DIR Return Create A Forum - Home
---------------------------------------------------------
FreeTrafficLegalAdvice
HTML https://ftla.createaforum.com
---------------------------------------------------------
*****************************************************
DIR Return to: Civil penalty charge notices (Councils, TFL and so ...
*****************************************************
#Post#: 90525--------------------------------------------------
Re: London Borough of Bexley, entering bus/cycle only route,
Townley Road roundabout, Bexley.
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 18, 2025, 10:18 am
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [member=1]cp8759[/member] [member=7]mrmustard[/member]
>
> Do paras 43 and 67 still apply?
>
--- End Quote ---
We'd need a bit more context, how do you think they might apply
to the current case?
#Post#: 90567--------------------------------------------------
Re: London Borough of Bexley, entering bus/cycle only route,
Townley Road roundabout, Bexley.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: September 18, 2025, 4:42 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: cp8759 link ---
>
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=7582.msg90368#msg90368
date=1758110538]
> [member=1]cp8759[/member] [member=7]mrmustard[/member]
>
> Do paras 43 and 67 still apply?
>
--- End Quote ---
We'd need a bit more context, how do you think they might apply
to the current case?
[/quote]
@cp8759The juxtaposition of signs which are not allowed? The 953
and the legend? I can't find any other authorities which
contradict the said statement at 43.
Judith Tracey at DFT used to be a contact. But, I don't know of
any update. This was in pepipoo days. I can't find any exception
in the most difficult to access TSRGD 2016.
#Post#: 90571--------------------------------------------------
Re: London Borough of Bexley, entering bus/cycle only route,
Townley Road roundabout, Bexley.
DIR By: ivanleo
Date: September 18, 2025, 5:47 pm
---------------------------------------------------------
--- Quote from: Hippocrates link ---
>
> [quote author=cp8759 link=topic=7582.msg90525#msg90525
date=1758208738]
> [quote author=Hippocrates link=topic=7582.msg90368#msg90368
date=1758110538]
> [member=1]cp8759[/member] [member=7]mrmustard[/member]
>
> Do paras 43 and 67 still apply?
>
--- End Quote ---
We'd need a bit more context, how do you think they might apply
to the current case?
[/quote]
@cp8759The juxtaposition of signs which are not allowed? The 953
and the legend? I can't find any other authorities which
contradict the said statement at 43.
Judith Tracey at DFT used to be a contact. But, I don't know of
any update. This was in pepipoo days. I can't find any exception
in the most difficult to access TSRGD 2016.
[/quote]
You'll have to wade your way through the TSRGD 2016, obviously
at the time of the judgment the 2016 regs didn't exist, so you
can't rely on it.
#Post#: 90633--------------------------------------------------
Re: London Borough of Bexley, entering bus/cycle only route,
Townley Road roundabout, Bexley.
DIR By: abipa
Date: September 19, 2025, 7:08 am
---------------------------------------------------------
Thank you gentlemen for your time, much appreciated.
#Post#: 90649--------------------------------------------------
Re: London Borough of Bexley, entering bus/cycle only route,
Townley Road roundabout, Bexley.
DIR By: Hippocrates
Date: September 19, 2025, 8:17 am
---------------------------------------------------------
I need Sherlock Holmes to navigate 2016 TSRGD.
*****************************************************
Page 4 of 4
DIR Previous Page