URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 113013--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 12, 2026, 11:02 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       It looks like the original Judgement has now been set-aside.
       But you need to now file your defence for the original claim.
       #Post#: 113019--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 12, 2026, 11:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you for your prompt response. Does it mean that I don’t
       have to attend the hearing in person on Monday and also where
       and how do I file my defence for the original claim?
       #Post#: 113036--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 12, 2026, 12:18 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Do you have details to log into MCOL?
       #Post#: 113040--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 12, 2026, 1:02 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Yes, I do. But when I search for the claim on there is asking
       for defence pack password which I don’t have. Thanks
       #Post#: 113430--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 16, 2026, 12:57 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi all,
       Thank you all for your help. I have today attended the hearing
       and the judge has granted the set aside and the registration has
       been cancelled. The judge told me to file my defence to the
       court and send a copy to the claimant within 14 days from today.
       I have drafted my defence and will be grateful if someone can
       look through to see if it’s all okay to send. Please see the
       link below for my defence. Thanks
  HTML https://ibb.co/9H0rHyy9
       #Post#: 113772--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 19, 2026, 4:52 pm
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Apologies I posted the defence summary with a link, please see
       below for ease. Thank you. I used ChatGPT for this
       1. The Defendant denies that the Claimant is entitled to the
       relief claimed or at all.
       2. The Particulars of Claim are vague and fail to provide
       sufficient detail of the alleged breach, the contractual terms
       relied upon, or how the sum of £170 has been calculated. The
       Defendant is therefore unable to fully understand the case
       against them.
       3. The Defendant parked in a marked disabled bay due to
       disability and reasonable need. The Defendant reasonably
       believed that parking in the disabled bay was permitted and
       necessary.
       4. The Claimant is put to strict proof that the signage at the
       site clearly communicated the alleged requirement for a “valid
       parking reservation” in relation to disabled bays. The Defendant
       does not recall any clear signage indicating that disabled bay
       users were required to make such a reservation.
       5. The Defendant avers that any signage present was
       insufficiently prominent, unclear, or incapable of forming a
       legally binding contract with the driver.
       6. Further, under the provisions of the Equality Act 2010,
       service providers must make reasonable adjustments for disabled
       persons. The issuing of a parking charge in circumstances where
       a disabled person reasonably used a disabled bay may amount to a
       failure to make such reasonable adjustments.
       7. The Defendant further denies that the Claimant has suffered
       any loss or damage and disputes that the additional sums added
       to the original charge represent legitimate or recoverable
       costs.
       8. The Defendant also disputes the added sum above the initial
       parking charge, which appears to be an attempt at double
       recovery and is unsupported by law.
       9. For the reasons stated above, the Defendant respectfully
       requests that the claim be dismissed.
       10. Statement of Truth
       11. I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true.
       12. Signed: ___________________
       13. Name: ___________________
       14. Date: ___________________
       #Post#: 113790--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: InterCity125 Date: March 20, 2026, 2:20 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Any chance you could post up the original PCN?
       I cannot get the previous one to load.
       #Post#: 113818--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 20, 2026, 6:54 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       I don’t have the original PCN but here’s the PoC I received from
       the CNBC
  HTML https://ibb.co/sd8dbS7b
  HTML https://ibb.co/gL1N553q
       Please see also DCB legal submissions to the court which they
       emailed a copy to me
  HTML https://ibb.co/MynG8qR7
       Thank you
       #Post#: 114311--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 25, 2026, 3:13 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi, apologies this is the original PCN received via email from
       DCB LEGAL. Please see the link. Thanks
  HTML https://ibb.co/8Ls4mhzP
  HTML https://ibb.co/k6120RcL
       #Post#: 114431--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: March 26, 2026, 3:25 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Hi,
       Can someone check my defence please if it’s ok to send it. I
       need to file my defence by Monday 30th March. I have posted the
       original PCN here as requested. I have posted my defence twice
       here but please see it below for ease. Thank you.
       1. The Defendant denies that the Claimant is entitled to the
       relief claimed or at all.
       2. The Particulars of Claim are vague and fail to provide
       sufficient detail of the alleged breach, the contractual terms
       relied upon, or how the sum of £170 has been calculated. The
       Defendant is therefore unable to fully understand the case
       against them.
       3. The Defendant parked in a marked disabled bay due to
       disability and reasonable need. The Defendant reasonably
       believed that parking in the disabled bay was permitted and
       necessary.
       4. The Claimant is put to strict proof that the signage at the
       site clearly communicated the alleged requirement for a “valid
       parking reservation” in relation to disabled bays. The Defendant
       does not recall any clear signage indicating that disabled bay
       users were required to make such a reservation.
       5. The Defendant avers that any signage present was
       insufficiently prominent, unclear, or incapable of forming a
       legally binding contract with the driver.
       6. Further, under the provisions of the Equality Act 2010,
       service providers must make reasonable adjustments for disabled
       persons. The issuing of a parking charge in circumstances where
       a disabled person reasonably used a disabled bay may amount to a
       failure to make such reasonable adjustments.
       7. The Defendant further denies that the Claimant has suffered
       any loss or damage and disputes that the additional sums added
       to the original charge represent legitimate or recoverable
       costs.
       8. The Defendant also disputes the added sum above the initial
       parking charge, which appears to be an attempt at double
       recovery and is unsupported by law.
       9. For the reasons stated above, the Defendant respectfully
       requests that the claim be dismissed.
       10. Statement of Truth
       11. I believe that the facts stated in this Defence are true.
       12. Signed: ___________________
       13. Name: ___________________
       14. Date: ___________________
       *****************************************************
   DIR Previous Page
   DIR Next Page