URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 101264--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: December 6, 2025, 8:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Correct.
       Just look at any case on the register:
  HTML https://londontribunals.org.uk/ords/pwslive/f?p=14952:70::INITIALISE::70:P70_CAS_REFNO,P70_PCN_REFNO,P70_RETURN_PAGE,P70_AST_CODE:1699047,3107858,60,APPEAL&cs=30ihADQLg9qdMEupImCELcaVqnIFm1Y3JVgvp6Il3PR3eYEb5Go6RWn7_SMIIJYTm3AXLc172qpj0P_O5w8hCXQ
       #Post#: 101304--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: December 6, 2025, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The case I posted earlier today is a full register record
       although I blanked the appellant's name.
       London Tribunals is open to the public and you can actually
       still observe cases I think although most are now done online or
       on the papers.
       #Post#: 102999--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: December 18, 2025, 6:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I plan to put the ETA Appeal in the next few days. The NOR was
       issued on 02 Dec 2025.
       I just wanted to confirm the following steps:
       1) I tick contravention did not occur and procedural impropriety
       2) Do I need to write why I believe the above two points are
       relevant? If so, what should I write in particular?
       3) The hearing should either be telephone or online, NOT on
       paper
       4) Do I need to screenshot the process?
       If there is anything else that I need to do, pl let me know.
       #Post#: 103708--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: December 23, 2025, 4:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've put the ETA appeal in and got a case ref no.
       I've submitted the following:
       Ground(s)for appeal:
       -The contravention did not occur
       -EA Procedural Impropriety
       Reason for appeal: Contravention did not occur and there was a
       Procedural Impropriety.
       Attending hearing: Yes
       I take it the reason for appeal can be edited at a later date
       once the tribunal date is set?
       #Post#: 104630--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: January 5, 2026, 8:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I have a tribunal date in June 2026.
       Would it be advisable to upload the Council's Enforcement
       Protocol
  HTML https://www.camden.gov.uk/documents/d/guest/enforcementprotocol0925view,<br
       />which states that contravention code 30 only applies in
       parking
       bays and not yellow lines (on page 15)?
       The reason I wanted to upload it, just in case an adjudicator
       doesn't understand how that contravention code can't apply on
       yellow lines.
       As recently, I read a tribunal decision and the adjudicator
       noted 'The decisions of this Tribunal do not establish precedent
       and an Adjudicator is not bound by a decision in a previous
       case. I am not persuaded the decision relied upon is one to be
       followed.'
       Therefore, I wanted to cover all the bases in case they do not
       look at or agree with the referenced case I used for the formal
       reps.
       Though there is some time away, do let me know your thoughts.
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 5
   DIR Previous Page