DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Private parking tickets
*****************************************************
#Post#: 126227--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: txl08
Date: July 29, 2026, 3:56 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
Hi, please could someone advise if the defence posted above
looks ok to submit?
#Post#: 126521--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: txl08
Date: August 1, 2026, 4:11 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: InterCity125 link ---
>
> I would immediately send a Subject Access Request to PE
requesting all info including the original PCN.
>
--- End Quote ---
Hi I have had a response to the subject access request which
includes the original PCN. Should I post it here?
#Post#: 126523--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: txl08
Date: August 1, 2026, 4:15 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
I need to submit a defence imminently, I'd really appreciate it
if someone could look over the defence I've drafted above and
let me know if it's ok. I have no idea.
#Post#: 126537--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: InterCity125
Date: August 2, 2026, 1:35 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Yes, please post up the PCN.
#Post#: 126582--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: txl08
Date: August 2, 2026, 10:06 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Original PCN images
HTML https://i.ibb.co/rf36KjyH/IMG-6504.jpg
HTML https://i.ibb.co/Y74dXdj9/IMG-6505.jpg
#Post#: 126584--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: txl08
Date: August 2, 2026, 10:09 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: jfollows link ---
>
> You have to file a defence or AoS by 20 July.
> If you file AoS you have until 3 August to file a defence.
>
> Do not use a boilerplate/template defence, instead construct
something which responds to the stated Particulars of Claim
(woeful) and specifics to your case and builds on the appeals
you have already constructed.
>
> DCB Legal will almost certainly discontinue rather than paying
the court fee, but that’s some way down the line and your
research will have shown you what’s involved between now and
then.
>
> It’s DCB Legal who is handling this, not Parking Eye. Of
course Parking Eye is the claimant, but they’ve farmed the work
out to DCB Legal.
>
--- End Quote ---
Hi, I've posted my propsed defence upthread which I need to
submit by tomorrow I'd really appreciate and be reassured by any
feedback you can give on what I've posted.
#Post#: 126587--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: tincombe
Date: August 2, 2026, 11:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Before going further, who is who here?
You refer to 'your' defence, but previously you have stated
clearly that you are not the keeper.
Do you have the, now, Respondent's signed authorisation to act
on their behalf? I got the impression in earlier posts that you
were just 'winging it' and signing as the keeper. That might
have worked with PE, but these are now legal proceedings and
who's who must be clarified IMO.
#Post#: 126588--------------------------------------------------
Re: Parkingeye PCN - Non-payment - Cockhedge Shopping Centre
DIR By: txl08
Date: August 2, 2026, 11:22 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: tincombe link ---
>
> Before going further, who is who here?
>
> You refer to 'your' defence, but previously you have stated
clearly that you are not the keeper.
>
> Do you have the, now, Respondent's signed authorisation to act
on their behalf? I got the impression in earlier posts that you
were just 'winging it' and signing as the keeper. That might
have worked with PE, but these are now legal proceedings and
who's who must be clarified IMO.
>
--- End Quote ---
Correct, I am not the keeper. The keeper/respondent is a
relative. Up to now I have helped them with the
responses/appeals and obviously written the defence above. They
are in agreement with this, I haven’t got written authorisation
but can get it. I didn’t see any option to declare this on the
court response other than a ‘legal representative’ which I took
to mean a professional, so yes just signed it as the keeper with
their knowledge and consent. From my reading on the forum it’s
possible to have a friend/relative (I.e. me) act on the
respondent behalf at the mediation call. Please correct me if
I’m wrong, I’m a bit out of my depth with all this.
*****************************************************
Page 5 of 5
DIR Previous Page