DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 88357--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: September 4, 2025, 6:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you - all sent off, just need to call CNBC to make payment
for the fees. Thank you for all your help really appreciate it.
I will come back with an update when I get a response.
#Post#: 91928--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: September 29, 2025, 5:00 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I have received a reply to the SAR from the DPO at DCB Legal,
and based on the information and having seen the original PCN, I
remember parking in a disabled bay and displaying my blue badge.
I haven't heard from CNBC yet after paying the fees for the
set-aside. I will call tomorrow to follow up.
#Post#: 91954--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: b789 Date: September 29, 2025, 6:01 am
---------------------------------------------------------
There has been a very recent High Court appeal case that will
have ramifications for the claimant and their legal
representative. To understand better, you may want to read this
thread:
Why the recent High Court appellate case of Mazur is very
relevant to all cases we deal with here
HTML https://www.ftla.uk/private-parking-tickets/why-the-recent-high-court-appellate-case-of-mazur-is-very-relevant-to-all-cases-/
Based on the SAR you have received, can you identify every
person that has signed any document you received after the date
of the initial claim? If so, does that document also make clear
their position within the company (solicitor, paralegal,
assistant etc.)?
If you are not sure, you need to send a warning shot across the
bows of DCB Legal that you believe that persons unauthorised to
conduct litigation have being doing so in your case and you
require verification of every person that has signed any
document is permitted to do so under the Legal Services Act
2007.
Conducting litigation when not authorised is a criminal offence
and must be reported to the SRA. I will hazard a guess that the
original PoC were signed by Sarah Ensall who is NOT authorised
to conduct litigation. When you obtained the details of the PoC,
did they tell you the name of the person who signed them?
#Post#: 91966--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: September 29, 2025, 6:49 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Based on the SAR you have received, can you identify every
person that has signed any document you received after the date
of the initial claim? If so, does that document also make clear
their position within the company (solicitor, paralegal,
assistant etc.)? NO, the documents they send are the PCN and
certificate of postage which says it was sent via hybrid mail.
If you are not sure, you need to send a warning shot across the
bows of DCB Legal that you believe that persons unauthorised to
conduct litigation have being doing so in your case and you
require verification of every person that has signed any
document is permitted to do so under the Legal Services Act
2007. ok, will do how do I go about that please?
Conducting litigation when not authorised is a criminal offence
and must be reported to the SRA. I will hazard a guess that the
original PoC were signed by Sarah Ensall who is NOT authorised
to conduct litigation. When you obtained the details of the PoC,
did they tell you the name of the person who signed them? No
signature of that either. you are correct, it is criminal, they
have disabled bays there and the PCN is based on a camera whilst
entering and leaving.
Link to PoC received from CNBC
HTML https://imgur.com/a/kZTUHFf
#Post#: 91993--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: b789 Date: September 29, 2025, 8:15 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Send the following by email to info@dcblegal.co.uk and CC
yourself:
[quote]Subject: Claim [Court ref] — Request for copy N1 and
confirmation of signatory’s authorisation
Dear Sirs,
I am the Defendant (litigant in person). Following notice of a
CCJ in default, I received the Particulars of Claim from the
Civil National Business Centre by email on [date], but I have
never been provided with the N1 (claim form) for this matter.
Please provide, within 7 days:
[indent]1. A copy of the N1 claim form, including the statement
of truth and signature block.
2. The name, role, and authorisation basis of the individual who
signed/verified the N1 and/or Particulars of Claim, together
with confirmation that they were authorised to conduct
litigation for the purposes of the Legal Services Act 2007 at
the time. If you say they were authorised, please identify the
statutory/regulatory basis (e.g. practising
certificate/authorisation number).
3. If the N1/PoC were signed by Ms Sarah Ensall, please confirm
whether she is an authorised person with a right to conduct
litigation. Conduct of litigation is a reserved legal activity
under the LSA 2007. Recent binding High Court authority confirms
that unauthorised individuals may not conduct litigation, even
under supervision.[/indent]
If you cannot provide satisfactory evidence that the claim was
issued and verified by an authorised person, I will place this
correspondence before the court at the set-aside hearing, invite
the court to disallow any fixed costs included in the default
judgment, and seek my own application costs. I also reserve the
right to report this to the SRA as a potential breach of the LSA
2007 and the SRA Principles.
Please confirm receipt and provide the requested material within
7 days.
Without prejudice to my primary position, given that my N244 has
already been filed and no fee has yet been requested by the
CNBC, please confirm by return that you consent to the set-aside
of the default judgment at your client’s cost and will (i)
file/agree a consent order for the judgment to be set aside on
the papers, (ii) ask the court to process the order without
requiring my fee, or, if the court nevertheless requests
payment, (iii) reimburse me in full immediately on proof of
payment. Please also confirm that enforcement is stayed pending
disposal of the set-aside.
If you decline to proceed by consent on the above basis, I will
place this letter before the court on costs. Your refusal to
agree a cheaper, quicker route will be relied on when I invite
the court to make an adverse costs order.
Yours faithfully,
[Full name]
[Postal address]
[Email][/quote]
#Post#: 92033--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: September 29, 2025, 10:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you very much, I will send this straight away. I have a
question, though. Could you please clarify the statement below,
as I have already paid for the set aside? Thank you.
Without prejudice to my primary position, given that my N244 has
already been filed and no fee has yet been requested by the
CNBC,
#Post#: 92036--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: b789 Date: September 29, 2025, 11:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Have you paid for the N244 application already? If so, then you
need to change that paragraph to:
[quote]Without prejudice to my primary position, given that my
N244 has already been filed and the court fee has been paid,
please confirm by return that you consent to the set-aside of
the default judgment at your client’s cost and will (i)
file/agree a consent order for the judgment to be set aside on
the papers, (ii) request that the court deals with the order
without a hearing, and (iii) reimburse my N244 fee in full upon
confirmation of the order. Please also confirm that enforcement
is stayed pending disposal of the set-aside.[/quote]
#Post#: 92044--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: September 29, 2025, 11:53 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, I have, thank you. I will use this.
#Post#: 104755--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: January 6, 2026, 7:59 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
Happy New Year. I have today received the hearing date for the
set‑aside application, which is scheduled to take place in
March. I did not receive any response from DCB Legal to the
letter I sent requesting confirmation of signatory
authorisation.
My question is: what evidence will I need to present to the
court at the hearing? Many Thanks.
#Post#: 113011--------------------------------------------------
Re: received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
im Form:
By: abena0277 Date: March 12, 2026, 10:50 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi all,
I have the hearing for the set aside in person on Monday 16
March. I have today received this letter from DCB legal via
email
HTML https://ibb.co/YTdBLNSh
Please could someone explain what this means? Thank you.
*****************************************************
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page