DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 91885--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: fraser.mitchell
Date: September 28, 2025, 5:41 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Bailiffs can seize goods on the public highway. See here
Schedule 12 Section 9 of the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement
Act 2007
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/schedule/12
also note Section 10.
#Post#: 91887--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: Enceladus
Date: September 28, 2025, 6:03 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes. My thoughts are that I still don't know who is the
Registered Keeper as held by the DVLA on the day of the alleged
contravention.
Is it a finance or lease company at their address?
Is it your company at the companies address?
Is it your company at your accountants address?
Or is it you personally at your own address?
Or who and where?
You were badly advised by DART. A Witness Statement on it's own
will not suffice, the matter has progressed beyond that. You
would also need to support the WS with an Out of Time
application. DART can and likely will oppose any such
application.
However you can only submit a WS & OOT if you are the person
named on the Order for Recovery or the Notice of Enforcement.
Do you know whether the alleged contravention occurred before or
after you setup the auto-pay?
Actually an enquiry on the DART website using your VRM returns
"There are currently no PCNs outstanding on this vehicle".
#Post#: 91902--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: September 29, 2025, 2:37 am
---------------------------------------------------------
If the bailiffs attend the address of the legal entity named on
the NoE , there wont be the required goods to seize as the car
is not on the address of the NoE. It is with the registered
keepers address.
Any thoughts ?
Yes. Your understanding is misplaced.
Goods is not the car, it is any goods which the bailiff
reasonably believes belong to the debtor(the person named on the
NoE*), even computers, monitors, printers etc.. The car often
represents easy pickings because they use ANPR to track down
vehicles.
Why, why, why do you keep referring to 'the registered keeper's
address' when clearly this person isn't? Only you know the
answer.
Anyway, the longer the debtor procrastinates and the longer you
prevaricate (hope I've applied these correctly) the greater the
debt becomes.
*- I refer to NoE because this is all that concerns the bailiff.
Two separate but linked procedures are in place here: road
traffic contravention legislation and this -
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/15/schedule/12
#Post#: 91978--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: Bailiff Advice
Date: September 29, 2025, 7:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Enceladus link ---
>
>
> Actually an enquiry on the DART website using your VRM returns
"There are currently no PCNs outstanding on this vehicle".
--- End Quote ---
Just so that you are aware, once a Dart Charge penalty has been
passed an enforcement company, the Dart Charge website always
states the wording that 'There are currently no PCNs outstanding
on this vehicle'. I cannot tell you how confusing this is.
I can only assume that this message has been placed so as to
ensure that motorists do not try to make payment direct to Dart
Charge instead of the enforcement company.
Bailiff Advice Online
HTML https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk/
#Post#: 91985--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: azuremumbai80
Date: September 29, 2025, 7:44 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thanks .I agree .
On further reading , I can also see some suggestion on filing a
TE9 and TE7 form and send to a tec@juctice.co.uk as the previous
PCN was not provided .
You need to complete:
•
•
of time (since you never got the earlier letters)
#Post#: 91994--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: Bailiff Advice
Date: September 29, 2025, 8:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
You made this comment:
The Notice of Enforcement was addressed to the Company Secretary
as it is a company Lease vehicle and I am the registered keeper.
The address was send to the Accountant address for the company
communication. Though the address was requested for update
earlier year to the vehicle finance company.
Can you please explain what you mean by this.
Who actually has POSSESSION of the V5C (Log Book)....you or the
finance company.
Have you asked Highways for the name and address where their
notices had initially been sent to?
You mention having a Dart Charge since April. Have you asked
Highways for the date of the crossing and, if applicable; why
payment was not deduced from your Dart Charge account?
Call Highways....their number is: 0300 300 0120.
PS: Only once you have the information can you complete the
forms TE7 and TE9.
Bailiff Advice Online
HTML https://bailiffadviceonline.co.uk/index-page/dart-charge-and-tfl-congestion-charge/dart-charge-out-of-time-witness-statement
#Post#: 92058--------------------------------------------------
Re: DART Charge notice NH - Bristow&Sutor - Notice of
enforcement
DIR By: H C Andersen
Date: September 29, 2025, 12:54 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Surely the OP cannot submit anything to anyone: they're not the
addressee on the NoE - although they continue to dodge this
matter.
OP, you have been asked to post simple docs and provide similar
info. What's the problem?
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 2
DIR Previous Page