DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 103452--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston council Contravention code 232 - parked in a place
       not designated for that vehicle. 
   DIR By: IanO
       Date: December 21, 2025, 10:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
       >
       > [quote author=IanO link=topic=8046.msg89829#msg89829
       date=1757796777]
       > Sure, how does that work?
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Ref: PCN  VRM
       I challenge this PCN as follows:
       The wording of the PCN in terms of the 28 days period is wrong
       since it does not comply with Schedule 2 para. 2 @
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2022/71/schedule/2
       (d)that the penalty charge must be paid within the period of 28
       days beginning with the date on which the alleged contravention
       occurred,
       In light of this procedural impropriety please cancel the PCN.
       [/quote]
       Hello,
       I received a NTO. Do I still stand a decent chance at tribunal
       with the above argument? I haven't been able to find any
       precedents yet.
       Images of the NTO below (I'm on day 13 from the date of the NTO,
       was away for work for part of that).
       The NTO does state that the penalty charge must be paid no later
       than the last day of the period of 28 days beginning with the
       date on which "the NTO is served". How do I know when it was
       served? It's not necessarily the same date as the posting date.
  HTML https://ibb.co/N2Bh0P0S
  HTML https://ibb.co/fYSx2JKN
  HTML https://ibb.co/n8fVVcMx
  HTML https://ibb.co/jvY7FLKH
  HTML https://ibb.co/RTyP211C
       #Post#: 103491--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston council Contravention code 232 - parked in a place
       not designated for that vehicle. 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: December 21, 2025, 3:38 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote ---
       > The NTO does state that the penalty charge must be paid no
       later than the last day of the period of 28 days beginning with
       the date on which "the NTO is served". How do I know when it was
       served? It's not necessarily the same date as the posting date.
       --- End Quote ---
       There is an Act that defines expected mail delivery times, that
       for 1st Class post being 2 days from date of posting. ALl postal
       PCNs have a date and the law is that they must be posted 1st
       Class on the same day.  Quite how one proves otherwise is beyond
       me.
       #Post#: 107018--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Kingston council Contravention code 232 - parked in a place
       not designated for that vehicle. 
   DIR By: IanO
       Date: January 22, 2026, 3:54 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hello,
       I received a Notice of Rejection.
       I am trying to find precedents to support the procedural
       impropriety mentioned by [member=24]Hippocrates[/member]  but
       have so far been unsuccessful.
       Is anybody aware of any please to include in my tribunal appeal?
       Or is my likelihood of a successful appeal quite low and I
       should just cut my losses?
       NOR:
  HTML https://ibb.co/nZYKYBZ
  HTML https://ibb.co/bML3YFrp
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page