URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 90132--------------------------------------------------
       Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without valid
       pay & display ticket
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: September 16, 2025, 4:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good day,
       I have been issued with a PCN from Richmond Council for
       contravention code 06P (parking without a valid pay and display
       ticket). I stopped at the pharmacy to buy medicine for my son
       who had a high temperature, I saw the CEO as I parked and he
       said its ok to stop but I should not take longer than 5 mins in
       the pharmacy. Unfortunately the card machine in the pharmacy was
       not working hence I had to go and draw out cash from the ATM,
       the whole process took exactly 6 mins and when I returned to my
       car I was shocked to see a PCN had been issued. I am quite angry
       at the CEO as I feel he acted in a deceitful way and actually
       intended to issue a PCN all along.
       The PCN mentions that the CEO observed my vehicle from 09:39 to
       09:45 yet the timestamp on the photo does not show this?
       Is there any grounds for appeal here from the attached PCN and
       photo evidence?
  HTML https://freeimage.host/i/KAZ3NxS
       
  HTML https://freeimage.host/i/KAZ3jb2
       
  HTML https://freeimage.host/i/KAZ3hOl
  HTML https://freeimage.host/i/KAZSeZ7
       Many thanks,
       #Post#: 90141--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: stamfordman
       Date: September 16, 2025, 4:47 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Where is this on Google Maps.
       #Post#: 90143--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: September 16, 2025, 4:53 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: stamfordman link ---
       >
       > Where is this on Google Maps.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/Rbv74FQqz5DuKabXA
       #Post#: 90147--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: September 16, 2025, 5:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I am quite angry at the CEO as I feel he acted in a deceitful
       way and actually intended to issue a PCN all along.
       Why? According to you he gave you conditional permission to park
       where you would otherwise not have been permitted unless you
       paid, but you did not comply with those conditions.
       What has getting money from an ATM got to do with your son's
       condition or your parking, you weren't paying to park anyway(not
       that you'd have needed cash).
       There are some free parking provisions for residents of
       Richmond, do you qualify?
  HTML https://www.richmond.gov.uk/services/parking/parking_machines/parking_machine_guide
       IMO, it's the wrong contravention: display is optional if
       there's a RingGo alternative. It should be failure to pay the
       parking charge.
       #Post#: 90150--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: September 16, 2025, 5:21 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > I am quite angry at the CEO as I feel he acted in a deceitful
       way and actually intended to issue a PCN all along.
       >
       > Why? According to you he gave you conditional permission to
       park where you would otherwise not have been permitted unless
       you paid, but you did not comply with those conditions.
       >
       > What has getting money from an ATM got to do with your son's
       condition or your parking, you weren't paying to park anyway(not
       that you'd have needed cash).
       >
       > There are some free parking provisions for residents of
       Richmond, do you qualify?
       >
       >
  HTML https://www.richmond.gov.uk/services/parking/parking_machines/parking_machine_guide
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       What I am saying is that having to get cash from the ATM meant I
       ended up taking longer than anticipated and hence overstayed the
       5 minutes offered by the CEO. Unfortunately I am not a resident
       Richmond so I do not qualify :(
       I notice none of the parking signs mention paying via Ringo,
       however, on the pay and display machine there is the option to
       pay via Ringo?
       #Post#: 90156--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: September 16, 2025, 5:42 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You getting cash is not something you can visit on the CEO as
       you must surely realise. I'd forget this.
       Was the sequence of events that you parked, went straight to the
       pharmacy, got the medicine and then went via an ATM machine
       before returning to the car and that this took longer than the
       CEO had specified.
       Was your son with you?
       IMO, you should focus on what seems to be a clear the procedural
       error.
       #Post#: 90157--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: September 16, 2025, 5:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > You getting cash is not something you can visit on the CEO as
       you must surely realise. I'd forget this.
       >
       > Was the sequence of events that you parked, went straight to
       the pharmacy, got the medicine and then went via an ATM machine
       before returning to the car and that this took longer than the
       CEO had specified.
       >
       > Was your son with you?
       >
       > IMO, you should focus on what seems to be a clear the
       procedural error.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Yes that is the correct sequence of events. OK I will draft some
       kind of appeal based on the procedural error, just to clarify
       none of the parking signs mention pay by phone and only mention
       pay at machine display ticket so this is still a procedural
       error, correct?
       #Post#: 90209--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: September 16, 2025, 9:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Two errors IMO:
       The sign is incorrect;
       The contravention is incorrect.
       I would start with your account, the CEO's conditional
       permission and that for reasons beyond your control it took you
       longer to get back to the car than agreed with the CEO*. In this
       regard, you therefore parked without permission or having
       obtained parking rights. On which point, I would draw the
       authority's attention to the following:
       The traffic sign in evidence states: Pay at machine. Display
       ticket.
       The machine accepts payment and advises that parking rights may
       be obtained via RingGo, which is also confirmed on the council's
       website.
       The alleged contravention is that of failing to display a
       ticket, NOT failure to pay.
       It therefore follows that:
       The traffic sign in evidence is incorrect because display of a
       ticket is not an obligation; and
       The contravention is wrong for the same reasons.
       Either constitutes a statutory and therefore the PCN must be
       cancelled. If the council wants to enforce this bay then they
       must amend the traffic sign and use a mandated contravention
       description.
       #Post#: 90217--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: Johnsmith86
       Date: September 16, 2025, 10:50 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: H C Andersen link ---
       >
       > Two errors IMO:
       >
       > The sign is incorrect;
       > The contravention is incorrect.
       >
       > I would start with your account, the CEO's conditional
       permission and that for reasons beyond your control it took you
       longer to get back to the car than agreed with the CEO*. In this
       regard, you therefore parked without permission or having
       obtained parking rights. On which point, I would draw the
       authority's attention to the following:
       >
       > The traffic sign in evidence states: Pay at machine. Display
       ticket.
       > The machine accepts payment and advises that parking rights
       may be obtained via RingGo, which is also confirmed on the
       council's website.
       > The alleged contravention is that of failing to display a
       ticket, NOT failure to pay.
       >
       > It therefore follows that:
       >
       > The traffic sign in evidence is incorrect because display of a
       ticket is not an obligation; and
       > The contravention is wrong for the same reasons.
       >
       > Either constitutes a statutory and therefore the PCN must be
       cancelled. If the council wants to enforce this bay then they
       must amend the traffic sign and use a mandated contravention
       description.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Many thanks for your help with this, however, the PCN does
       mention contravention code 06P - Parked without clearly
       displaying a valid pay & display ticket or voucher?
       #Post#: 90239--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Richmond Council - PCN Contravention 06P - Parked without
       valid pay & display ticket
   DIR By: H C Andersen
       Date: September 16, 2025, 12:21 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Exactly and it MAY NOT.
       How could it be a contravention for not doing something which is
       OPTIONAL i.e. you could EITHER pay and display OR pay via
       RingGo?
       Answer: IMO, it isn't.
       I think I've set this out as clearly as I can.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 3
   DIR Next Page