DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 93963--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: Yugga
       Date: October 13, 2025, 10:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       all details now posted John.
       --- Quote from: John U.K. link ---
       >
       > Please have a read of
       >
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/
       >
       > and post up here all sides of the PCN (only redact yr name &
       address - leave all else in),
       > any council photos/video
       > and a GSV link to the location (even if not up to date).
       >
       > N.B.
       > As Imgur is no longer available in the UK, you will need to
       use
       > ibb.co
  HTML https://imgbb.com/
       or
  HTML https://imgpile.com/
       >
       > for posting images.
       >
       > Wherever possible, use the BBCode
       >
       > Please also post a copy of your reps -how did you submit them?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 93997--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: October 14, 2025, 6:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It's now over a month since you submitted your representations,
       so if there is nothing showing on the website for your PCN,
       other than PCN served, it might be prudent to call them to find
       out what is going on.
       How did you submit your reps ? If online, did you keep the
       response (e.g a screen capture)?
       #Post#: 94104--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: Yugga
       Date: October 14, 2025, 4:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       online. they sent me full record by email
       #Post#: 94139--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: October 15, 2025, 5:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Let the sleeping dog lie. They clearly have staffing problems as
       many cases are not contested at the Tribunal the last time I
       looked.
       #Post#: 94141--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: SITR
       Date: October 15, 2025, 5:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Let the sleeping dog lie. They clearly have staffing problems
       as many cases are not contested at the Tribunal the last time I
       looked.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I have a feeling there's an element of "strategy" behind this
       rather than RBG just being crap. Not contesting and losing by
       default means a ruling is never given on the merits of the
       appeal (road markings/PCN wording etc etc) and they can go on
       issuing incorrect PCNs (that they know most people will just
       pay) with plausible deniability.
       #Post#: 94165--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 15, 2025, 7:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       2023-2024 Statistics:
  HTML https://www.londontribunals.gov.uk/about/annual-reports-and-appeal-statistics
       They're not the best or worst. Stats don't show anything
       particularly out of step with others.
       #Post#: 94190--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Greenwich council 52m pcn
   DIR By: Yugga
       Date: October 15, 2025, 8:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Is there a time limit for them to respond to a representation?
       Only concern is if ive missed a letter in the post.
       --- Quote from: SITR link ---
       >
       > [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=8288.msg94139#msg94139
       date=1760523124]
       > Let the sleeping dog lie. They clearly have staffing problems
       as many cases are not contested at the Tribunal the last time I
       looked.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I have a feeling there's an element of "strategy" behind this
       rather than RBG just being crap. Not contesting and losing by
       default means a ruling is never given on the merits of the
       appeal (road markings/PCN wording etc etc) and they can go on
       issuing incorrect PCNs (that they know most people will just
       pay) with plausible deniability.
       [/quote]
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page