URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92474--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: October 2, 2025, 3:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       If you're on a desktop/laptop, if I remember rightly there's a
       browser extension called "Don't F*** With Paste" that
       circumvents such restrictions on copy/pasting.
       #Post#: 92481--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: sooty12113
       Date: October 2, 2025, 4:10 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       thanks I'll give that a try
       #Post#: 97541--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: sooty12113
       Date: November 10, 2025, 6:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I had the following response from the Adjudicator, further
       advice appreciated.
       "The Appellant should understand that the Adjudicator is not in
       a position to give legal advice to either of the parties but
       they are entitled to seek their own independent legal advice.
       The Adjudicator's role is to consider whether or not the parking
       charge has a basis in law and was properly issued in the
       circumstances of each individual case. In all Appeals the
       Adjudicator is bound by the relevant law applicable at the time
       and is only able to consider legal challenges and not factual
       mistakes nor extenuating or mitigating circumstances. Throughout
       this appeal the Operator has had the opportunity consider all
       points raised and could have conceded the appeal at any stage.
       The Adjudicator who deals with this Appeal is legally qualified
       and each case is dealt with according to their understanding of
       the law as it applies and the legal principles involved. A
       decision by an Adjudicator is not legally binding on an
       Appellant who is entitled to seek their own legal advice if they
       so wish.
       The signage in the roadway where the Appellant parked is
       prominent, clear and unequivocal; controlled land - no parking.
       The Appellant's vehicle is recorded as entering the site at
       11.16, the vehicle turning around and parking at 11.17, the
       driver leaving the vehicle, later returning at 13.53 and driving
       off.
       Having considered all the issues raised and the evidence
       submitted, I am satisfied that the Appellant should have seen
       the prominent signage, should have realised that parking here
       was not allowed, and the operator has established that the
       Parking Charge was properly issued in accordance with the law.
       This appeal therefore has to be dismissed. "
       #Post#: 97547--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: b789
       Date: November 10, 2025, 6:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You were warned that the IAS is a kangaroo court. Their decision
       is not binding on you and you DO NOT pay it.
       These points have not been addressed by the 'barista' that
       penned that response:
       1. Keeper liability not addressed. Your core PoFA points (no
       period of parking, no relevant land, defective 9(2)(e)(i)/(f),
       posting) weren’t engaged with. If PoFA fails, the keeper cannot
       be liable—full stop—so signage/behaviour is irrelevant to the
       keeper.
       2. Prohibitive signage = no contract. “Controlled land – no
       parking” is prohibitive. That is not an offer capable of
       acceptance; it sounds in trespass (if anything) and only the
       landholder could sue for nominal loss. Contractual “charges”
       don’t flow from a prohibition.
       3. Unsupported factual findings. The adjudicator states the
       driver “parked,” “left the vehicle,” returned at 13:53, then
       drove off. Unless the operator filed continuous video or patrol
       notes, that’s speculation from entry/exit timestamps, not proof
       of a parking period exceeding any consideration/grace time.
       4. Landowner authority ignored. No contemporaneous, signed
       agreement meeting PPSCoP §14.1(a)–(j) appears to have been
       produced. That goes to standing. It was side-stepped.
       5. Period of parking still missing. A padded single timestamp
       (“immediately preceding… 13:54”) is not a PoFA 9(2)(a) “period
       of parking”. Your Brennan point stands.
       6. Site identification gap. If the NtK only said “Nova” without
       a full address/postcode, 9(2)(a) “relevant land” identification
       fails.
       You can now safely ignore all debt recovery letters that are
       going to come your way. Debt collectors are powerless to do
       anything except to try and intimidate the low-hanging fruit on
       the gullible tree to pay up out of ignorance and fear.
       Come back if/when you receive a Letter of Claim (LoC).
       #Post#: 97549--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: sooty12113
       Date: November 10, 2025, 6:41 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Great, thanks for the super speedy response
       #Post#: 115402--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: sooty12113
       Date: April 9, 2026, 3:31 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I've now received a "letter before claim" from Moorside Legal, I
       assume I still wait until this changes into a claim ?
       #Post#: 115403--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: April 9, 2026, 3:34 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No, a letter of claim should be responded to, please show us.
       #Post#: 115405--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: sooty12113
       Date: April 9, 2026, 3:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thanks, see the links below
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/yo0cztvn0cqvoh0m1ho5x/Moorside-Legal-4-3-26-front.jpg?rlkey=jjqkorflgkzjo15t6pnj6znl7&st=i6o2zgsa&dl=0
  HTML https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/90y9264h4nni4bn2pv8ml/Moorside-Legal-4-3-26-back.jpg?rlkey=awv7af9u4t5py847psv3riogc&st=h7p8q1tr&dl=0
       #Post#: 115668--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Private Parking Ticket - wasn't aware on private land 
   DIR By: sooty12113
       Date: April 13, 2026, 1:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any suggestions on a response ? it was headed as a "letter
       before claim" it isn't yet an actual claim
       *****************************************************
       Page 3 of 3
   DIR Previous Page