URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 8515--------------------------------------------------
       12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings or
       Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: Londoner
       Date: October 27, 2023, 5:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       I received this PCN on Sunday for parking in a CPZ without a
       valid resident's permit.
       I live in the borough of Barnet where there are CPZs galore.
       Never have I come across restricted road parking without some
       sort of road markings (i.e painted bays) or signage within view
       of the parking space.
       Considering the above, and the fact that I have parked here in
       the past without issue, I had no idea I was parking in a
       restricted area.
       Having searched around on GSV I found that the council's image
       showing CPZ signage is around the corner. Is that really
       sufficient?
       Have I got an argument to make that there was no indication
       whatsoever of parking restrictions within view of where I
       parked?
       Thanks in advance for your help!
       GSV of "assumed" CPZ signage:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/aAvBUfHw73dtHDJR9
       GSV of parking location:
  HTML https://maps.app.goo.gl/Wg3Sb6ydPhHXzEer8
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/MVf7ghR/PXL-20231024-160050921-2.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/Ltr10PC
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/rk2qbYp/PXL-20231024-160220691.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/9nHBw64
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/f97s97X/Media.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/f97s97X
       
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/qdMCtL1/Media-2.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/qdMCtL1
       
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/bB1hzQb/Media-1.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/bB1hzQb
       
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/HB1MtRR/Media-3.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/HB1MtRR
       
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/wBnWhwH/Media-6.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/wBnWhwH
       
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/qDjHvS4/Media-5.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/qDjHvS4
       
  HTML https://i.ibb.co/phBrxGG/Media-4.jpg
  HTML https://ibb.co/phBrxGG
       #Post#: 8516--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: DancingDad
       Date: October 27, 2023, 6:29 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not a CPZ, an RPZ...Restricted Parking Zone ... really are the
       invention of the devil.
       They specifically must have entry signs like the one the CEo
       pics show and cannot have any of the normal road markings such
       as yellow lines.
       I would normally expect repeater signs in larger zones but not
       mandatory.
       It comes down to whether or not an adjudicator can be persuaded
       that the sign (there seems only one) complies with the regs that
       require signs to adequately convey the restriction... I'm 50/50
       on that one
       See what others have to say, they may know summat I don't for
       this area
       #Post#: 8519--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: October 27, 2023, 7:37 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Google Street View latest is 2015, which is, I suspect, too old
       to show the signs. So if you want to fight this one, you'll need
       to go and take your own photos. Much depends on where the entry
       sign is located, but from the look of the location, I suspect
       the whole of this development, called Britannia Village, is an
       RPZ, or has some pretty tight parking restrictions. I say this
       because the DLR station West Silvertown is quite close.
       #Post#: 8528--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: Londoner
       Date: October 27, 2023, 9:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: Incandescent link ---
       >
       > Google Street View latest is 2015, which is, I suspect, too
       old to show the signs. So if you want to fight this one, you'll
       need to go and take your own photos. Much depends on where the
       entry sign is located, but from the look of the location, I
       suspect the whole of this development, called Britannia Village,
       is an RPZ, or has some pretty tight parking restrictions. I say
       this because the DLR station West Silvertown is quite close.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I did take my own photos of where I parked, showing there were
       no road signs within view of the car, if that helps?
       #Post#: 8572--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: Enceladus
       Date: October 28, 2023, 6:48 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       These signs occur in all of the Newham Resident Parking Zones.
       They use them when there is only one entrance/exit into a street
       or set of streets. EG a cul-de-sac. The signs will be placed at
       the entrance and it's not possible to access such streets
       without passing the signs. There won't be any repeater signs.
       The restricted hours are on the signs and are the same as the
       parent zone, in this case Royal Docks West (RDW).
       #Post#: 8652--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 29, 2023, 9:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: DancingDad link ---
       >
       > Not a CPZ, an RPZ...Restricted Parking Zone ... really are the
       invention of the devil.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Not quite, it's a permit parking area or PPA, which is not the
       same as an RPZ.
       [member=702]Londoner[/member] please give us the PCN number and
       number plate.
       #Post#: 8658--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: Londoner
       Date: October 29, 2023, 10:51 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       > [quote author=DancingDad link=topic=804.msg8516#msg8516
       date=1698406175]
       > Not a CPZ, an RPZ...Restricted Parking Zone ... really are the
       invention of the devil.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       Not quite, it's a permit parking area or PPA, which is not the
       same as an RPZ.
       [member=702]Londoner[/member] please give us the PCN number and
       number plate.
       [/quote]
       PN 3 7 0 2 2 7 3 4
       Bravo.Kilo.One.Seven.Peter.Hotel.Universe
       #Post#: 8686--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 29, 2023, 4:06 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       These are the council photos:
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/A0WO2oY.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/UkM4zTP.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/UuBYpD5.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/uNh06CJ.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/f1YWNsl.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/ldY0AEH.jpg
  HTML https://i.imgur.com/1Fu7qJI.jpg
       I've requested the traffic order, in the meantime are you in a
       position to go back and check the signage? It would be helpful
       to know if there are any repeater signs within the zone. We have
       won cases in the past where a zone has a number of streets and
       no repeaters, though I have to say this one isn't very big.
       #Post#: 8689--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: Londoner
       Date: October 29, 2023, 4:15 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       --- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
       >
       >
       > I've requested the traffic order, in the meantime are you in a
       position to go back and check the signage? It would be helpful
       to know if there are any repeater signs within the zone. We have
       won cases in the past where a zone has a number of streets and
       no repeaters, though I have to say this one isn't very big.
       >
       --- End Quote ---
       I am confident there were no repeater signs as I checked upon
       leaving.  The signs that are in the council photos I must have
       missed as they were facing the other way when I drove past them
       (although it is clear to see from GSV the location they are in).
       It would be half hour drive in each direction for me to return
       to that location, which I'd rather avoid doing.
       #Post#: 8698--------------------------------------------------
       Re: 12 - Newham - Parked Without Valid Permit - No Road Markings
       or Signage in Sight. 
   DIR By: ivanleo
       Date: October 29, 2023, 5:10 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       These are the permit parking area cases I have to hand:
       Stephanie Martin v Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
       (KI00006-1905, 21 June 2019)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1CA19mTqe16e61jpg9iEhG7QXBxfiBpSW
       Shetal Patel v London Borough of Harrow (2220650316, 27 October
       2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1xZjjLoGbTaLsTaDBgOacE5uTukj4_c3x
       Sabera Lee v London Borough of Harrow (2220689923, 04 November
       2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1gWhzGqcAd9WIqwDkOROD2cegF_0lGFYE
       Ameeta Kumar v London Borough of Harrow (2220814027, 17 December
       2022)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=1z6ReY9ibyKmyVIj1h8PTWK3Jd8engSoV
       John Fellows v London Borough of Harrow (2230367923, 18
       September 2023)
  HTML https://drive.google.com/uc?id=14CwDmqKYLw-b-fvuPhqxTuxdsnJ3auo9
       In essence, the argument to be made is that a single sign at the
       entrance to the zone is inadequate, and the council should have
       provided repeaters. Try drafting a representation based on those
       decisions and post it on here and we'll tidy it up for you.
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 4
   DIR Next Page