URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92025--------------------------------------------------
       Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: Skinnyfinger
       Date: September 29, 2025, 10:27 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       The driver parked at Galleria Car park, Hatfield on 16th March,
       which is operated by Horizon Parking. The car park uses ANPR and
       pay before return to car. The driver had been there many times
       and normally when typing in the first few letters of the
       registration, the payment system would match it to a car that
       entered the car park that day, automatically complete it, and
       generate the correct amount to pay. The driver paid for the
       session and left.
       On 4th April, they received a PCN claiming they did not pay for
       the session, and appealed to the operator with the credit card
       statement as evidence. The company replied that they couldn't
       find a payment against the car registration and lowered the fine
       to £15. The driver appealed again; the company then wrote back:
       "After further investigation, I can confirm that payment for
       parking was made under vehicle registration XX22 however, your
       vehicle registration is XX22 XXX.
       As payment for parking was not made under the correct
       registration, we were unable to
       reconcile the payment that you made with the vehicle you were
       using, and a Parking Charge
       was therefore issued.
       The signs throughout the car park are clear and comply fully
       with the BPA’s prescribed rules
       and regulations. When parking on private land, it is the
       driver’s responsibility to ensure they
       adhere to the terms and conditions of the car park concerned.
       Given the above, and whilst we have considered your
       representations carefully, on this
       occasion your appeal has been rejected."
       The driver was baffled because it was impossible to pay for the
       session without the system identifying the vehicle and
       generating an amount to pay. They appealed to POPLA, intending
       to attach a video they made on a recent visit, showing how the
       payment system worked (and how it would not generate an amount
       to pay if the registration was not recognised) as evidence.
       However, POPLA website did not accept video upload, so the
       driver included a link to Google Photos to access the video.
       Horizon reviewed the video and claimed that the video was not
       relevant because it was not made during the original visit (but
       they were missing the point - the point was it was not possible
       to pay!). POPLA worker rejected the appeal because they cannot
       access evidence that was not uploaded, and said if the driver
       had intended to use the video they should have contacted POPLA
       directly, rather than attaching a link to view it.
       The driver received a Parking Charge Final Reminder issued on
       14th Sept demanding £95 outstanding charge. If full payment is
       not received within 14 days (which has passed) this case may be
       passed to a debt recovery agent which may result in court
       proceedings to recover the outstanding amount and additional
       fees may be incurred.
       The driver still believes it was system error, but Horizon
       insisted that there was no error. What is the best option now?
       Any advice is appreciated.
       #Post#: 92026--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: Dave65
       Date: September 29, 2025, 10:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Can you post a copy of the PPN?
       with personal details redacted but leave dates.
       Has the driver been identified in any appeal?
       #Post#: 92031--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: Skinnyfinger
       Date: September 29, 2025, 10:46 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, the driver is me and I have identified myself. Please see
       below for the PCN final reminder
       [img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/HgMCNgr[/img]
  HTML https://imgur.com/HgMCNgr
  HTML https://imgur.com/HgMCNgr
       #Post#: 92043--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: b789
       Date: September 29, 2025, 11:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       A reminder is as useful as a poke in the arm with a sharp stick.
       We need to see the original Notice to Keeper (NtK) will ALL
       dates and times visible.
       It's a pity you did not come here for advice before appealing to
       both Horizon and POPLA. However, you are where you are.
       You can safely ignore all debt recovery letters. Debt collectors
       are powerless to do anything except to try and intimidate the
       low-hanging fruit on the gullible tree to pay up out of
       ignorance and fear.
       Come back when you receive a Letter of Claim (LoC) and we will
       advise on how to beat this and not have to pay a penny to
       Horizon.
       #Post#: 92096--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: Skinnyfinger
       Date: September 29, 2025, 3:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       TBH I thought it was ridiculous and didn't take it seriously,
       and definitely should have come here for advice when I received
       the initial notice (but I only just found this forum). I'll come
       back if/when I receive a LoC. Thank you all for what you do
       here.
       #Post#: 124579--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: Skinnyfinger
       Date: July 14, 2026, 3:49 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       An update on the PCN. I have received a Letter Before Claim for
       the Horizon PCN from Gladstone Solicitors. I paste the content
       below. I would really appreciate any advice on dealing with this
       please.
       I still believe there was a system error as there shouldn’t have
       been a parking fee if I had entered the wrong number plate given
       it was ANPR. I had tried numerous times after the PCN, entering
       a wrong number plate it never returned an amount to pay. Very
       puzzling.
       Thank you!
       Content of letter:
       We act on behalf of Horizon Parking Limited and are instructed
       to commence legal proceedings against you to recover unpaid
       parking charge notice(s) as detailed above (full details of them
       having been sent to you by our client already). If in the next
       30 days the amount due is not paid in full, or a valid legal
       reason for non-payment is not provided, we will commence court
       proceedings against you without further notice.
       The amount due includes £70.00 claimed by our client for the
       time/resources spent facilitating the recovery of the unpaid
       parking charge notice(s) pursuant to its ATA's Code of Practice
       and the Terms and Conditions of the Contract, which was entered
       into upon the driver of the vehicle entering the Relevant Land.
       The amount is a pre-determined and nominal contribution to our
       client's losses as a direct result of your non-payment.
       We refer you to the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims
       (paragraph 7) (the 'PAP') and the Practice Direction for
       Pre-Action Conduct (paragraphs 13-16) contained in the Civil
       Procedure Rules ('CPR'); regarding the Court's powers to impose
       sanctions for any failure to comply with the Practice Direction
       or the Protocol.
       If you dispute the amount due you should respond via the reply
       form. In accordance with the PAP, which obliges the parties to
       act reasonably and proportionately. This can be completed on our
       website www.gladstonessolicitors.co.uk or alternatively, you can
       request a paper version (see overleaf). Before completing the
       online reply form you will be required to create a login, you
       will need your reference to do this.
       Warning regarding the issue of Court Proceedings
       If you fail to pay the amount due or provide reasons as to why
       you dispute the debt within 30 days, our client reserves all its
       rights, including the right to commence Court proceedings which
       will incur further costs and interest (as detailed below), which
       will be added to the value of the claim. Following which, a
       County Court Judgment ('CCJ') may be entered against you.
       If a CCJ is obtained in default, this will show on your credit
       record immediately and if payment of the CCJ is not made within
       1 calendar month of the date of entry of the Judgment, the CCJ
       will not be removed and will be applied to your credit record
       for a period of 6 years.
       This may affect your ability to obtain credit in the future, or
       result in higher rates of interest being applied to any credit
       you are able to obtain.
       Please Contact Us
       Our team is ready to try to work with you to resolve this matter
       without the need for Court proceedings so it is important you
       contact us upon receipt of this letter.
       #Post#: 124581--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: July 14, 2026, 4:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you’re going to defend this claim, then you need to reply to
       the letter from Gladstones with reference to
  HTML https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/pd_pre-action_conduct,<br
       />
       --- Quote ---
       > the defendant responding within a reasonable time – 14 days in
       a straight forward case and no more than 3 months in a very
       complex one. The reply should include confirmation as to whether
       the claim is accepted and, if it is not accepted, the reasons
       why, together with an explanation as to which facts and parts of
       the claim are disputed
       --- End Quote ---
       , or you search the forum for other replies to similar letters.
       You do not have to use their “form” or their portal for this,
       it’s just a letter in response to a letter.
       You then need to think of your defence for the likely county
       court claim that will follow. We can advise on the mechanics of
       this, but you need to examine the Particulars of Claim that will
       be on the N1SDT form and reply to them, with a defence which is
       specific to their allegations and your reasons why you deny the
       claim.
       Do not use the long boilerplate/template defence which goes on
       about the process, because increasingly this is being struck out
       by the courts as not being specific enough to the claim.
       If you want more information, I suggest you search the forum for
       similar cases.
       #Post#: 124590--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: Skinnyfinger
       Date: July 14, 2026, 5:35 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you. I can't quite find a similar case where the reason
       for disputing the PCN is that a car park with ANPR should not
       have generated a payment amount if a wrong vehicle registration
       was entered, which is making me a bit pessimistic. In any case
       I'm planning to respond to the Letter Before Claim with the
       following:
       On 16 March 2025, my vehicle entered the car park at The
       Galleria Hatfield. I paid £3 by card. Evidence of the payment is
       enclosed. Your client has confirmed that it located and mapped
       this payment to my vehicle. This is therefore not a case in
       which the parking tariff was unpaid or deliberately avoided.
       Your client’s position is that only “XX22” was recorded rather
       than my complete registration. However, “XX22” was entered as a
       search term, not as the registration against which I intended to
       purchase parking. I had parked at this car park on numerous
       previous occasions and had consistently followed the same
       process. I entered “XX22”, after which the ANPR-linked terminal
       identified and displayed my vehicle. I selected the vehicle
       shown and the system calculated the amount payable by reference
       to its recorded entry time. Because this process had worked
       successfully on previous visits, I reasonably understood that
       entering “XX22” searched the live ANPR records and allowed me to
       select my full registration. I did not knowingly purchase
       parking against an incomplete registration.
       On the date concerned, the terminal generated a tariff and
       accepted my payment without warning me that the vehicle had not
       been correctly identified or that the transaction was invalid.
       There is therefore a genuine factual dispute as to whether the
       terminal:
       - identified my vehicle but failed to retain or link the full
       registration correctly;
       - accepted payment without retaining the vehicle selected on
       screen; or
       - accepted a partial search without adequately warning that the
       parking session had not been linked to a complete registration.
       The fact that your client has found and mapped the payment
       supports my position that the payment related to this vehicle
       and parking event.
       #Post#: 124626--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Horizon Parking PCN - Failure to Pay - Galleria, Hatfield 
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: July 14, 2026, 8:01 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, just bear in mind that the operator will ignore anything
       you say in your response, you’re simply responding to document
       your disagreement to the courts in due course if necessary. A
       court claim will follow, which you will defend, and it’s
       unlikely that it will ever actually get to court, but it’s
       suggested that you always assume that it might and act
       acordingly.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1