URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 104585--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 5, 2026, 12:18 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any more views and help from experienced members?
       #Post#: 104761--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 6, 2026, 8:22 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       @H C Andersen any further insights help appreciated please
       #Post#: 104762--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 6, 2026, 8:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=428]H C Andersen[/member]
       #Post#: 104857--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: January 6, 2026, 4:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Mr Andersen seems to be taking a break. I'll try and look at
       this later.
       #Post#: 104966--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 7, 2026, 10:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, really appreciate this.
       #Post#: 105223--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 9, 2026, 9:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all - I have one week left to reply, any further help
       appreciated on the actual wording of reps.
       [member=2249]stamfordman[/member]
       #Post#: 106187--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 16, 2026, 8:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I need to submit today so I will submit these as formal reps
       unless there are any commmets please:
       The contravention did not occur due to:
       1) There's no evidence of any actual suspension signs, just an
       advanced warning notice. The order says it's only valid at "such
       times then appropriate traffic signs are displayed in accordance
       with TSRGD 2016(c)", and that "Parking restrictions will apply
       when the appropriate signs are displayed". The council is put to
       strict proof that such signs were in display rather than mere
       advance warning signs.
       The PCN gives a contravention of "01a Parked in a restricted
       street during prescribed hours (temporary traffic order)" which
       I dispute happened. In support, I refer to the authority's
       letter rejecting my informal representations, in particular the
       following:
       Quoting verbatim from that letter 'When a parking place is
       suspended, the suspension remains in force whilst the suspension
       sign is in place. You must not use a suspended parking space to
       park, wait, load or unload while the suspension is in force,
       even if it appears there is no work being carried out."
       This clearly shows that the authority consider that the parking
       place was simply suspended, indeed this word and its derivatives
       occurs no less than 8 times in just these two short paragraphs.
       And yet despite this, the PCN refers to the breach of a
       'waiting' restriction.
       The issue here is therefore whether the imposition of a waiting
       restriction within these parking places was made lawfully,
       properly implemented as regards notice and conveyed adequately
       to motorists by traffic signs. For the reasons set out in both
       my informal and formal representations which should be read
       alongside these and for the reasons set out above I contend that
       the alleged contravention did not occur.
       From the picture taken by the CEO, the sign states 8am-6pm; the
       order states that the amended restriction applies only if the
       appropriate prescribed traffic signs are placed, the order
       states that the restriction is "at any time" (there is no
       reference to 8am-6pm), therefore "appropriate traffic signs"
       have not been placed, therefore the order has not been
       implemented correctly and no penalties may be demanded because
       the specific contravention has not occurred.
       2) The suspension sign says the restriction lasts "until Monday
       29th September 8am-4pm". As the observation time was after
       8:07-8:19am, the signposted restriction had already ended.
       3) The suspension sign contains incomprehensible text which
       doesn't mean anything.
       4) PCN is for the wrong contravention. Code 02 should have been
       used instead of Code 01a as loading is also banned
       5) Failure to consider of informal reps (as the claim that the
       right signs were in place is false)
       6) The council is put to strict proof that "Tree works - Green
       Space, Cleansing and Gristwood and Toms" occurred after 08:07 on
       that day as otherwise the Traffic order imposes no restrictions.
       7. The council has no produced any photos which are actually
       relevant to where my car was parked. The photos in display are
       of a sign which is posted after a disabled bay with different
       parking terms in the middle. The council needs to produce photos
       of the sign nearest to where the car was parked not of a
       different parking area separated by a disabled parking bay and
       multiple double white lines.
       #Post#: 106478--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: January 19, 2026, 4:43 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       i sent this for now as running out of time
       #Post#: 109209--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: taffer87
       Date: February 9, 2026, 7:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=1]cp8759[/member] just checking if you can have a look
       too plz the council has rejected the formal representations.
       #Post#: 109210--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Newham 01a - tempoary parking suspension - Tarling Road
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: February 9, 2026, 7:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [member=832]taffer87[/member] I do not have capacity to provide
       advice on the forum, apologies. If you'd like me to look at this
       for you please read the One-on-one support paragraph at the
       bottom of this page
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/.
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 6
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page