URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92300--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: October 1, 2025, 5:32 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Councils invariably reject all informal challenges, because they
       know that if they do, most people then just cough-up.
       #Post#: 92355--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: advicewelcome
       Date: October 1, 2025, 9:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > Councils invariably reject all informal challenges, because
       they know that if they do, most people then just cough-up.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks. They did write a very specific letter back indicating
       that a "YY" attempt was not enough (below)
       That said, what are the chances of winning considering the facts
       of this case? - because if I know the approx % chance of winning
       I can make a calculations if its worth pursuing? I just want to
       be realistic.
       **ECONOMY & INFRASTRUCTURE DIRECTORATE**
       Council House, Manor Square,
       Solihull, West Midlands B91 3QB
       [www.solihull.gov.uk](
  HTML http://www.solihull.gov.uk
       )
       **Date:** 18 September 2025
       **Notice of Rejection of Informal Representation/Challenge**
       Traffic Management Act 2004 S78
       **PENALTY CHARGE NOTICE NUMBER:**
       **DATE OF ISSUE:** 24/08/2025 at 17:09
       **VEHICLE REGISTRATION NUMBER:**
       **LOCATION OF CONTRAVENTION:** Tudor Grange Leisure Centre
       ---
       Thank you for writing to us.
       We have carefully considered what you say but we have decided
       not to cancel your Penalty Charge Notice (PCN).
       You were issued a PCN for not having a Pay & Display ticket that
       was both valid and clearly displayed. Even if you have a Pay &
       Display ticket, you must display it so that a Civil Enforcement
       Officer (CEO) can see all its details.
       Before issuing PCNs, our CEOs check for any parking items
       displayed and record the details. The CEO saw an invalid Pay &
       Display ticket. This can happen, for example, when people do not
       input the correct registration when obtaining a ticket via the
       machine.
       I have taken a further look into the ticket that was displayed
       when the PCN was issued and can confirm that you have inputted
       "YY", however your vehicle registration is "YYxxxxx". It remains
       the responsibility of the motorist to ensure that you input the
       correct vehicle registration when obtaining a ticket.
       Whilst I appreciate this was not intentional, this does not
       serve as grounds to cancel the Charge. Tickets are not dispensed
       until the user confirms the details inputted. In this instance
       it would have been advisable to have checked that all the
       information was correct before dispensing your ticket.
       It is expected that drivers check their ticket prior to being
       displayed to ensure that all details are correct. In doing this
       you would have been alerted to the incorrect registration that
       had been submitted.
       As you have contravened the parking regulations, I am unable to
       withdraw your PCN.
       ---
       **You have these choices:**
       * You can pay the discount charge of £25.00 if your payment
       reaches us within 14 days of the date of this letter.
       * You can pay £50.00 within 28 days of the date your PCN was
       issued.
       * You can formally challenge your PCN by using a Notice to Owner
       form. The vehicle’s owner will automatically receive the form if
       the PCN has not been paid within 28 days of being issued. The
       form offers you the chance to formally challenge your PCN or pay
       the full £50.00. If you decide to formally challenge your PCN,
       please do not write to us again but wait until the Notice to
       Owner form arrives.
       **How to pay:**
       * **Online** at
       [www.solihull.gov.uk](
  HTML http://www.solihull.gov.uk
       ). Go to
       ‘Parking’ and click ‘Pay a Parking Fine’.
       * **Telephone** 0121 704 8000
       * **Automated Telephone Payments** 0300 4560502
       * **By Cheque** – made payable to ‘Solihull Metropolitan Borough
       Council’ sent to: Parking Services, Council House, Solihull, B91
       3QB
       Yours sincerely,
       Parking Officer
       #Post#: 92392--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 1, 2025, 11:14 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       IMO, procedural improprieties abound in the PCN.
       (7) A penalty charge notice given under this regulation must
       include the information set out in—
       (a)Schedule 2, and
       (b)regulation 3(1) of the 2022 Appeals Regulations.
       Schedule 2
       Particulars to be included in a penalty charge notice given
       under regulation 9
       Para. 2
       (d)that the penalty charge must be paid within the period of 28
       days beginning with the date on which the alleged contravention
       occurred,
       (f)that if the penalty charge is not paid within the period of
       28 days referred to in sub-paragraph (d), a notice to owner may
       be served by the enforcement authority on the owner of the
       vehicle.
       2(f) Is NOT there.
       Regulation 3(1):
       3.—(1) A regulation 9 penalty charge notice must include the
       following information—
       (a)that a person on whom a notice to owner is served may, in
       accordance with these Regulations, make representations to the
       enforcement authority against the penalty charge and, if those
       representations are rejected, appeal to an adjudicator;
       (b)that if, before a notice to owner is served, representations
       against the penalty charge are received at such address as may
       be specified in the notice for the purpose those representations
       will be considered by the enforcement authority;
       (c)that if a notice to owner is served despite the
       representations mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), representations
       against the penalty charge must be made to the enforcement
       authority in the form and manner and at the time specified in
       the notice to owner.
       3(1)(c) is NOT there.
       #Post#: 92434--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: advicewelcome
       Date: October 1, 2025, 3:26 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > IMO, procedural improprieties abound in the PCN.
       >
       > (7) A penalty charge notice given under this regulation must
       include the information set out in—
       >
       > (a)Schedule 2, and
       >
       > (b)regulation 3(1) of the 2022 Appeals Regulations.
       >
       > Schedule 2
       >
       > Particulars to be included in a penalty charge notice given
       under regulation 9
       >
       > Para. 2
       > (d)that the penalty charge must be paid within the period of
       28 days beginning with the date on which the alleged
       contravention occurred,
       >
       >
       > (f)that if the penalty charge is not paid within the period of
       28 days referred to in sub-paragraph (d), a notice to owner may
       be served by the enforcement authority on the owner of the
       vehicle.
       >
       > 2(f) Is NOT there.
       >
       > Regulation 3(1):
       > 3.—(1) A regulation 9 penalty charge notice must include the
       following information—
       >
       > (a)that a person on whom a notice to owner is served may, in
       accordance with these Regulations, make representations to the
       enforcement authority against the penalty charge and, if those
       representations are rejected, appeal to an adjudicator;
       >
       > (b)that if, before a notice to owner is served,
       representations against the penalty charge are received at such
       address as may be specified in the notice for the purpose those
       representations will be considered by the enforcement authority;
       >
       > (c)that if a notice to owner is served despite the
       representations mentioned in sub-paragraph (b), representations
       against the penalty charge must be made to the enforcement
       authority in the form and manner and at the time specified in
       the notice to owner.
       >
       > 3(1)(c) is NOT there.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Procedural audit of the Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
       PCN, assessed against the statutory requirements under:
       - Regulation 9(7) of the Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic
       Contraventions (England) General Provisions Regulations 2022 (SI
       2022/71)
       - Schedule 2 of the same regulations
       - Regulation 3(1) of the Civil Enforcement of Road Traffic
       Contraventions (Representations and Appeals) (England)
       Regulations 2022 (SI 2022/576)
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       🚨 Procedural Audit of Solihull PCN (Regulation 9)
       [table][tr][td]Requirement[/td]
       [td]Legal Source[/td]
       [td]Compliance[/td]
       [td]Notes[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Payment deadline (28 days from contravention)[/td]
       [td]Schedule 2, para 2(d)[/td]
       [td]✅ Present[/td]
       [td]Clearly stated on front of PCN[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Notice to Owner may be served if unpaid[/td]
       [td]Schedule 2, para 2(f)[/td]
       [td]❌ Missing[/td]
       [td]No mention of NtO escalation if unpaid[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Right to make representations after NtO[/td]
       [td]Reg 3(1)(c)[/td]
       [td]❌ Missing[/td]
       [td]No info about formal reps post-NtO[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Right to make informal representations before NtO[/td]
       [td]Reg 3(1)(b)[/td]
       [td]✅ Present[/td]
       [td]Reverse side includes this right[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Right to appeal if reps rejected[/td]
       [td]Reg 3(1)(a)[/td]
       [td]✅ Present[/td]
       [td]Mentions adjudicator appeal process[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Address for informal representations[/td]
       [td]Reg 3(1)(b)[/td]
       [td]✅ Present[/td]
       [td]Solihull Connect address provided[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Contravention details (code, location, time)[/td]
       [td]Schedule 2, para 2(a–c)[/td]
       [td]✅ Present[/td]
       [td]Code 83, location, timestamp, vehicle info[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Discount period (14 days)[/td]
       [td]Schedule 2, para 2(e)[/td]
       [td]✅ Present[/td]
       [td]£25 if paid within 14 days[/td]
       [/tr]
       [tr][td]Clarity on date of service vs contravention[/td]
       [td]Reg 9(2)[/td]
       [td]⚠️ Ambiguous[/td]
       [td]Uses “date of service” but doesn’t clarify it’s same as
       contravention date[/td]
       [/tr]
       [/table]
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       🔍 Summary of Procedural Defects
       - Missing Schedule 2(f): No mention that a Notice to Owner may
       be served if unpaid.
       - Missing Regulation 3(1)(c): No info about formal
       representations after NtO.
       - Ambiguity in service date phrasing: Could confuse recipients
       about payment deadlines.
       These are mandatory inclusions under the 2022 regulations. Their
       absence constitutes procedural impropriety, which is valid
       grounds for cancellation under the Traffic Penalty Tribunal.
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       🚨 Key Procedural Improprieties
       1. Missing Notice to Owner Warning (Schedule 2, para 2(f))
       --- Quote ---
       > “...that if the penalty charge is not paid within the period
       of 28 days referred to in sub-paragraph (d), a notice to owner
       may be served…”
       --- End Quote ---
       - Why it matters: This informs the recipient of the next legal
       step. Its absence is a breach of mandatory content and has been
       upheld as a procedural impropriety in tribunal decisions.
       2. Missing Post-NtO Representation Rights (Reg 3(1)(c))
       --- Quote ---
       > “...representations against the penalty charge must be made to
       the enforcement authority in the form and manner and at the time
       specified in the notice to owner.”
       --- End Quote ---
       - Why it matters: The PCN must explain that even if informal
       reps are rejected, formal reps can be made after an NtO is
       served. This is a statutory safeguard, and its omission is a
       clear procedural defect.
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ⚠️ Additional Observations
       - Ambiguity in “date of service”: The PCN uses the phrase “date
       on which this PCN was served,” which is technically correct for
       a Regulation 9 PCN (served at the time of issue). However, it
       could be clearer by explicitly stating that the date of
       contravention and date of service are the same.
       - No mention of approved device: While not strictly required
       unless issued by camera, it’s good practice to state whether the
       PCN was based on direct observation or an approved device.
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       ✅ What’s Done Correctly
       - Clear contravention details
       - Proper discount period
       - Informal challenge instructions
       - Address for representations
       - Mention of adjudicator appeal rights
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       🧠 Strategic Takeaway
       Two solid procedural improprieties—both of which are mandatory
       inclusions under the regulations. These alone are sufficient
       grounds to challenge the PCN. If Solihull rejects your informal
       representation, you’ll have a strong case before the Traffic
       Penalty Tribunal.
       ... so you think high chance of TPT deciding in favour based on
       these things - let alone the other representations? - maybe 90%
       success rate?
       #Post#: 92436--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 1, 2025, 3:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You are expert at obfuscation: simplicity is not your forte!
       You are making formal reps to council officers, so I suggest
       simple and concise.
       This is not the Scopes trial or a submission to the Supreme
       Court.
       You keep asking about the likelihood of success expressed in
       percentage terms, but the answer is that no-one can foresee what
       could happen if the authority rejected your reps.
       #Post#: 92441--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: advicewelcome
       Date: October 1, 2025, 4:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > You are expert at obfuscation: simplicity is not your forte!
       >
       > You are making formal reps to council officers, so I suggest
       simple and concise.
       > This is not the Scopes trial or a submission to the Supreme
       Court.
       >
       > You keep asking about the likelihood of success expressed in
       percentage terms, but the answer is that no-one can foresee what
       could happen if the authority rejected your reps.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks. Didn't realise we are still with the council - thought
       next stage was TPT. Ok Fine - we are at Stage 3.
       You think I could send the reps via email to them and the
       councillor - get it nipped in the bud quicker then wait for
       NtO's? - I don't know if I will be at home address to receive
       docs in the future.
       🧭 Civil Enforcement Process: Regulation 9 PCN
       Stage 1: PCN Issued (On-Street or Handed to Driver)
       - Trigger: CEO observes a contravention and serves the PCN
       directly.
       - Deadline:
       - Pay £25 within 14 days (discounted rate)
       - Pay £50 within 28 days (full rate)
       - OR make informal representations within 28 days
       Stage 2: Informal Representations
       - To Whom: The enforcement authority (e.g. Solihull Council)
       - How: By post or online, using the address or portal listed on
       the PCN
       - Outcome:
       - If accepted → PCN cancelled
       - If rejected → You wait for the next formal stage
       Stage 3: Notice to Owner (NtO)
       - Trigger: If no payment is made within 28 days, or informal
       reps are rejected
       - Sent To: The registered keeper of the vehicle
       - Purpose: Formal demand for payment and invitation to make
       formal representations
       Stage 4: Formal Representations
       - To Whom: The enforcement authority, in response to the NtO
       - Deadline: Within 28 days of receiving the NtO
       - Grounds: Must be based on statutory grounds (e.g. procedural
       impropriety, contravention did not occur, etc.)
       - Outcome:
       - If accepted → PCN cancelled
       - If rejected → You receive a Notice of Rejection
       Stage 5: Appeal to Adjudicator
       - To Whom: The Traffic Penalty Tribunal (independent
       adjudicator)
       - Deadline: Within 28 days of the Notice of Rejection
       - Process: Online or postal appeal; no fee required
       - Outcome:
       - If upheld → PCN cancelled
       - If dismissed → You must pay the full charge
       Stage 6: Charge Certificate
       - Trigger: If no appeal is made or payment is not received
       - Consequence: Charge increases by 50% (e.g. £50 → £75)
       Stage 7: Order for Recovery & Bailiff Action
       - Final Steps:
       - Debt registered at Traffic Enforcement Centre
       - Enforcement agents (bailiffs) may be instructed if unpaid
       #Post#: 93015--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: advicewelcome
       Date: October 6, 2025, 6:09 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Just curious - if the council can't be ars*d to fix things, do
       they have the right to ask the public to drag their butts up and
       down a hill to find another kiosk machine? Now't due for the
       first 3hrs so assume you can't pay by phone for it.
       Does faulty kiosk mean we are automatically off the hook?
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/9fvrPrzP/IMG-20251005-162329-DRO.jpg
       #Post#: 93017--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: October 6, 2025, 6:12 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Does faulty kiosk mean we are automatically off the hook?
       No.
       #Post#: 93774--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: advicewelcome
       Date: October 11, 2025, 7:44 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, nto arrived...
       [img width=144.99998474121094
       height=179.99998474121094]
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/BPcXfygf/page1-2025-10-11-233814-1.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://postimg.cc/BPcXfygf
       [img width=141.98863220214844
       height=179.99998474121094]
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/sG9vC8cd/page2-2025-10-11-233855-2.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://postimg.cc/sG9vC8cd
       [img width=140.98483276367188
       height=179.99998474121094]
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/q6XzHYLd/page3-2025-10-11-233953-2.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://postimg.cc/q6XzHYLd
       [img width=123.99620056152344
       height=179.99998474121094]
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/y3XkC5Pq/page4-2025-10-11-234538-2.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://postimg.cc/y3XkC5Pq
       [img width=143.99620056152344
       height=179.99998474121094]
  HTML https://i.postimg.cc/GTJHnNQC/page5-2025-10-11-235042-2.jpg[/img]
  HTML https://postimg.cc/GTJHnNQC
       Link to Gallery
  HTML https://postimg.cc/gallery/ZvtZtRR
       Do I just send the previous response in and fingers x-ed?....
       Subject: Formal Appeal Against PCN OHXXXXXXXX – Tudor Grange
       Leisure Centre, 24/08/2025
       To Whom It May Concern,
       I am writing to ascertain assistance in regard to Penalty Charge
       Notice OHXXXXXXXX, issued on 24/08/2025 at Tudor Grange Leisure
       Centre Car Park. I respectfully request cancellation of the PCN
       on the grounds of factual compliance, procedural unfairness, and
       breach of statutory duties under the Equality Act 2010 and the
       Traffic Management Act 2004.
       1. Factual Background
       A valid Pay & Display ticket was obtained at 16:03 on
       24/08/2025, covering parking until 18:00.
       The ticket was clearly displayed on the dashboard, as evidenced
       in the attached photograph.
       Due to visual impairment and poor machine interface design, the
       vehicle registration mark (VRM) was entered incorrectly.
       The Civil Enforcement Officer issued the PCN at 17:08, despite
       the vehicle being covered for the full duration and parked in a
       marked bay.
       2. Compliance with the Traffic Regulation Order (TRO OH05)
       The relevant clauses of the Solihull TRO OH05 state:
       Clause 6(1):
       “The Driver of a vehicle using a pay and display Parking Place
       shall upon leaving the vehicle in the Parking Place, and on
       payment of a charge, purchase a Pay and Display Ticket at the
       level of charge and for the period required in accordance with
       the instructions on the machine…”
       Clause 6(2):
       “The Driver shall display the Pay and Display Ticket issued in
       respect of the vehicle in a conspicuous position on the
       dashboard or fascia of the vehicle so that the ticket is clearly
       visible from the outside of the vehicle.”
       Clause 6(3):
       “A Pay and Display Ticket shall be valid only for the vehicle
       in respect of which it was issued and for the Parking Place in
       which it was issued.”
       I complied with all three clauses:
       The correct charge was paid.
       The ticket was displayed conspicuously.
       The ticket was issued for the correct location and used by the
       driver of the vehicle in question.
       The TRO does not explicitly require perfect VRM entry for a
       ticket to be valid. Enforcement based solely on machine
       instructions—without clear incorporation into the TRO—is legally
       unsound and ultra vires.
       3. Equality Act 2010 – Reasonable Adjustments
       Under Sections 20 and 29 of the Equality Act 2010, Solihull
       Council has a duty to make reasonable adjustments for disabled
       service users.
       The machine interface was inaccessible when there are visually
       impairment and challenging light conditions.
       The failure to accommodate this barrier, and the refusal to
       cancel the PCN despite being informed, constitutes indirect
       discrimination.
       The Council must consider the Public Sector Equality Duty
       (Section 149) to eliminate discrimination and advance equality
       of opportunity.
       4. Statutory Guidance – Discretion and Fairness
       Under the Statutory Guidance to Local Authorities on Civil
       Parking Enforcement (TMA 2004, Section 87):
       Quote
       “An authority has a discretionary power to cancel a PCN at any
       point throughout the process. It can do this even when an
       undoubted contravention has occurred if the authority deems it
       to be appropriate in the circumstances of the case.”
       Quote
       “Under general principles of public law, authorities have a duty
       to act fairly and proportionately and are encouraged to exercise
       discretion sensibly and reasonably and with due regard to the
       public interest. Failure to act in accordance with the general
       principles of public law may lead to a claim for a decision to
       be judicially reviewed.”
       In this case, the contravention—if any—was minor, unintentional,
       and caused by accessibility barriers. The vehicle was parked
       lawfully, paid for, and caused no harm. The Council’s refusal to
       exercise discretion is disproportionate and contrary to public
       law principles.
       Furthermore, the guidance states:
       Quote
       “Authorities should formulate (with advice from their legal
       department) and then publish their policies on the exercise of
       discretion. They should apply these policies flexibly and judge
       each case on its merits. An enforcement authority should be
       ready to depart from its policies if the particular
       circumstances of the case warrant it.”
       Quote
       “The enforcement authority should have clear policies,
       instructions and training available on how to exercise such
       authority. These policies should form the basis for staff
       training and should be published.”
       To date, Solihull Council has not previously published any such
       discretionary policy, nor provided evidence that staff are
       trained to apply discretion fairly and flexibly. This omission
       undermines transparency, accountability, and the Council’s legal
       obligations under the guidance.
       5. Remedy Sought
       I respectfully request that the PCN be cancelled on the grounds
       that:
       The parking was paid for and covered the relevant time.
       The error was minor and caused by accessibility barriers.
       The TRO does not support enforcement for VRM entry errors.
       The Council has a statutory duty to act fairly and make
       reasonable adjustments.
       The Council has failed to publish or apply a discretionary
       policy as required under statutory guidance.
       Should this appeal be rejected, I intend to escalate the matter
       to the Traffic Penalty Tribunal and, if necessary, raise a
       formal complaint regarding breach of the Equality Act and
       failure to act proportionately.
       Thank you for your attention to this matter.
       Yours faithfully,
       [Name]
       [Email Address]
       [Vehicle Registration]
       [PCN Reference]
       #Post#: 97430--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Council Kiosk User Interface Issues - do I have a hope in
       hell?
   DIR By: advicewelcome
       Date: November 8, 2025, 7:07 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Well, well....  ;D
       ECONOMY & INFRASTRUCTURE DIRECTORATE
       Council House, Manor Square,
       www.solihull.gov.uk
       Date: 05 November 2025
       NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE
       Of representations against Notice to Owner -Traffic Management
       Act 2004 S78
       Thank you for writing to us.
       I am writing to inform you that the Council has decided to
       cancel the PCN. However, I must advise you
       that the decision has been taken to cancel the above stated PCN
       on different grounds and not on the
       grounds you raised in your grounds of appeal. Therefore, the
       Notice has now been closed and there is no
       outstanding balance.
       Please be advised that this does not set a precedent for future
       notices, as each case js treated on its own
       merits. It is imperative that motorists always comply with
       traffic regulations, and it is only in extreme
       situations where consideration is given to mitigation.
       The Authority reserves the right to judge which circumstances
       are considered extreme, and decide
       accordingly whether to accept or reject a representation
       If you get another PCN in similar circumstances, we may not be
       able to cancel it.
       Yours sincerely
       Parking Officer
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page