URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92820--------------------------------------------------
       Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: JOJO1209
       Date: October 4, 2025, 9:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @H C Anderson
       @stamfordman
       @cp8759
       Hi all,
       I've received a PCN and would appreciate your advice before I
       submit my informal appeal within the discount period which is
       Monday.
       Date:22nd Sept, 2024
       Contravention Code:16 (parked in a permit space without
       displaying a valid permit)
       Time:13:39
       The contravention Code 16 states "parked in a permit space
       without displaying a valid permit". However, I hold a valid
       permit which expires 26th December 2025. Linked to permit.
       The core issue is its *clarity not visibility*.
       The PCN was issued on a sunny day in broad daylight, not at dusk
       or when it was dark.
       When I discovered the PCN around 8.45 pm, I first checked the
       permit on the windscreen and the details were readable even
       though it was dark at night.
       Here’s the situation:
       The Permit's Condition:The edges of the permit have a tendency
       to fold up, likely due to weather and the material. The edges
       were folded when the PCN was issued.
       All my Medway permits end up folded up. I don't have this issue
       with my other permits.
       The CEO's Perspective: The CEO's photos (link below) appear to
       be taken from the driver's side or other angles where the folded
       permit's details are obscured.
       The Actual Visibility: Despite the fold, the permit details were
       fully visible from a direct, frontal view or from the passenger
       side where it's displayed. This wasn't a case of a missing
       permit, but one that this CEO chose to read from that angle. The
       blue Medway permit was clearly visible but maybe couldn't be
       read from the specific angles the CEO used.
       My car was parked in its usual space, and if that was the case I
       should have had multiple PCN's. I haven't changed anything
       regarding displaying my permit and I haven't received another
       PCN. I am assuming it was a desperate CEO.
       I plan to appeal on the grounds that a valid permit was
       displayed and was legible from the correct vantage point. I will
       include a clear photo of the valid permit laid flat. Is this a
       valid grounds? What is the technical name for it?
       Are there any other additional grounds for appealing ?
       I'd appreciate your opinions on a few things:
       1.  How should I best frame this "visibility / readability vs.
       angle" argument to the council?
       2.  Is it worth including my own photos demonstrating the
       permit's visibility from the front/passenger side?
       3.  Any other suggestions or similar experiences?
       I'd be grateful for your opinions, suggestions and any other
       points to include in the appeal.
       All thoughts are welcome. Thanks in advance for your help.
       Link to PCN & Current Permit
  HTML https://ibb.co/album/zX2Lm0
  HTML https://ibb.co/Z1JjWyB7
  HTML https://ibb.co/tMTMzP05
  HTML https://ibb.co/p6rHwLYy
  HTML https://ibb.co/xqt2rmdf
  HTML https://ibb.co/f73zbNH
  HTML https://ibb.co/GmfD2mS
  HTML https://ibb.co/YqyzJdy
  HTML https://ibb.co/67c2h0c8
  HTML https://ibb.co/JWcC69k8
  HTML https://ibb.co/pvf5vc0d
       #Post#: 92843--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 4, 2025, 1:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So this time you do have a code 16.
       And this is the CEO's pic...
       Can't you get a holder that keeps the permit flat?
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/4Rn9fzQN/med.jpg
       #Post#: 92856--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: October 4, 2025, 6:13 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry to have to say it, but if this is your idea of
       "visibility", I can see why the CEO served a PCN.
       #Post#: 92951--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: JOJO1209
       Date: October 6, 2025, 2:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
       >
       >
       >
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/4Rn9fzQN/med.jpg
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       So this time you do have a code 16.
       And this is the CEO's pic...
       Can't you get a holder that keeps the permit flat?
       [member=2249]stamfordman[/member]
       Thanks for your response
       What is the correct code CC 16  or CC 19?
       It is code 19 that I have seen issued on my road which is
       usually £50.
       A simple 'yes' or 'no' and a brief explanation of the difference
       in relation toy case between Code 16 and Code 19 would
       beincredibly helpful for me to understand how to proceed with
       challenging this and any future PCN's.
       The Flawed CEO's photographic Evidence:
       It is Inadequate and Misleading.  I have serious concerns about
       the photographic evidence provided on the Medway website.
       Timing and Visibility: My own photograph, taken at 20:45,
       clearly shows the permit details. In contrast, the CEO's photo
       was taken at 13:39 in full daylight, yet the details are
       obscured
       The CEO's daytime photo is angled to obscure the details, while
       my evening photo proves the permit was visible and valid. This
       feels like a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the situation.
       The CEO deliberately took the photograph from an angle that
       makes the permit details unreadable, rather than capturing a
       clear, front-on shot. This does not constitute reasonable or
       fair evidence.
       Furthermore, no one else has access to my car, the permit could
       not have been adjusted between the CEO's photograph and my own.
       Please review the picture I took in the night around 20:45 hrs.
       Let me know what you think.
       2. The Permit Holder:
       The holders (even expensive ones) warp, and the permit itself
       curls due to weather, despite my best efforts to keep it flat. I
       have bought several permit holders even expensive ones. Also the
       paper permit itself starts curling after a couple of months.
       When it is new it is fine. I have the previous years and it is
       the same.
       Any suggestions how to stop or avoid this curling or the permit
       and the permit holder will be appreciated. It can be very
       stressful. My other permit ehich is a round one does not curl.
       Any advice on how to best frame my appeal would be hugely
       appreciated
       I want to send it today to be within the discount period just
       incase it turns out that I have to pay it.
       Many thanks.
       #Post#: 92953--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: JOJO1209
       Date: October 6, 2025, 2:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > Sorry to have to say it, but if this is your idea of
       "visibility", I can see why the CEO served a PCN.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       [member=12]Incandescent[/member]
       I appreciate you taking the time to look, but I would encourage
       you to review the full context in my original post and my linked
       pictures before drawing a conclusion. My explanation and the
       photo evidence (including the time-stamped images from the CEO
       and myself) address the specific issues of the permit's
       condition and the angle of the official photograph. I'm here for
       constructive advice on challenging the PCN based on that
       evidence
       Please review the full context if you'd like to contribute
       constructively."
       #Post#: 92996--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 6, 2025, 5:16 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The CEO's pic shows a mess of curled up permits.
       All you have is an ask for discretion showing you have a valid
       permit and note their permits do curl but really you need to
       take responsibility.
       Tape the holder shut so the permit can't curl or get one that
       seals flat.
       #Post#: 93003--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 6, 2025, 5:40 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       +1 to your irresponsibility!
       You posted: The core issue is its *clarity not visibility*.
       This is your take, we don't know the CEO's position and won't
       know until their notes are reviewed by the authority on receipt
       of your reps.
       I suggest:
       I hold a valid permit, see enclosed.
       This has a tendency to curl at the edges at times. I try to
       counter this with a holder, but if this was the reason for the
       PCN then I apologise.
       As a res permit holder I park in this area regularly and this is
       the first time that an issue has arisen*. I hope you would use
       your discretion to cancel on this occasion, but in any event a
       detailed reason for my apparent failure would be appreciated.
       *- if true!
       #Post#: 93007--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: October 6, 2025, 5:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > *- if true!
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Same OP:
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/code-19-medway-council-meadowbank-resident-parking-permit-partially-displayed/
       #Post#: 93035--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: JoCo
       Date: October 6, 2025, 7:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The CEO's photo clearly shows that the permit is curled over to
       the extent that the top edges are overlapping.
       The OP's photos,  show a permit which is much less curled.  The
       top edges are not even touching.
  HTML https://ibb.co/fGXM1gjZ
  HTML https://ibb.co/fGXM1gjZ
       [img]
  HTML https://ibb.co/99vzbYvP[/img]
       This is not just a difference of angle / perspective / parallax.
       I am curious how the permit moved from, presumably, fully
       visible display on parking, to curled over when the PCN was
       issued, to unfurled when OP returned to car.  Could the OP
       explain this to a sceptical adjudicator, if it came to it?
       As HCA I would be inclined to ask for discretion. An apology
       with a note that you had a valid permit and unfortunately it was
       partially obscured,  copy attached. You have now remedied the
       situation with a better quality pass holder, and you are sure it
       won't happen again.
       My council, Greenwich, have a policy of forgiving a first
       offence for partially obscured permit.  Yours may too. I have
       previously benefited from an appeal on that basis*.
       *In my case the council didn't cancel PCN. I appealed.
       Adjudicator found in my favour that council didn't follow
       policy.
       #Post#: 93127--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Medway CC16 Meadowbank Resident Parking Permit displayed 
   DIR By: JOJO1209
       Date: October 6, 2025, 2:32 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=2249]stamfordman[/member]
       [member=428]H C Andersen[/member]
       Thanks for all the input.
       I'm posting a follow-up to my previous message to provide some
       additional evidence that really highlights the extent of this
       curling problem.
       I've laid all my permits side-by-side for a direct comparison.
       The attached picture shows all my Medway permits for the last 3
       years - 2023, 2024, and 2025. As you can see, they are all
       severely curled, forming an arch. This isn't a minor issue; it
       makes them impossible to lie flat.
       The other pictures are of my other permits for the last 4 years,
       which are made of pure paper. They remain perfectly flat and
       fully readable.
       The photo of the back of the Medway permit clearly shows how the
       lamination has tightened and distorted, much worse than the
       front.
       This side-by-side comparison proves the point conclusively. The
       problem is not how I store them or the holder in which they are
       displayed—it is 100% the laminated plastic backing on the
       resident permits.
       The lamination on the back is the root cause, which is why the
       back consistently curls much more severely than the front. This
       creates a tight roll that makes the permit impossible to display
       flat. The curl is consistently worse on the laminated back,
       proving the material itself is the cause.
       When we used to have paper tax discs that were displayed on
       windscreens for years, they had no curling issues because they
       were fully paper.
       The sun and the car temperature cause the laminate to shrink and
       curl irreversibly after a few months.
       This is a consistent, predictable flaw affecting every single
       one of these permits issued across multiple years. The council
       needs to address this poor material choice, as it is directly
       leading to unfair PCNs for residents.
       My Resident Permit had curled to the point of being partially
       unreadable or hard to read from a distance.
       Is this a predictable material flaw, and is the council at fault
       for using a material unfit for its intended environment (a car
       windscreen)?
       By using this inferior laminated material, the council has
       created a situation where a legally displayed permit becomes
       non-compliant through no fault of the resident.
       This feels like a design flaw that is unfairly penalizing
       residents.
       A valid permit should not become non-compliant due to a material
       choice made by the council. The fault lies with the permit's
       inability to withstand its intended environment, not with my
       conduct as a permit holder.
       I need your opinion or input on this specific point:
       Any opinion or shared experience you can provide that supports
       this "design flaw" argument will be invaluable for my appeal.
       Thank you for your help.
  HTML https://ibb.co/9khJjhBq
  HTML https://ibb.co/3yY738YZ
  HTML https://ibb.co/wNC6kstG
  HTML https://ibb.co/G4mHHDjc
  HTML https://ibb.co/YqyzJdy
       (Picture taken Jan 25 when permit was
       less than a month one month old. Permit was nice and flat)
  HTML https://ibb.co/C3XW35dQ
  HTML https://ibb.co/9mq5KJbn
       
  HTML https://ibb.co/v4NZBpKk
       
  HTML https://ibb.co/RkWH9Rx5
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page