URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 88521--------------------------------------------------
       London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: Hashim
       Date: September 5, 2025, 5:57 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good morning.
       This came through today which shows the driver entering and
       stopping in the junction box.
       I've seen the footage which does not show the traffic lights
       being green at the time of the alleged offence and the vehicle
       in front did not move causing the driver to stop in the box.
       Is there a successful appeal here.
       Thanks in advance once again.
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/RPpiTHV
       Ps. Its not allowing ne to attach the documents.
       Hashim
       #Post#: 88523--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: DWMB2
       Date: September 5, 2025, 6:07 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       This is a council PCN so I have moved this post to the Civil
       penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so on)
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/<br
       />forum.
       To help the users there provide you with the best advice, please
       read the following thread carefully and provide as much of the
       information it requests as you are able to: READ THIS FIRST -
       **BEFORE POSTING YOUR CASE!**, This section is for council, TFL,
       Dart/Mersey/Tyne etc. cases
  HTML https://www.ftla.uk/civil-penalty-charge-notices-(councils-tfl-and-so-on)/read-this-first-before-posting-your-case!-this-section-is-for-council-tfl-dartme/<br
       />
       #Post#: 88710--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: Hippocrates
       Date: September 6, 2025, 3:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I make this collateral challenge against the validity of the PCN
       as it is missing
       mandatory information as provided at Para. 4 (8 ) (v) of
  HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted
       (v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the
       28 day period, an
       increased charge may be payable.
       Clearly, this refers to Para. 4 (8 ) (iii):
       (iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the
       period of 28 days
       beginning with the date of the notice;
       Therefore, it follows that the statement: "If you fail to pay
       the Penalty Charge or make
       representations before the end of a period of 28 days beginning
       with the date of service
       of this notice an increased charge of £240 may be payable” adds
       to the lack of clarity by
       its omission. Even on its own, whether the required information
       was included or not, it is
       also arguable that it conflates the two periods using the word
       "or" which many would
       view as being conjunctive. Furthermore, even if the statement
       were to be interpreted
       disjunctively, there is still no clarity due to the missing
       information. So, it follows that it
       cannot possibly be interpreted disjunctively.
       Please cancel therefore.
       #Post#: 88789--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: Hashim
       Date: September 7, 2025, 10:28 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you.
       I shall put this forward.
       Thanks
       Hashim
       #Post#: 91984--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: Hashim
       Date: September 29, 2025, 7:44 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Good afternoon
       I have received The Notice of Rejection of representation.
       Please see
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/DRdfqKa
       What's next please.....
       Thanks
       Hashim
       #Post#: 92064--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: September 29, 2025, 1:23 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       What a load of tosh their letter is.  The contravention of
       stopping in a box junction is only made out, if the vehicle
       stops in the box due to the presence of stationary vehicles. A
       stop for anything else is not a contravention. The Highway Code
       guff on YBJs is a gross simplification, and is also not law.
       #Post#: 92071--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: Hashim
       Date: September 29, 2025, 1:42 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       so what's the play now...
       #Post#: 92084--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: fraser.mitchell
       Date: September 29, 2025, 2:16 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Having looked at the video, it shows a clear contravention. You
       followed a car in front with no hesitation, and there was not
       sufficient space to take the whole of your vehicle, so the rear
       wheels stay in the box for over 7 seconds when the video stops,
       and your car is still in the box then.
       So it is something of a gamble, if you want to take them to
       London Tribunals on Hippocrates suggested "technical" appeal.
       Technical appeals are not related to the contravention in any
       way, but on council mismanagement of the enforcement process.
       Of course it may well win, so I suggest you PM Hippocrates to
       ask what the odds of success are. Appeals like this have won in
       the past. Of course the full PCN penalty will be in play if you
       go to London Tribunals.
       #Post#: 92290--------------------------------------------------
       Re: London Borough of Redbridge code 31j
   DIR By: Hashim
       Date: October 1, 2025, 4:38 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hippocrates
       I am unable to send you the thread privately (not tech Savvy) so
       i am posting here.
       The Council refused the initial appeal.
       Based on your expertise is it worth taking it to the Tribunal
       based on technicality as oppose to the actual offence.
       Thanks
       Hashim
       *****************************************************
       Page 1 of 1