DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 88593--------------------------------------------------
Havering and Newham PCNs
DIR By: billybob47
Date: September 5, 2025, 11:38 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi guys,
Posting on behalf of a friend here, who was not the driver.
The driver has received 2 moving traffic PCNs, one from havering
and one from Newham. I thought collating them into one post
would be better for clutter reasons.
Both look pretty BTR to me, but maybe one of you know any
loophole that could be used to get them cancelled?
Images here on Imgur
HTML https://imgur.com/a/e1PHIce
(embed wasn’t working)
#Post#: 88622--------------------------------------------------
Re: Havering and Newham PCNs
DIR By: stamfordman
Date: September 5, 2025, 6:08 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
We prefer one case per thread but have a check on the tribunal
for cases at the locations first for any allowed cases.
There are two main ideas - the contravention (such as poor
signage) and PCN/website wording issues common to other PCNs.
Havering does not reoffer the discount on rejection, which is a
factor to consider.
#Post#: 88627--------------------------------------------------
Re: Havering and Newham PCNs
DIR By: Enceladus
Date: September 5, 2025, 10:51 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
The Newham video shows the car sailing past the two flying
motorcycle signs on the corners of Ordnance Road at its junction
with Malmesbury Road and the turn right only arrow (into
Malmesbury Rd). Since the camera is situated in front of the car
you can only see the backs of the signs on one side. The signs
on the other side are hidden from the camera by the scaffolding,
but visibility is unobstructed in the direction you were
travelling.
This seems to be a temporary prohibition to facilitate various
building works in the area and it was introduced 2-3 months ago.
I'm not sure if any cases have reached the Tribunal yet.
Newham will usually reoffer the discount if representations
received within the discount window is rejected. So it's always
worth having a go.
*****************************************************
Page 1 of 1