DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 92353--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group nexus-parking charge-never entered any carpark
   DIR By: b789
       Date: October 1, 2025, 9:11 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You can use a single point POPLA appeal for this. Personally, I
       would send a snot-o-gram to the intellectually malnourished
       morons at GroupNexus as follows:
       --- Quote ---
       > Dear GroupNexus,
       >
       > Thank you for your generic rejection letter. I see that, once
       again, you have entirely side-stepped the single and fatal issue
       I raised.
       >
       > Your Notice to Keeper does not comply with Schedule 4 of the
       Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. You chose not to issue a fully
       PoFA-compliant notice and it is now too late for you to do so.
       This means you cannot hold me, the registered keeper, liable for
       the charge.
       >
       > You may shout about signage until you are blue in the face,
       but the law is quite clear: unless you comply with PoFA, only
       the driver can ever be liable. The driver has not been
       identified and will not be. Your entire position is therefore
       nothing more than a hollow attempt at extortion.
       >
       > If you genuinely believe in your case, by all means waste your
       money at POPLA. My appeal will be very short: No keeper
       liability. Driver not identified. End of matter.
       >
       > Please stop insulting my intelligence with boilerplate waffle
       about “BPA compliance.” The BPA Code of Practice does not
       override statute.
       >
       > I await your operator response pack after I submit my POPLA
       appeal, so that I can again highlight your incompetence and
       inability to comprehend the law, assuming you do not concede at
       that point.
       >
       > Yours sincerely,
       >
       > [Name]
       --- End Quote ---
       As for your POPA appeal, you only need to point out to the
       assessor two points why there can be no Keeper liability. You
       can use the following single point appeal:
       --- Quote ---
       > PoFA says the notice must clearly tell me who the “creditor”
       is. That means the exact legal person who says I owe the money.
       >
       > This notice uses the GroupNexus brand on top, but the small
       print says CP Plus Limited “trading as” GroupNexus. Those are
       not the same thing as one clear creditor. They are two different
       companies with different numbers at Companies House:
       >
       > [indent]• GROUPNEXUS LIMITED — company no. 15560549
       (incorporated 13 March 2024).
       > • CP PLUS LIMITED — company no. 02595379 (incorporated 26
       March 1991).[/indent]
       >
       > By the date of the alleged event (shown on the NtK as
       21/08/2025), GroupNexus Limited already existed as a separate
       legal entity. Saying “CP Plus Ltd t/a GroupNexus” does not
       identify whether the creditor is (a) CP Plus Limited, or (b)
       GroupNexus Limited, or (c) some brand name with no legal
       personality. PoFA requires one clear creditor, not a brand badge
       and a different company in the footer.
       >
       > Because the notice does not identify the creditor as required
       by PoFA 9(2)(h), keeper liability cannot arise. The operator
       also still fails PoFA for:
       >
       > [indent]• No PoFA invitation [9(2)(e)(i)] — it doesn’t state
       they don’t know the driver’s name/address for service and invite
       the keeper to pay or name the driver.
       > • No keeper-liability warning [9(2)(f)] — it doesn’t warn that
       after 28 days from the date the notice is 'given', if unpaid and
       they still don’t know the driver’s details, they have the right
       to recover the charge from the keeper.[/indent]
       >
       > In the simplest possible terms: the NtK must say exactly who
       wants the money and follow every PoFA rule. It doesn’t. The
       driver is not identified. So the keeper cannot be made to pay.
       The appeal must be allowed.
       --- End Quote ---
       #Post#: 92384--------------------------------------------------
       Re: Group nexus-parking charge-never entered any carpark
   DIR By: Mrcoreyd
       Date: October 1, 2025, 10:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you very much, both will be submitted tonight. I'll update
       with any responses I get
       *****************************************************
       Page 2 of 2
   DIR Previous Page