URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 93580--------------------------------------------------
       Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: October 10, 2025, 6:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Dear FTLA,
       I wanted to know what is the correct contravention code that
       should be issued to those who park on a single yellow line with
       a Blue Badge and park for over 3 hours?
       Is it code 01 - Parked in a restricted street during prescribed
       hours
       or
       code 30o - Parking for longer than permitted, blue badge holder
       #Post#: 93584--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SYL BB Holder 3 Hour Limit - Contravention Code Query 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 10, 2025, 7:04 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's code 01, assuming that there aren't any parallel loading
       restrictions.
       Holding and displaying etc. a valid BB provides an exemption to
       the prevailing waiting restriction. When this exemption ceases
       to apply e.g. parked for longer than 3 hours, then the
       prevailing restriction applies.
       #Post#: 93585--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SYL BB Holder 3 Hour Limit - Contravention Code Query 
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: October 10, 2025, 7:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for confirming.
       I've recently received a PCN but they noted the contravention as
       30o instead of 01. There wasn't any 'no loading' blips.
       Put in an informal challenge explaining why the BB Holder was
       parked there and that the wrong contravention code was noted.
       Unfortunately, they rejected the informal challenge. It might be
       worth taking it all the way to ETA.
       Will post up all the details soon.
       #Post#: 93615--------------------------------------------------
       Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: October 10, 2025, 10:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Recently got a PCN for allegedly parking for more than 3 hours
       on a SYL with a Blue Badge (there wasn’t any ‘no loading’
       blips). The BB holder was unwell and took a while to leave but
       when they did the PCN was spotted on the car.
       The CEO noted the contravention code 30o – parking for longer
       than permitted (blue) badge holder.
       Made informal reps outlining why the BB holder took a while to
       leave. Also, explained how the alleged contravention could not
       have taken place on SYL.
       Explained the above to the council in the informal reps and
       hoped they would either apply their discretion understating the
       circumstance of the day or just admit the alleged contravention
       didn’t take place. Unfortunately, they did neither and rejected
       the informal reps.
       I am the vehicle owner/keeper and the V5 is in the correct name
       and address.
       PCN Timeline:
       19/09/25 – PCN on Windscreen
       29/09/25 – Informal Reps/Challenge Submitted Online
       10/10/25 – Informal Reps Decision Letter Received via Email
       PCN Redacted
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1X_dg2AfRuXbWbznc_xyMwFLUfrAjalqW/view?usp=sharing
       Informal Reps Decision Letter Redacted
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vS3qPplugVH6i5_ue8lKAJU1LRJLnCO-/view?usp=drive_link
       Mods, please PM me for unredacted images or the Reg No.
       Is it worth making a formal representation? Will post my draft
       for formal response shortly.
       #Post#: 93616--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 10, 2025, 10:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just 2 mins over...
       I think the wrong contravention can be won but some adjudicators
       don't know the law.
       I think Camden should also be reminded of its duty to act
       fairly.
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/TqgckCxt/Informal-Reps-Decison-Letter.jpg
       #Post#: 93617--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: October 10, 2025, 11:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's in Camden's enforcement protocol that the alleged
       contravention is a bay contravention and doesn't apply to SYL.
       As, outlined in Camden’s Enforcement Protocol Document*:
       ‘Parking Operations Enforcement Protocol, page.15, rev.
       18/10/24.
  HTML https://www.camden.gov.uk/documents/d/guest/enforcementprotocol0925view
       Unfortunately, it was a little over 2 mins. BB Timer Clock
  HTML https://drive.google.com/file/d/10N3ANyk0yijgD1c8dapy7_rlf-gYAIuW/view?usp=sharing
       #Post#: 93622--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 10, 2025, 11:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This case was in Camden. There's often a pattern to certain
       councils misapplying certain parking regulations.
       But I think I saw a case where the adjudicator wasn't as
       knowledgeable as this one.
       Note that Camden attended this one so they should have accepted
       your challenge and now open themselves up to a cost claim if
       they persist.
       ----------------------
       Case reference 2240520470
       Appellant Ian Searle
       Authority London Borough of Camden
       VRM GF15TXT
       PCN Details
       PCN CU6794960A
       Contravention date 02 Aug 2024
       Contravention time 16:56:00
       Contravention location Fordwych Road
       Penalty amount GBP 80.00
       Contravention Parked for longer than permitted
       Referral date -
       Decision Date 18 Feb 2025
       Adjudicator Sean Stanton-Dunne
       Appeal decision Appeal allowed
       Direction cancel the Penalty Charge Notice and the Notice to
       Owner.
       Reasons Mr Searle was scheduled for a hearing by video link
       today but he has not attended and so his appeal is being decided
       on the evidence presented. Ms Sabina Yasmin has attended by
       video link for the Council.
       This PCN was issued for the alleged contravention of “being
       parked for longer than permitted blue (badge holder).”
       The CEO’s images show that Mr Searle’s car was parked on a
       single yellow line displaying a blue badge with the clock set at
       8.30am so that the three-hour blue badge parking exemption had
       ended. The Council’s evidence is that Fordwych Road is part of a
       CPZ with controlled hours of 8.30am to 6.30pm Mondays to
       Fridays.
       There is no contravention of a blue badge holder being parked
       for longer than permitted. The contravention of being parked for
       longer than permitted occurs when a vehicle is parked in a
       parking place where there is a permitted period of parking which
       is exceeded. Mr Searle’s car was not parked in a parking place
       where there was a permitted period of parking. It was parked in
       a restricted street during prescribed hours where there is an
       exemption for blue badge holders to park with the display of a
       clock. When the vehicle became parked beyond the period of the
       exemption, a PCN could have been issued for being parked in a
       restricted street but it was not. The PCN was issued for the
       wrong contravention, indeed a contravention which does not
       exist.
       #Post#: 93625--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: October 10, 2025, 11:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks for that case, helps immensely as it is Camden Council.
       I was planning on submitting the following formal reps:
       I do not agree that the alleged contravention observed by the
       CEO took place.
       I have explained in my informal challenge as to why the Blue
       Badge (BB) Holder has parked there. Unfortunately, this couldn’t
       be taken in to consideration. Though you are welcome to look at
       the informal challenge and reconsider the situation of the day.
       The alleged contravention of ‘Parking for longer than permitted
       blue (badge holder)’ could not have taken place. As, the vehicle
       was parked on a single yellow line with the (substitute) blue
       badge and timer clock correctly displayed.
       The alleged contravention can not take place on single yellow
       lines (SYL) as the BB Holder can not be parked longer than
       permitted on a SYL. The BB Holder is exempted rather than
       permitted, to park on a SYL for 3 hours during restricted
       controlled hours as long as the badge and associated timer clock
       is displayed correctly.
       After the 3 hours are up, the exemption for the BB Holder SYL
       restriction ceases to apply and should be dealt with as having
       no exemption. As, outlined in Camden’s Enforcement Protocol
       Document*: ‘Parking Operations Enforcement Protocol, page.15,
       rev. 18/10/24.
       Upon reading the enforcement protocol, you can see that the
       contravention code 30(o) can only take place in a designated
       parking bay rather than a SYL.
       Clearly, the alleged contravention can only take place in a
       designated parking place rather than a yellow line. Such as, on
       this occasion. Where another contravention may have allegedly
       taken place on the SYL, this should have been noted by the CEO
       however, it wasn’t.
       I await for you to can cancel the PCN.
       *The referenced document is available at:
  HTML https://www.camden.gov.uk/documents/d/guest/enforcementprotocol0925view
       Pl, do let me know what you think and if any changes should be
       made
       #Post#: 93627--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 10, 2025, 11:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You need to wait for the NTO - who is the registered keeper and
       is the logbook address correct.
       When the time comes your reps can be much shorter and to the
       point - you don't need most of what you've done. The
       contravention simply did not occur as it doesn't exist as Mr
       Stanton-Dunne adjudicated.
       Just to show though that some adjudicators don't know bottom
       from elbow, the below case was also for a yellow line (but in
       Redbridge). But don't be put off by this.
       -------------
       Case reference   2250021692
       Appellant   Muhammad Iqbal Khokhar Begum
       Authority   London Borough of Redbridge
       VRM   KK19DYN
       
       PCN Details
       PCN   AF08177945
       Contravention date   30 Oct 2024
       Contravention time   16:49:00
       Contravention location   Grange Road
       Penalty amount   GBP 80.00
       Contravention   Parked for longer than permitted
       
       Referral date   -
       
       Decision Date   05 Apr 2025
       Adjudicator   Natalie Goffe
       Appeal decision   Appeal refused
       Direction   Full penalty charge notice amount stated to be paid
       within 28 days.
       Reasons   This is an appeal by the Appellant against a Penalty
       Charge Notice (PCN) issued by the Enforcement Authority (EA).
       The case was listed as a postal appeal.
       The EA's case is that the vehicle was parked for longer than
       permitted.
       The Appellant refers to medical factors. There is further
       information set out in the representations.
       An Adjudicator decides appeals by making findings of fact on the
       basis of the evidence, and by applying the law.
       Having considered the evidence, I find that the contravention
       occurred. The arrival time on the blue badge was set at 1:30pm,
       and the PCN was issued at 4:46pm. The vehicle was parked for
       longer than the permitted time of 3 hours.
       #Post#: 93629--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Camden Council - Contravention 30o - Single Yellow Line, BB
       Holder
   DIR By: TMOCONTRACTLAW
       Date: October 10, 2025, 11:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am the registered keeper and the logbook address is correct, I
       have double checked this today.
       At the moment, should I do nothing and wait for the 'Notice to
       Owner' to come through the post?
       Is there a certain time frame the NtO should come by, just so
       I'm aware.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 5
   DIR Next Page