URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 106924--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: January 22, 2026, 4:23 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > I see no PCN has been posted yet, so please do so. Look at the
       legislation at the top of the PCN. the 56 day limit to reply to
       formal reps against a Notice to Owner only applies to the
       Traffic Management Act 2004.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Slightly embarrassing there, I have mislaid the front page photo
       copy I took. I only have the second page and a copy of my
       written additional comments. I can view online but it's not the
       actual PCN that comes up.
       #Post#: 106929--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith & Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: January 22, 2026, 5:30 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Actually......I took a photo of the PCN, which I've just
       found......I thought I'd originally posted it, although all my
       photo links don't work from the device I'm replying from,
       perhaps they have expired - it's been so long!
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/z5XM4KR[img<br
       />width=600]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/p/z5XM4KR[/img]
       #Post#: 106931--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: January 22, 2026, 5:39 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       [quote author=almep13 link=topic=8065.msg106859#msg106859
       date=1769029513]
       Hi sjcuk7,
       Thanks for your reply.
       My case is at London Tribunals scheduled for a video-hearing in
       March 2026.
       Let's keep one-another updated with the outcomes of our appeals.
       Thanks and regards,
       Almep13
       [/quote
       Hey Almep13,
       Now that I'm worried about my case returning to bite, I've
       looked through your pictures more closely and can see you have a
       warning sign behind a tree on Hartswood Road pictured.
       My photo from last Sept shows it had been removed!!
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/d5n1vCZ
       [img width=600]
  HTML https://imgpile.com/m/d5n1vCZ[/img]
       #Post#: 106979--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 22, 2026, 10:45 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       OK, so PCN confirms my guess it was served under the LLA & TfL
       Act 2003. This means there is no 56 day limit to respond to
       formal representations, but the delay in replying is excessive,
       so this should be one of your points at the adjudication.
       #Post#: 106999--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: January 22, 2026, 12:11 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > OK, so PCN confirms my guess it was served under the LLA & TfL
       Act 2003. This means there is no 56 day limit to respond to
       formal representations, but the delay in replying is excessive,
       so this should be one of your points at the adjudication.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Thanks......we'll have to wait I guess.
       Out of interest, would you or anyone else advise calling them or
       just sitting it out?
       I'm curious as to how the missing warning sign will play out,
       it's clearly in place in Almep13's pictures from July, but gone
       by my alleged contravention in September last year.
       #Post#: 107020--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 22, 2026, 4:08 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Why call them ? You have a date for the adjudication, and they
       have plenty of time to consider their extremely tardy response
       to your reps, so hopefully will DNC when the time approaches.
       #Post#: 107033--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pede
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: January 22, 2026, 5:35 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > Why call them ? You have a date for the adjudication, and they
       have plenty of time to consider their extremely tardy response
       to your reps, so hopefully will DNC when the time approaches.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I may be missing something or you're confusing me with Almep13,
       I don't have any such date - however they do as they mentioned
       here, on my thread.
       So, with that in mind, do you think I should follow my PCN
       Notice to Owner up?
       #Post#: 107036--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: January 22, 2026, 6:03 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Sorry, it was indeed almep13 who posted with a date. Have you
       applied to London Tribunals yet ?
       #Post#: 107054--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: almep13
       Date: January 23, 2026, 3:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good morning,
       I am glad to announce that London Tribunals emailed me this
       morning to say that LBHF won't contest my appeal with Case
       Reference: 2250576030, hence my PCN is now cancelled.
       You may use the Case Ref supporting your appeal if it comes to
       that. Just keep the faith and do your research if needed and
       you'll succeed in the end.
       In regard to the sign, I believe the sign is still there, but
       covered by the tree branches.
       Thanks to the forum and its members like Incadescent, my appeal
       was successful.
       Thanks and regards,
       Almep13
       #Post#: 107134--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Hammersmith &amp; Fulham - code 53C Failing to comply with a
       restriction on vehicles entering a pedestri
   DIR By: sjcuk7
       Date: January 23, 2026, 11:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > Sorry, it was indeed almep13 who posted with a date. Have you
       applied to London Tribunals yet ?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I have nothing to go to a tribunal about as of yet. That's sort
       of what I was getting at in asking if I should ring them. If
       they don't contact me maybe this will remain open on their
       system indefinitely.
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 3
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page