URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 91247--------------------------------------------------
       PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: Sonu rocks
       Date: September 24, 2025, 6:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Received a PCN for parking on private land. Please see the
       images below:
  HTML https://ibb.co/svjmLb3j
  HTML https://ibb.co/Cp0LySN2
       Any help would be highly appreciated.
       #Post#: 91253--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: September 24, 2025, 6:33 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Don’t identify the driver, because with no period of parking the
       PCN does not allow liability to be transferred from the unknown
       driver to you, the registered keeper.
       Plenty of appeals here, such as
       --- Quote ---
       > I am the keeper of the vehicle and I dispute your 'parking
       charge'. I deny any liability or contractual agreement and I
       will be making a complaint about your predatory conduct to your
       client landowner.
       >
       > As your Notice to Keeper (NtK) does not fully comply with ALL
       the requirements of PoFA 2012, you are unable to hold the keeper
       of the vehicle liable for the charge. Partial or even
       substantial compliance is not sufficient. There will be no
       admission as to who was driving and no inference or assumptions
       can be drawn. PPS has relied on contract law allegations of
       breach against the driver only.
       >
       > The registered keeper cannot be presumed or inferred to have
       been the driver, nor pursued under some twisted interpretation
       of the law of agency. Your NtK can only hold the driver liable.
       PPS have no hope should you be so stupid as to try and litigate,
       so you are urged to save us both a complete waste of time and
       cancel the PCN.
       --- End Quote ---
       The appeal will be rejected because they always are, but come
       back here when it is.
       #Post#: 94274--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: Sonu rocks
       Date: October 16, 2025, 4:24 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Please see below, the appeal got rejected.
  HTML https://ibb.co/SXkyn5Kv
       Please advise
       #Post#: 94277--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: jfollows
       Date: October 16, 2025, 4:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       That’s not a rejection, yet, it’s a fishing exercise trying to
       get you to name the driver. In due course you will get a
       rejection along with a POPLA code.
       #Post#: 94404--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 16, 2025, 3:22 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can have a bit of fun with them by responding with the
       following:
       --- Quote ---
       > Dear PPS Appeals Team,
       >
       > Thank you for your impressively misconstrued attempt to
       paraphrase Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012.
       Paragraph 2 of Schedule 4 does not, as you seem to imagine, hand
       you a magic right to pursue the keeper. It merely establishes a
       rebuttable presumption — a concept that appears to have escaped
       your grasp, perhaps due to intellectual malnutrition.
       >
       > Your citation of section 21.16 of the BPA Code of Practice is
       equally misplaced. Your reference to “section 21.16 of the BPA
       Code of Practice” is even more tragic, since the PPS Code of
       Practice (now superseded by the Private Parking Single Code of
       Practice) contains no such clause.
       >
       > Nothing authorise you to “pursue the keeper” simply because
       they decline to identify the driver. That right arises only if
       and when every condition of Schedule 4 has been met — something
       your firm rarely manages on its best day.
       >
       > I suggest you pass this to a responsible adult within your
       company, ideally someone with at least a passing familiarity
       with statutory interpretation. Until then, please stop
       embarrassing your organisation with letters that read like they
       were written by someone who has not yet achieved a high school
       education.
       >
       > Yours faithfully,
       >
       > [name]
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 105600--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: Sonu rocks
       Date: January 12, 2026, 3:56 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello again,
       Received a letter from the debt recovery company.
  HTML https://ibb.co/d0C6L6NN
       Please advise.
       #Post#: 105604--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: January 12, 2026, 4:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What has happened in 3 months since you last posted? Did you get
       a POPLA code? If not, did you chase them for one?
       #Post#: 105749--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: Sonu rocks
       Date: January 13, 2026, 1:27 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Did not receive any other communication. Should I ask them about
       POPLA?
       #Post#: 106108--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: Sonu rocks
       Date: January 15, 2026, 5:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What should I write that I did not receive any communication
       about POPLA?
       #Post#: 106119--------------------------------------------------
       Re: PCN recevied for parking on private land - Matisse Road,
       Hounslow.
   DIR By: InterCity125
       Date: January 16, 2026, 1:59 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Do not communicate with the debt collector.
       Any communication should be with the parking operator using the
       email address on the original NtK.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 2
   DIR Next Page