DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 97564--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: Billy Butcher Date: November 10, 2025, 9:04 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi Mate, I only provided the one example that B789 provided. I
am such an amateur at this. I got 7 days to reply to what their
argument is, I was thinking if I should mention that it was
indeed paid and I have proof of that on my bank statement or
just not bother mention that at all. Not sure where to go from
here with these crooks!
#Post#: 97838--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: Billy Butcher Date: November 12, 2025, 6:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi lads, can you recommend anything that I could say back to
ParkMavens reply to POPLA?
#Post#: 97854--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: b789 Date: November 12, 2025, 6:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Just copy and paste the following as your response:
[quote]POPLA should determine liability on law, not on
Parkmaven’s generic narrative about signs, ANPR or non-payment.
Keeper liability only arises if the NTK strictly complies with
every “must” in PoFA Schedule 4 paragraph 9(2). It does not.
1. PoFA 9(2)(e)(i) missing. Parkmaven repeatedly asserts “full
compliance with PoFA” but nowhere in their evidence do they
identify a sentence that invites the keeper to pay the unpaid
parking charges. Their NTK talks to “the driver” when demanding
payment and does not contain an invitation directed to “the
keeper” to pay. PoFA 9(2)(e) has two limbs; limb (i) is an
invitation to the keeper to pay. Without that exact invitation,
keeper liability cannot arise. POPLA should require Parkmaven to
point, verbatim, to the precise sentence within the NTK that
invites the keeper to pay. If they cannot, the appeal must be
allowed.
2. No concept of substantial compliance. Parkmaven’s claims
about signage, payment systems, and ANPR are irrelevant to the
statutory gateway. The gateway never opens unless each element
in 9(2) is present. A missing limb is fatal to keeper liability
even if other matters are proven.
3. Driver only. Parkmaven’s case is predicated on a driver
breach. The driver has not been identified. In the absence of a
PoFA-compliant NTK containing the mandatory keeper-payment
invitation, only the driver could be liable and the keeper
cannot be.
4. Period of parking. POPLA should also scrutinise 9(2)(a). If
the NTK merely states ANPR entry/exit times or a “duration of
stay” rather than specifying a period of parking, it fails
9(2)(a). ANPR timestamps record vehicle movement, not a period
parked. If the NTK lacks an actual stated period of parking,
that is a separate PoFA failure and again prevents keeper
liability.
5. Irrelevance of BPA Code assertions. Whether Parkmaven say
they complied with a trade association code does not cure a PoFA
omission. Trade codes cannot create keeper liability where
Parliament has not.
Conclusion: Parkmaven have not rebutted the single determinative
point. They have not shown any NTK wording that invites the
keeper to pay as required by 9(2)(e)(i). On that ground alone
the appeal must be allowed. If POPLA takes a different view,
please identify the exact NTK sentence that constitutes the
9(2)(e)(i) keeper-payment invitation. Absent that, the keeper is
not liable in law.[/quote]
#Post#: 97939--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: Billy Butcher Date: November 13, 2025, 3:16 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Top man, I’ve seen in recent posts of yours that POPLA will
always reject appeals lol
#Post#: 106212--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: Billy Butcher Date: January 16, 2026, 12:04 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi, I have just received a reply from POPLA and of course my
appeal was unsuccessful and “I must pay” which I refuse to as I
know I am not in the wrong here. Am I screwed now ? What happens
from this point on as I have never gone through popla before ?
Thanks
#Post#: 106215--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: jfollows Date: January 16, 2026, 12:13 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The POPLA decision is in no way binding on you, but please post
it here for us to see.
You will get letters from debt collectors which we don’t need to
see and you can ignore other than telling us who they are from.
When you get a Letter of Claim please post it and we can advise.
#Post#: 106217--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: Billy Butcher Date: January 16, 2026, 12:28 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi, thanks for the reply. I am unsure how i send the email I
received from popla as there is no option to download it as a
pdf ( only print ) and I can copy and paste the link to here but
it will just ask you for the login details of mine for you to
view, so im not quite sure how I can show what was said
#Post#: 106219--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: jfollows Date: January 16, 2026, 12:39 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/read-this-first-private-parking-charges-forum-guide/
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/announcements/posting-images/#new
#Post#: 106223--------------------------------------------------
Re: Who TF is ParkMaven
By: Billy Butcher Date: January 16, 2026, 12:58 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://ibb.co/0V93LWx8
(This should work )
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page