DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: The Flame Pit
*****************************************************
#Post#: 88667--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: Hippocrates Date: September 6, 2025, 9:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
From the other thread:
HTML https://t.co/Xx9WebQYix
HTML https://youtu.be/HZRybHyQ91I
I now name the people I have given 7 days to apologise from the
top down:
Councillor Nicola Nardelli; Matthew Hill; Gareth Campbell; Macy
Briggs.
After all, this is how they treat motorists. Now the boot is on
the other foot. I expect they will all blame APCOA. Let's pass
the buck.
#Post#: 88721--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: Hippocrates Date: September 6, 2025, 5:20 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=1]cp8759[/member] Said provocateur is a combination of
an idiot and a troll. Maxim: When it hits the fan, find a big
shower.
[member=6744]Rogersmith1977[/member]
Video to follow tomorrow.
Excellent. 9 guests viewing.
Sarah Ireland should resign and/or apologise too. How much does
she earn? She is the conductor of this motley crew. Andreas
Kirsch is the leader. I have written to him on several
occasions. He hasn't even had the courtesy to reply. At least
King Kev of the former Tory bunch did so. Ed Davey's wife is
part of all this too.
Come on RBK: take me to court as per @Rogersmith1977 suggests.
The previous manager A H Roelefeld did understand statutory
dates re the Bus Lane PCNs. She was Gareth Campbell's mentor,
apparently, for whom he had the greatest regard. And he used to
describe himself as the nemesis of "persistent offenders". Pot
calls kettle black. Linkedin posts now removed.
HTML https://youtu.be/Izq6v54bEwk
HTML https://youtu.be/ny8WWLNe3gw
HTML https://youtu.be/u70AcJfP7IY
#Post#: 88739--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: sledge1uk Date: September 7, 2025, 4:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Roger the Dodger
I am somewhat dumbfounded by you starting this post
According to your stance on public servants having any validity,
I am surprised your Civil Rights Lawyer PM is not himself
pursuing endless cases against all the media and endless public
posts for Defamation, data protection and harassment as he is in
total denial to all the claims against him.
1. Defamation (Defamation Act 2013): The statements made are
false and have the potential to cause serious harm to the named
person’s reputation, particularly in relation to the employment.
This constitutes defamatory material.
2. Data Protection and UK GDPR (Data Protection Act 2018): The
publication of the persons’s full name without consent amounts
to unlawful processing of personal data. There is no lawful
basis for the disclosure of such data in this context. - irony
at its finest that one
3. Harassment (Protection from Harassment Act 1997): Publicly
targeting an individual in this manner way could amount to a
harassment investigation which is recognised as both a civil
wrong and a criminal offence.
Pity you don't put your energy to shake up your PCN Micky Mouse
cowboy council employees and get them to act in a honest and
professional manner as this Kingston bus lane is still ongoing
years later. Your Council were fully aware of the missing
signage due to road works but still issued PCN and have never
had the common decency to make a refund which is obtaining money
under misspresentaion which is a criminal offence and action
should have been taken against them.
From: **** <hotmail.com>
Sent: 09 November 2023 19:21
To: parkingservicesteam@kingston.gov.uk
<parkingservicesteam@kingston.gov.uk>; foi@kingston.gov.uk
<foi@kingston.gov.uk>
Cc:
Subject: Fw: Failure to respond on my 16 Sept 2023 Complaint and
FOI request where the later has been acknowledged but still
outstanding
REMINDER
Dear Sarah Ireland
Your Council is not fit for purpose and a total disgrace with
your inaction to my 16 Sept 2023 e mail below so now add
this Council zero response to the list of complaints where you
need to be taken to task. I have included all Councillor's so
they are fully aware of the Councils inability to perform so
copy them in with your reply.
1). FOI as outlined in in my 16 Sept 2023 e mail still not
forthcoming where it was stated on 20 Oct 2023 it would be
available by 27 October 2023
2). Provide answers to Kingston Councils staff incompetence,
harassment and deception by extorting public money under false
presences . The full outcome with clear explanation of your
Council's investigation is required and what disciplinary action
is being taken by these councils perpetrators.
3). Please add to my FOI list how many non compliant PCN you
have issued since 16 September 2023 during this Council inaction
period to date and what corrective action you will be taking
with these extorted illegal proceeds.
Regards
From: P
Sent: 16 September 2023 11:24
To: cmt@kingston.gov.uk <cmt@kingston.gov.uk>
Subject: PCN reference ***** date of notice 15/06/ 2023
Complaint
Dear Kingston Council
PCN reference ****** date of notice 15/06/ 2023 Complaint
SE07XKX
Can a single one of you Councillors, identify the "Authorised "
person who on 7 July 2028 signed off in reply to my initial
Challenge with a lengthy generic rejection letter clearly
demonstrating they had not read the challenge content resulting
it unnecessarily being taken to the next Enforcement Notice
stage wasting my time and ratepayers' money. I then receive this
Enforcement Notice dated 14 August 2028 and replied on the same
day with a single line simple challenge telling them to actually
read my initial representation which included the attached
photograph clearly showing there was NO WARNING or RESTRICTION
on turning left from Union St into Eden St.
Accordingly, please investigate this matter and submit clear
substantiation of what further evidence this same author
established that had not already been provided to now waive the
PCN as stated on the Council 11 September 2023 response. I,
along with many others are intrigued as to what changed that
authors mind and if there are no valid grounds, this author
needs to be taken to task and removed from this post and
downgraded to something requiring limited skills for the benefit
of all ratepayers funding your Council.
Moreover, I do not believe this to be an isolated case which
demonstrates that your staff are unskilled, not fit for purpose
sending out generic rejections not reading the challenge or
incapable of comprehending that your Eden St Bus lane PCN is
non-compliant . Had that authorised member of staff bothered to
read my initial representation months back which basically
informed your Council they were issuing non-valid PCN.
On the other side of the coin, if Kingston Council is knowingly
issuing PCN that are non-compliant this is considered an abuse
of power, fraud and blatant entrapment purely for financial gain
by extorting money from the public knowing the vast majority
simply pay the reduced PCN amount to move on. Those that
Challenge the PCN and get that Councils Generic response is
considered further harassment and this practice must cease.
I trust I will receive a proactive response to these issues
raised to avoid escalating this to a higher authority.
Accordingly, under the Freedom of Information act, please advise
re the attached Google Earth map clearly showing there is NO
sign on Union St informing drivers they are not permitted to
turn left and enter Eden Street bus lane.
a).. The date the Council
i). Became aware there was no sign in place not to turn left.
ii). Were made aware themselves or by third parties there was no
sign not to turn left
iii). Installed the conforming sign not to turn left as it was a
bus lane.
Please Quantify for each of the 3 periods in a). above the
following.
b). how many members of public challenged the Eden st Bus lane
PCN during this period and
Quantity of PCN issued
Quantity that were challenged
Quantity rejected
Quantity that were sent enforcement Notices
Quantity that were further challenged and subsequently waived
like mine
Quantity that were rejected and went to Tribunal.
Quantity won at Tribunal
Once these figures are established, please clearly explain the
means of reimbursement for all those who paid any non-compliant
PCNs.
On a more serious issue, as I suspect from my case this is not
isolated and Kingston Council intentionally reject all initial
challenges to a PCN. Accordingly, under the FOI, please also
submit the following.
c). Total quantity of "ALL" PCN's Issued by Kingston Council
over the last year to this date.
Quantity of PCN issued
Quantity that were challenged
Quantity rejected
Quantity that were sent enforcement Notices
Quantity that were further challenged and subsequently waived
like mine
Quantity that were rejected and went to Tribunal.
Quantity won at Tribunal
Regards
#Post#: 88788--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: ivanleo Date: September 7, 2025, 10:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Naming is fine but no doxing please.
#Post#: 88893--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: Hippocrates Date: September 8, 2025, 4:39 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=1]cp8759[/member] All councillors have their e mail
addresses openly published on the council's website. ;) And
their phone numbers, too.
I will publish another video shot yesterday - if I can hobble
upstairs! :'(
#Post#: 88922--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: ivanleo Date: September 8, 2025, 7:28 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=7928.msg88893#msg88893
date=1757324387]
[member=1]cp8759[/member] All councillors have their e mail
addresses openly published on the council's website. ;) And
their phone numbers, too.
[/quote]
Yes but I don't have time to check 100+ email addresses and
check if they all belong to elected councillors.
#Post#: 88929--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: Hippocrates Date: September 8, 2025, 7:47 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[quote author=cp8759 link=topic=7928.msg88922#msg88922
date=1757334509]
[quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=7928.msg88893#msg88893
date=1757324387]
[member=1]cp8759[/member] All councillors have their e mail
addresses openly published on the council's website. ;) And
their phone numbers, too.
[/quote]
Yes but I don't have time to check 100+ email addresses and
check if they all belong to elected councillors.
[/quote]
;D
#Post#: 88930--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: Hippocrates Date: September 8, 2025, 7:48 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile, as promised, sciatica or not:
HTML https://youtu.be/k0fk8XK1Uj4
Actually, the plan was deliberately adduced!:
We have also provided a diagram to explain the size of the box
junction.
HTML https://youtu.be/nCyXTwqoJrk
#Post#: 89669--------------------------------------------------
Re: Kingston opon Thames - 31J yellow box - Kingston Road
By: Hippocrates Date: September 12, 2025, 9:10 am
---------------------------------------------------------
[member=6744]Rogersmith1977[/member]
HTML https://t.co/dfeu6Cj3z1
*****************************************************
DIR Next Page