URI:
   DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
  HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       *****************************************************
   DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
       *****************************************************
       #Post#: 88222--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: b789 Date: September 3, 2025, 5:36 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       For Q5, you should definitely request a hearing. Do not agree to
       it being decided on the papers. At a hearing, you’ll have the
       chance to explain directly to the judge what has happened. In
       many cases the claimant doesn’t bother to attend, so you may
       have the judge’s full attention without challenge.
       Regarding evidence of postal problems, anything you can show is
       useful, even if it’s just a transcript of previous interactions
       about missing post. It helps to show a consistent pattern.
       Remember that the presumption of delivery of both the Letter of
       Claim and the claim form can be rebutted. Under the
       Interpretation Act 1978, once you state you never received them,
       the burden shifts back. The claimant must then show proof of
       posting, and the court service centre (CNBC) must do the same
       for the claim form. Neither DCB Legal nor CNBC use recorded
       delivery, so they cannot rely on “proof of delivery” — they must
       be able to produce proof of posting.
       Have you contacted the CNBC yet? You should ask them for a copy
       of the Particulars of Claim and the issue date of the claim. At
       the same time, tell them that you never received the claim form
       and that you are challenging the presumption of delivery. Make
       clear that you require proof of posting if they are to rely on
       it.
       Use something like this for your WS:
       [quote]In the County Court
       Claim number: [Claim number]
       Between ParkMaven Ltd (Claimant)
       and
       [Your full name] (Defendant)
       Witness Statement (supporting N244 application)
       1. I make this statement in support of my application to set
       aside the default judgment dated 20 August 2025.
       2. I did not receive a Letter of Claim from the claimant’s
       solicitors prior to proceedings being issued, nor did I receive
       the claim form from the court. I only became aware of the matter
       when I received the default judgment. I acted promptly in making
       this application once I became aware of it.
       3. I have experienced continuing issues with unreliable post at
       my address. I can provide evidence of missing or misdelivered
       items to demonstrate that postal service to my property has been
       erratic.
       4. The presumption of delivery under the Interpretation Act 1978
       is rebuttable. Having clearly stated that neither the Letter of
       Claim nor the claim form were received, the burden is on the
       claimant and the Civil National Business Centre to provide proof
       of posting if they seek to rely on that presumption. Neither
       uses recorded delivery, therefore they must be able to produce
       at least proof of posting.
       5. I have contacted the Civil National Business Centre to obtain
       a copy of the Particulars of Claim and the issue date. I have
       also put them on notice that I challenge the presumption of
       delivery and require proof of posting.
       6. A Subject Access Request was sent to the claimant’s
       solicitors on [insert date] requesting copies of the Letter of
       Claim and any proof of posting. They have 30 days to respond. At
       present I have no evidence that a Letter of Claim was ever
       served. I put the claimant to strict proof of service of both
       the Letter of Claim and the claim form.
       Real Prospect of Defence
       7. I also submit that I have a real prospect of successfully
       defending this claim should it proceed. I am a Blue Badge holder
       with protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010. If
       the claimant issued a Parking Charge Notice against my vehicle
       without making reasonable adjustments for my disability, then
       the charge is unlawful and unenforceable.
       8. I further believe the claimant’s signage and contractual
       terms will not withstand scrutiny. Based on my past experience
       with private parking operators, their notices often fail to
       comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012, and the amount
       claimed is likely to include sums that constitute an abuse of
       process. These are all valid grounds of defence that I intend to
       raise in full once the Particulars of Claim are disclosed.
       9. Accordingly, even if the court were to conclude that the
       claim form was served, there remains a good reason to set aside
       judgment under CPR 13.3, as I have a realistic and arguable
       defence and I acted promptly upon discovering the judgment.
       Costs
       10. I recognise that the service of the claim form is the
       responsibility of the Civil National Business Centre rather than
       the claimant. I therefore do not suggest that the claimant
       should be held responsible for any fault in that process.
       11. However, I did not receive a Letter of Claim from the
       claimant’s solicitors before proceedings were issued. This is a
       requirement of the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims. I have
       submitted a Subject Access Request to the claimant’s solicitors
       to obtain a copy of the Letter of Claim and proof of posting.
       Unless they can provide evidence that it was served, they will
       have failed to comply with the Protocol. In that case, I will
       ask the court to consider whether the £313 application fee
       should properly be borne by the claimant, as their failure to
       follow the required pre-action steps gave rise to unnecessary
       litigation.
       12. In addition, if the claimant chooses to discontinue the
       claim following set aside, I reserve the right to seek recovery
       of my £313 under CPR 38.6 and CPR 27.14(2)(g). To discontinue
       after forcing me to incur the costs of this application would
       amount to unreasonable conduct.
       Statement of Truth
       I believe that the facts stated in this witness statement are
       true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of court may be
       brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false
       statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without
       an honest belief in its truth.[/quote]
       Use the following as your draft order:
       [quote]Draft Order
       Upon the application of the Defendant dated [insert date], and
       upon reading the evidence filed, it is ordered that:
       [indent]1. The default judgment dated [insert date of judgment]
       be set aside pursuant to CPR 13.2 and/or CPR 13.3.
       2. The Claim is reinstated.
       3. The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order
       file and serve evidence of service of any Letter of Claim relied
       upon.
       4. The Defendant shall file and serve a Defence within 14 days
       after the Claimant has complied with paragraph 3, or within 14
       days of the court confirming that no such evidence is produced.
       5. The Claimant shall pay the Defendant’s costs of this
       application, being the £313 court fee, unless the court is
       satisfied that the default judgment arose solely due to a
       failure of service by the court.[/quote]
       #Post#: 88249--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: September 3, 2025, 7:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you, this is brilliant!!!
       I haven't contacted CNBC yet as I'm having trouble finding the
       correct email. I have looked in the Mailboxes doc in the 'Read
       This First' post, but I don't know which email I should send the
       request for the particulars of the claim and the issue date. Do
       you have an email, please? Or should I send it to the
       Applications.CNBC[member=6517]justice[/member].gov.uk?
       #Post#: 88251--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: jfollows Date: September 3, 2025, 7:19 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       You need to contact the County Court Bulk Centre on 01604 619
       400 selecting option 6 to speak to the customer helpdesk. They
       will ask you for the information regarding the claim, and then
       be able to provide you with further details about who the money
       is owed to.
  HTML https://www.moneyclaimsuk.co.uk/ccbc.aspx
       #Post#: 88258--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: b789 Date: September 3, 2025, 7:56 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Not sure that is the correct number. That is from the old CCBCn
       nit the CNBC. This the number that I know does work: 0300 123
       1056.
       It is best to call first thing in the morning, at 8:30 to avoid
       long waits.
       Whilst on the phone, ask them to email you the PoC and don’t
       hang up until you have received them. Also ask them who to
       contact for proof of posting of the claim as you are rebutting
       the presumption of delivery.
       #Post#: 88259--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: September 3, 2025, 8:03 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Ok, thank you - will do that first thing tomorrow morning.
       Please could you have a look at the SAR below if it's ok to
       send?
       I'm sending it to response@dcblegal.co.uk. This is their email I
       found online. Thanks
       Dear DCB Legal,
       I am writing to formally request a copy of the personal data you
       hold about me, which I am entitled to access under the Data
       Protection Act 2018. Specifically, I would like to obtain:
       A copy of the Letter of Claim (LoC)
       Proof of posting related to the LoC
       Please note that under data protection legislation, you are
       required to respond to this request within one calendar month of
       receipt.
       Kindly confirm that you have received and read this request.
       Yours sincerely,
       #Post#: 88317--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: b789 Date: September 4, 2025, 2:00 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       No. You need to be much more thorough and it needs to go
       directly to their DPO. So, address the following email to
       dpocontact@dcblegal.co.uk and you CC response@dcblegal.co.uk and
       also yourself:
       [quote]Subject Access Request – [Your Name] – [Claim or
       reference number: Reference Number]
       Dear Sir or Madam,
       I am writing to you as the data subject under Article 15 of the
       UK General Data Protection Regulation and the Data Protection
       Act 2018.
       Please supply the personal data you hold about me, which I am
       entitled to receive under data protection law. This includes,
       but is not limited to:
       [indent]1. A full copy of all personal data you hold about me in
       any form (electronic, paper, or otherwise), including
       correspondence, notes, logs, call recordings, and internal
       communications.
       2. Copies of all correspondence, notices, and letters you claim
       to have sent to me, including any Letter of Claim.
       3. Metadata and/or system notes showing the date each such
       document was generated and issued.
       4. Proof of posting for every item of correspondence sent to me,
       including the method of posting, date, and location. If you
       cannot provide proof of posting, please confirm this in writing.
       5. Copies of all data you have received from third parties (such
       as the parking company or their agents) relating to me.
       6. Records of any data sharing, including with the County Court
       Business Centre or the Claimant.
       7. The source of my personal data, if not collected directly
       from me.[/indent]
       Please also confirm:
       [indent]• The purposes for which you are processing my data.
       • The categories of personal data concerned.
       • The recipients or categories of recipient to whom my data has
       been or will be disclosed.
       • The envisaged retention period for my personal data.[/indent@]
       For the avoidance of doubt, I expressly rebut any presumption
       that a Letter of Claim was served on me. You are therefore put
       to strict proof that it was in fact posted. Proof of posting is
       required in order to rely on the presumption of delivery.
       This request is made in full knowledge that you have already
       used my personal data to allegedly issue a Letter of Claim,
       commence proceedings via the Civil National Business Centre, and
       obtain a default judgment. Accordingly, there can be no
       reasonable requirement for you to seek further identification
       before responding.
       Please treat this as a Subject Access Request. I require the
       information to be provided within one calendar month as required
       by law.
       Yours faithfully,
       [Your full name]
       [Your address]
       [Your reference/claim number][/quote]
       #Post#: 88322--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: September 4, 2025, 3:17 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Thank you I will send it straight away.
       I just had an interesting phone call with CNBC. Initially, they
       said they didn't have the PoC, but upon standing my ground, they
       sent it, so thank you for telling me not to get off the phone
       until it's emailed to me. I really appreciate it. They also said
       they don't have any proof of posting because they don't use
       recorded delivery and advised that I send the set aside to their
       applications email address.
       Here’s the link for the PoC
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/kZTUHFf
       #Post#: 88331--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: b789 Date: September 4, 2025, 4:15 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Of course they don’t use recorded delivery which means you can
       rebut their presumption of delivery by insisting on proof of
       posting. If they cannot evidence such proof, then, according to
       the Interpretation Act, delivery cannot be presumed and
       therefore, there is no evidence that the claim was ever served.
       Please show us the PoC.
       #Post#: 88344--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: abena0277 Date: September 4, 2025, 4:52 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       Link above but here it is, thank you
  HTML https://imgur.com/a/kZTUHFf
       #Post#: 88347--------------------------------------------------
       Re:  received a judgement in default but have not received a Cla
       im Form:
       By: b789 Date: September 4, 2025, 4:58 am
       ---------------------------------------------------------
       So it’s a typical DCB Legal issued claim. This means that once
       defended, they will eventually discontinue.
       The advice given covers that eventuality so you can recover the
       application cost.
       *****************************************************
   DIR Next Page