DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 93811--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: square bear
Date: October 12, 2025, 9:26 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Many thanks.
#Post#: 95518--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: square bear
Date: October 25, 2025, 8:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello all
I've had a response from Croydon and they have rejected my
reply.
I'm not sure what to do now, please advise on my next step.
Many thanks.
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/S2jdTsD1/IMG-3383.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/S2jdTsD1
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/QBFmxvsY/IMG-3371.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/QBFmxvsY[/img]
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/30FCcTjV/IMG-3377.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/30FCcTjV[/img]
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/WhSwms1h/IMG-3378.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/WhSwms1h
[/img]
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/WDqmPr6Y/IMG-3379.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/WDqmPr6Y[/img]
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/1VsD6dxj/IMG-3380.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/1VsD6dxj[/img]
[img width=135
height=180]
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/DmPMDkwH/IMG-3381.avif[/img]
HTML https://postimg.cc/DmPMDkwH[/img]
This was my first response (16/09/25)
Hello
I make this collateral challenge against the validity of the PCN
as it is missing mandatory information as provided at Para. 4 (8
) (v) of
HTML https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukla/2003/3/section/4/enacted
(v)that, if the penalty charge is not paid before the end of the
28 day period, an increased charge may be payable.
Clearly, this refers to Para. 4 (8 ) (iii):
(iii)that the penalty charge must be paid before the end of the
period of 28 days beginning with the date of the notice;
Therefore, it follows that the statement: "If you fail to pay
the Penalty Charge or make representations before the end of a
period of 28 days beginning with the date of service of this
notice an increased charge of £240 may be payable” adds to the
lack of clarity by its omission. Even on its own, whether the
required information was included or not, it is also arguable
that it conflates the two periods using the word "or" which many
would view as being conjunctive. Furthermore, even if the
statement were to be interpreted disjunctively, there is still
no clarity due to the missing information. So, it follows that
it cannot possibly be interpreted disjunctively.
I look forward to your reply.
They sent a letter which is in this thread.
and this was my reply.(13/10/25)
Thank you for your correspondence letter dated 6th October 2025.
My grounds for representations/objections is:
CONTRAVENTION DID NOT OCCUR.
Many thanks
#Post#: 96077--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: square bear
Date: October 29, 2025, 11:07 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Hello all,
Can I have advice on the next steps I need to take on this,
please?
Many thanks
#Post#: 96142--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: October 30, 2025, 5:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Total failure to consider. Do you have any screenshots of the
payment/representations page?
#Post#: 96271--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: square bear
Date: October 31, 2025, 3:11 am
---------------------------------------------------------
HTML https://i.postimg.cc/3Wphr4DW/IMG-3186.jpg
HTML https://postimg.cc/3Wphr4DW
#Post#: 96883--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 5, 2025, 4:03 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I advise Tribunal time. Just won a case re the lack of
particularised vehicles.
#Post#: 97036--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: square bear
Date: November 6, 2025, 6:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you Hippocrates.
What steps do I need to take now?
Do I reply and tell them this?
Can you help me through this or do I contact a company myself?
#Post#: 97056--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: November 6, 2025, 7:40 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Does the PCN show any readable images of the signs? I'll PM you
later. Did you screenshot as suggested?
Homework:
Go to make a challenge. Screenshot the main page. In the box:
select a reason, type in a statutory ground from the PCN and
screenshot the result. There are 5 grounds.
#Post#: 114535--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: March 26, 2026, 2:46 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
DNCed because of High Court ruling v Croydon.
Case No: 2250604908
Wish they had done this on Wednesday as I formulated quite a
lengthy skeleton argument - well, for me!
#Post#: 115412--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parsons Mead/Gardeners Road, Croydon - 52J - failing to
comply with a prohibition on certain types of vehicles.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: April 9, 2026, 4:32 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> DNCed because of High Court ruling v Croydon.
>
> Case No: 2250604908
>
> Wish they had done this on Wednesday as I formulated quite a
lengthy skeleton argument - well, for me!
>
--- End Quote ---
Actually not Do Not Contested because Croydon could not be
bothered to inform the Tribunal, even though I did, but my
missive was not uploaded.
"Certain vehicles" not good enough.
*****************************************************
Page 2 of 3
DIR Previous Page
DIR Next Page