SRV
       #Post#: 9065--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Reading Borough Council - 'Being in a bus lane' - Garrard
       Street
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: November 2, 2023, 6:09 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       There is no video on their website, the box for it is blank.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page