URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Speeding and other criminal offences
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92448--------------------------------------------------
       SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: Kudus Date: October 1, 2025, 6:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi I would appreciate any help. I received a NIP on 22/4/25 for
       a speeding offence on 17/04/25 for doing 59 in 30mph zone. I am
       the RK of the vehicle but I was not driving at the time. I sent
       off the details for the individual driving who lives abroad. The
       police asked for further details on the individual's licence and
       insurance. The individual showed me his license and motor policy
       and I shared the information I had to the police to the best of
       my knowledge. The police responded by saying it is easy to
       nominate a driver abroad and require copies of his documents. I
       responded by saying I saw his documents and didn't think (or
       know how) to validate his license. In hindsight I regret making
       this error and did not think this would happen. On the 24/09/25
       I received a SJP notice for 2 offences. Permit the driving of a
       motor vehicle otherwise than in accordance with a license - non
       endorsable offence. Permit use of motor vehicle with no
       insurance. I intend to plead not guilty to both offences as I
       feel hard done by this situation. However I am worried as I have
       no hard evidence and the police have referred to Section 101 or
       the magistrates court act 1980 stating the burden shall be on
       the defendant. What advise do you have?
       #Post#: 92455--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: DWMB2 Date: October 1, 2025, 6:30 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The first thing that comes to mind is to contact the driver and
       ask him to provide you with evidence of his licence and the
       insurance he had at the time that covered him to drive your
       vehicle in this country.
       #Post#: 92458--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: Kudus Date: October 1, 2025, 6:40 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I contacted him when I received the original NIP and again when
       the police requested further documenation. Infuriatingly he has
       not responded and I can't get a hold of him. I've tried going
       through mutuals but no luck. I'm so annoyed at myself I haven't
       really experienced this before when lending/borrowing cars.
       #Post#: 92465--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: Southpaw82 Date: October 2, 2025, 1:08 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It was rather naive of you to lend your car to someone you don’t
       seem to know that well. Unless you can prove that the driver was
       properly licensed and insured you’re going to have problems.
       #Post#: 92475--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: JustLoveCars Date: October 2, 2025, 3:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Kudus link=topic=8251.msg92448#msg92448
       date=1759360239]
       I intend to plead not guilty to both offences as I feel hard
       done by this situation. However I am worried as I have no hard
       evidence and the police have referred to Section 101 or the
       magistrates court act 1980 stating the burden shall be on the
       defendant. What advise do you have?
       [/quote]
       You should only really plead not guilty if you have a defence.
       Feeling 'hard done by' is not a defence.
       As you note, most offences require the prosecution to prove your
       guilt but some, particularly insurance, the burden is reversed.
       (The defendant has to prove the necessary cover was in place)
       Without a defence, going to a contested trial will result in an
       additional costs bill on top of the sentence (also losing guilty
       plea discounts).
       #Post#: 92490--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: Kudus Date: October 2, 2025, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've never had issues before but I agree it was naive of me to
       think this would never happen. Since I don't have any hard
       evidence and I can't get hold of him. Is the best course of
       action to plead guilty since I would struggle to convince the
       court as it's a case of my word against theirs situation. What
       charges can I expect from the 2 offences?
       #Post#: 92492--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: andy_foster Date: October 2, 2025, 5:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Struggling to see how s. 101 MCA applies - the driver being
       insured is not an exemption to the offence - it removes the
       entire legal basis of the allegation.
       Case law provides that driving without insurance is a reverse
       burden offence - it is very difficult for the prosecution to
       prove a negative, and should be trivial for the driver to prove
       that he was insured, so for that offence to be workable, there
       must be a reverse burden of proof.
       However, you have been charged with permitting. I am not aware
       of any case law specifically on the burden of proof for
       permitting. Whilst it is entirely sensible to impose a reverse
       burden of proof on the driver to prove that he was insured, it
       does not necessarily follow that the same should hold true for
       the person charged with permitting.
       Where this starts to make my head hurt is that nobody involved
       in the process believes that the person you are accused of
       permitting to drive without a licence or insurance was actually
       driving. This is what is known as a prosecution under s. 69 of
       the Ways and Means Act. They think that you have failed to name
       the driver. They think that you have perverted the course of
       justice and/or committed perjury, but proving it beyond any
       reasonable doubt would be somewhere between too difficult and
       impossible.
       If convicted, you can expect 6 points and a hefty fine for the
       permitting no insurance offence,
       #Post#: 92493--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: 666 Date: October 2, 2025, 5:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Kudus link=topic=8251.msg92490#msg92490
       date=1759398767]
       I've never had issues before but I agree it was naive of me to
       think this would never happen. Since I don't have any hard
       evidence and I can't get hold of him. Is the best course of
       action to plead guilty since I would struggle to convince the
       court as it's a case of my word against theirs situation. What
       charges can I expect from the 2 offences?
       [/quote]
       The charges will be those listed on the SJPN. As advised above,
       unless you have solid evidence, pleading not guilty will only
       result in much higher costs.
       For future reference, most overseas insurance policies do not
       provide cover in the UK. As well as any criminal consequences,
       there is a real risk of uncovered damage to your own car, and of
       third-party costs. If, for example, there is a personal injury
       claim, your insurer would pay the claim but would recover the
       costs from you.
       #Post#: 92522--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: Kudus Date: October 2, 2025, 7:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for all the advise I will seek some legal advice on
       how to proceed but leaning towards pleading guilty as I have no
       photographic evidence/copy of the insurance policy he had. The
       SJP notes include the police stating that they are unable to
       confirm or negate the existence of the driver. I just assumed
       the police abroad would be able to handle the chasing of their
       end since I have given his adress.
       #Post#: 92531--------------------------------------------------
       Re: SJP Notice - 2 offences 
       By: JustLoveCars Date: October 2, 2025, 8:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=Kudus link=topic=8251.msg92522#msg92522
       date=1759409036]
       I just assumed the police abroad would be able to handle the
       chasing of their end since I have given his address.
       [/quote]
       No - the local Police won't be chasing anything for such a
       'minor' matter.  What country is it for reference?
       When my brother-in-law (Lives in Singapore) was caught speeding
       in the UK, just providing proof of licence and insurance simply
       saw the Police drop the matter as they cannot realistically
       pursue an overseas driver.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page