URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 10550--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 18, 2023, 3:50 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
  HTML http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?showtopic=152102&view=getlastpost
       They get a mention.
       S.M:  please reply to me via e mail.
       #Post#: 10839--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 21, 2023, 1:55 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Caught up at last. :D  Sorry got my threads mixed up.  Wait for
       the EN.
       #Post#: 11525--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: November 29, 2023, 6:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For later:
       The Waltham Forest (Bus Lanes) (No. 1) Traffic Order 2001
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=139XaisFpq3_S4cLuX4eW3Cd64jmQHAcC
       The Waltham Forest (Bus Lanes) (No. 1 2001) (Amendment No. 8)
       Traffic Order 2007
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1lfd_ecu1KMng82-Pests4854tVZrPAnw
       Corrigendum
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1tDqnU1SKHgSTDKvCv_sJsU7BnbU1yz1R
       I haven't checked if it's material, but I don't think the
       corrigendum can have any legal effect as it purports to alter
       the substantive effect of the order, if it does become material
       we have the Montague Avenue cases that dealt with that issue.
       #Post#: 11532--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: November 29, 2023, 9:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Noted.
       #Post#: 12091--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: S.M
       Date: December 8, 2023, 10:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I thought they should be sending a notice to owner but instead
       they sent this today 08/12/23
       Do i need to make another representation?
       [attachment deleted by admin]
       #Post#: 12101--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: December 8, 2023, 12:59 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       My advice is as follows when I see what you originally wrote:
       Dear Waltham Forest
       Ref:  PCN.......................VRM............................
       I require you to consider my original challenge as my formal
       representations against the Enforcement Notice.
       Please cancel the PCN therefore.
       Yours faithfully
       Name
       Address
       #Post#: 12423--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: S.M
       Date: December 14, 2023, 7:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > My advice is as follows when I see what you originally wrote:
       >
       >
       > Dear Waltham Forest
       >
       > Ref:
       PCN.......................VRM............................
       >
       > I require you to consider my original challenge as my formal
       representations against the Enforcement Notice.
       >
       > Please cancel the PCN therefore.
       >
       > Yours faithfully
       >
       > Name
       >
       > Address
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I did just that - let`s see what they come back with. Thanks
       #Post#: 12436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: December 14, 2023, 10:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry if I am blind; but, I cannot find what your original
       challenge stated and I am just guessing from their initial
       rejection letter and what had been discussed re the signage what
       was in your challenge.
       #Post#: 12439--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: S.M
       Date: December 14, 2023, 11:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > Sorry if I am blind; but, I cannot find what your original
       challenge stated and I am just guessing from their initial
       rejection letter and what had been discussed re the signage what
       was in your challenge.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       yes that was the basis of the challenge along with pictures that
       I sent
       #Post#: 12823--------------------------------------------------
       Re: WalthamForest, 34 - Being in a Bus Lane, High Road Leyton
       (Bus Lane) E10
   DIR By: Glitch
       Date: December 22, 2023, 11:55 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just a thought on the lack of visibility of the 958B sign and
       ignoring the driver behaviour after parking.
       Traffic Signs Manual Chapter 3
       Section 9.3.8 says:
       '...There is no specific requirement to use the road marking in
       conjunction with diagram 959B
       which means that they need not be placed together at particular
       locations. It is for the traffic
       authority to determine the number of upright signs and road
       markings that are required and
       where they are placed. However, the marking must not be used as
       a substitute for diagram
       959B, relying only on diagram 958 to indicate the vehicles
       permitted to use the lane; the
       Regulations prescribe the marking as being a bus lane that may
       be used by vehicles indicated
       on the sign to diagram 959B'
       If I read this correctly there MUST be a 958B and they cannot
       rely on 'Bus Lane' road marking to convey the restriction.
       There are no repeater 958B's I can see on GSV since the start of
       the bus lane which is way, way back.
       *****************************************************
       Page 5 of 7
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page